Paper 3 Psychologists Cheat Sheet by Lolly1025

alpha bias e.g. (theory of moral develo­pment), psychic determ­inism e.g. (uncon­scious conflicts repressed in childhood)

VAN IJZENDOORN & KROONE­NBURG

consider culture in conclusion

born equipped with unders­tanding of key concepts

GESTALT psycho­logists

whole greater than the sum of it's parts

establ­ishing principles e.g. (operant condit­ioning)

e.g. of social sensit­ivity

attachment research conducted on mothers => conseq­uences

attachment types = culturally relative

SOON et al

press button? know 10 secs before aware

ALTMAN & TAYLOR

social penetr­ation theory

WALSTER et al

matching hypothesis

THIBAULT & KELLEY

social exchange theory

investment model

SPROULL & KIESLER

reduced cues theory

MCKENNA & BERGH

absence of gating

absorp­tio­n-a­ddi­ction model

attachment theory (insec­ure­-re­sis­tan­t=more likely)

survey -> emphasis on charac­ter­istics diff. between males and females

0.7 waist to hip ratio indicates fertility

SPRECHER & HENDRICK

rel. satisf­action and self-d­isc­losure

phase model

sexist belief => more likely desire phy. att.

similarity between ratings of att. in actual couples

similarity typical to beginning attraction

ANDERSON et al

older partners = diff. filter order

WALSTER et al

equity theory

AUMER-RYAN et al

cultural influences (indiv­idu­alistic & collec­tivist)

LE & AGNEW

greatest commitment => most stable, long- lasting

GOODFRIEND & AGNEW

invest in future plans

person who initiates sufferers less

WALTHER & TIDWELL

non verbal cues not absent but diff.

WHITTY & JOINSON

online q = more direct, intimate

MALTBY et al

link: celebrity worship & body image in girls

SCHMID & KLIMMT

similar attachment to Harry Potter in indivi­dualist & collec­tivist culture

genetic similarity correlates with sz

JUCKEL et al

negative correl­ation between ventral striatum activity and overall negative symptoms

schizo­phr­eno­genic mothers

FRITH et al

metare­pre­sen­tation, central control

original diathe­sis­-stress model

CHENIAUX et al

poor inter-­rater reliab­ility in diagnosing

COTTON et al

males diagnosed more often

TIENARI et al

adopted children still at risk

GOLDMA­N-RAKIC et al

low dopamine in pre-fr­ontal cortex => sz

JAUHAR et al

CBT = small signif­icance

TIENARI et al

diathesis = genes & trauma

GOSPIC et al

ultimate game

KLINESMITH et al

pellet gun/mouse trap => chilli sause

RHEE & WALDMAN

adoption study -> genetic more prominent

stickl­eback fish models

SHACKL­EFORD et al

correl­ation: men using retention strategies & women reporting violence

jigsaw puzzle

BANDURA et al

bobo doll study

PRENTI­CE-DUNN & ROGERS

private & public self-a­war­eness

IRWIN & CRESSEY

dispos­itional explan­ation/ import­ation model

situat­ional explan­ation/ depriv­ation model

BARTHOLOW & ANDERSON

experi­ment: violent vs non-vi­olent game

KRAHE et al

desens­iti­sation: arousal with violent or non-vi­olent film

APD = less grey matter

CASES et al

geneti­cally engineered mice

southern US more agg. when insulted

jealousy, pain & loneliness can => agg., frustr­ation creates readiness

JOHNSON & DOWNING

KKK most electric shocks, nurses least

FRANCIS et al

internet violence

admini­str­ative control model (ACM)

PRZYBYLSKI et al

complexity = confou­nding variable

BERKOWITZ & ALIOTO

film showing agg. as vengeance (justi­fied)