Cheatography
https://cheatography.com
A brief explanation for psychologists in the following units: social influence, memory, attachment and psychopathology
Social InfluenceDEUTSCH & GERARD | 2-process theory (ISI & NSI) | ASCH | line length | ZIMBARDO | Stanford prison experiment | MILGRAM | electric shocks | ADORNO et al | f-scale | MOSCOVICI et al | blue-green slides |
Social Influence EvaluationLUCAS et al | maths ability | PERRIN & SPENCER | engineering students | MCGHEE & TEEVAN | nAffilators | SHERIDAN & KING | real shocks to puppy | HOFLING et al | nurses obeying doctor, no anxiety | BICKMAN | uniform | MIRANDA et al | Spanish replication | BLASS & SCHMIDT | expert authority | ELMS & MILGRAM | obedience correlated with f-scale | ALLEN & LEVINE | thick glasses dissenter | HOLLAND | externals and internals | TWENGE et al | more independent and more external | ROTTER | LOC not imp. in familiar situations | WOOD et al | minority = consistent = influential | MARTIN et al | changing viewpoint | NOLAN et al | reduce energy usage hung on doors |
MemoryBADDELEY | coding in STM & LTM | JACOBS | capacity in STM & LTM | MILLER | capacity of STM | PETERSON & PETERSON | duration of STM | BAHRICH et al | duration of LTM | ATKINSON & SHIFFRIN | multi-store model | BADDELEY & HITCH | working memory model | MCGEOCH & MCDONALD | effects of similarity | GODDEN & BADDELEY | content-dependent forgetting | LOFTUS & PALMER | clips of car accidents | GABBERT et al | post-event discussion | JOHNSON & SCOTT | negative effect of anxiety | YUILLE & CUTSHALL | positive effect of anxiety | YERKES & DODSON | 'inverted U' theory | FISCHER & GEISELMAN | cognitive interview |
Memory EvaluationCOWAN | STM = 4 chunks | SHALLICE & WARRINGTON | patient KF | CRAIK & WATKINS | 2 types of rehearsal | TULVING et al | different LTM stores | BELLEVILLE et al | mild cognitive impairments treatments | BADDELEY et al | dual task performance | BRAVER et al | central executive activity | BADDELEY & HITCH | rugby players recall teams | TULVING & PSOTKA | categories | GODDEN & BADDELEY | recognition test | YUILLE & CUTSHALL | real armed robery | ANASTASI & RHODES | own-age bias | PICKEL | suprising items | MILNE & BULL | report everything & context reinstatement | KÖHNKEN et al | increase in correct and incorrect info. |
| | AttachmentFELDMAN & EIDLEMAN | alert phase | MELTZOF & MOORE | facial expressions/ distinctive gestures | ISABELLA et al | synchrony and quality of attachment | SCHAFFER & EMERSON | primary attachment, separation anxiety | GROSSMANN | longitudional study | FIELD | father as primary caregiver | LORENZ | imprinting | HARLOW | imp. of contact comfort in monkeys | DOLLARD & MILLER | learning theory - drive reduction | BOWLBY | monotropic theory, maternal deprivation hypothesis, 44 thieves | AINSWORTH | strange situation | VAN IJZENDOORN & KROONENBERG | cultural variations | SIMONELLI et al | Italian variations | GOLDFARB | intellectual development | RUTTER et al | English and Romanian adoptee | ZEANAH et al | bucharest early interventioin project | HAZAN & SHAVER | romantic relationships quiz |
Attachment EvaluationCROTWELL et al | PCIT improved interactional synchrony | GROSSMAN | father's role = play & stimulation | GUITON | chicks imprinted on yellow washing-up gloves | HAY & VESPO | parents model attachment behaviour | BRAZLETON et al | primary figure ignores babies social releasers | BAILEY et al | internal working model | BICK et al | different observers agree on type | TAKAHASHI | Japanese mothers rarely separated from infant | MAIN & SOLOMON | type: mix of avoidant and resistant | KAGAN | temperament more imp. | LEWIS | prolonged separation didn't predict criminality | KOLUCHOVÁ | isolated Czech twin boys | LEVY et al | separated baby rats | RUTTER | deprivation and privation | ZIMMERMAN | little relationship between quality and attachment |
PsychopathologyROSENHAN & SELIGMAN | proposed signs for failure to function adequately | JAHODA | criteria for ideal mental health | MOWRER | 2-process model (UCS,NS,CS,CR) | WATSON & RAYNOR | little Albert | BECK | negative triad | ELLIS | ABC(DE) model | TAYLOR | up to 230 different genes invloved |
Psychopathology EvaluationGILROY et al | spider phobia treatment | GRAZIOLI & TERRY | post-natal depression | MARCH et al | CBT, antidepressants, combination | NESTADT et al | OCD vulnerable due to genetic make-up (twins) | CROMER et al | past traumatic event | SOOMRO et al | comparing SSRIs to placebos |
|
Help Us Go Positive!
We offset our carbon usage with Ecologi. Click the link below to help us!
Created By
Metadata
Favourited By
Comments
I think the Stanford Prison experiment is my all time favorite. Just shows how people conform.
Add a Comment
Related Cheat Sheets
More Cheat Sheets by Lolly1025