Show Menu
Cheatography

Wetenschapsfilosofie Engels Overzicht Cheat Sheet by

Wetenschapsfilosofie Engels

Extern­alism (Leonard Bloomf­ield):

Primary phenom­ena: Actual utterances as produced by language users
Primary subject matter: Language use; structural properties of expres­sions and languages
Aim: To describe attested expression structure and interr­ela­tions, and predicting properties of unattested expres­sions
Ling­uistic struct­ure: A system of patterns, inferrable from generally access­ible, objective features of language use
Valu­es: Accurate modeling of linguistic form that accords with empirical data and permits prediction concerning uncons­idered cases
Chil­dren's langua­ge: A nascent form of language, very different from adult linguistic competence
What is acquir­ed: A grasp of the distri­but­ional properties of the consti­tuents of expres­sions of a language

Emerge­ntism (Edward Sapir)

Emer­gen­tism:
Primary phenom­ena: Facts of social cognition, intera­ction, and commun­ication
Primary subject matter: Linguistic commun­ica­tion, cognition, variation, and change
Aim: To explain structural properties of languages in terms of general cognitive mechanisms and commun­icative functions
Ling­uistic struct­ure: A system of constr­uctions that range from fixed idiomatic phrases to highly abstract productive types
Valu­es: Cognitive, cultural, histor­ical, and evolut­ionary explan­ations of phenomena found in linguistic commun­ication systems
Chil­dren's langua­ge: A series of stages in an ontoge­netic process of developing adult commun­icative competence
What is acquir­ed: A mainly conven­tional and culturally transm­itted system for linguistic commun­ication

Essent­ialism (Noam Chomsky)

Primary phenom­ena: Intuitions of gramma­tic­ality and literal meaning
Primary subject matter: Abstract universal principles that explain the properties of specific languages
Aim: To articulate universal principles and providing explan­ations for deep and cross-­lin­gui­sti­cally constant linguistic properties
Ling­uistic struct­ure: A system of abstract conditions that may not be evident from the experience of typical language users
Valu­es: Highly abstract, coveri­ng-law explan­ations for properties of language as inferred from linguistic intuitions
Chil­dren's langua­ge: Very similar to adult linguistic competence though obscured by cognitive, articu­latory, and lexical limits
What is acquir­ed: An intern­alized generative device that charac­terizes an infinite set of expres­sions
 

Week 2

I-LAN­GUAGE
Indi­­vi­d­u­al: strictly a property of individual human beings, not groups or commun­­ities.
Inte­­rn­al: meaning is internal and a language is a state your mind/brain is in.
Inte­­ns­i­o­nal: a language is a specific procedure, generating infinitely many expres­­sions of that language.
E-LAN­GUAGE
Exte­­ns­i­o­nal: resear­­ch­-­based on attested utterances or extens­­io­nally definable objects.
Exte­­rnal: view that conceives of a language as a public, inters­­ub­jec­tively accessible system used by a community of people.

Comp­­et­e­n­ce: what knowing a language confers, a grasp of all sentences
Perf­­or­m­a­nce: real-time use of a language

Meth­odo­log­ies:
- Corpus Collec­tion: gathering a body of naturally occurring uttera­nces.
- Cont­rolled Experi­men­tat­ion: testing informants in some way that directly gauges their linguistic capaci­ties.
- Informal Elicit­ati­on: asking an informant for a metali­ngu­istic judgment on an expression ➝ most widely used and critic­ized.

Ordinal scale: a partial ordering equiva­­lence in accept­­ab­ility or ranking in degree of unacce­­pt­a­b­ility.
Interval scale: a measure of distance between ordinal positions.

Week 3

Labov’s Princi­ples: the consensus principle, the experi­menter principle, the clear case principle
Corpus collec­tion: gathering a body of naturally occurring utterances
Whor­fia­nism: one's language determines one's conception of the world
phen­otype vs. crypto­type: overt and covert gramma­­tical catego­­ries
weak vs. strong hypoth­esis: language dete­­rm­i­nes OR infl­uen­ces thought
language acquis­iti­on: all three approaches agree that some unlearned capacities are necessary to learn language.
general vs. linguistic nativi­sts: languages are acquired mainly through inductive methods versus language cannot be acquired by defeasible inductive methods, its structural principles must to a very large degree be unlearned
 

Week 4

Stru­ctu­ral­ism: the shift from diachronic (histo­rical) to synchronic (non-h­ist­orical) analysis, studies of associ­ations
De Saussu­re: father of modern lingui­stics
Lary­ngeal theory: system including number of phonemes, usually called laryng­eals, of which the various IE dialects other than the Anatolian languages show no direct reflexes
Object of lingui­sti­cs: the language (Sauss­ure’s ‘langue’) as an abstract system

Lang­age: universal system which has an underl­ying, fundam­ental, structure so that linguistic commun­ication can work.
Lang­ue: the actual language spoken, e.g. French, German or English.
Paro­le: the individual speech act.

Sign­ifi­ed: the concept part
Sign­ifi­er: the sound-­image part
Sign: designates this whole relati­onship
The principle of arbitr­ari­ness: there is no direct connection between the sound-­­image and the concept;

Sign­­if­i­c­at­­ion: concerns the (vertical) relation between a signifier and its signified;
Value: concerns the (horiz­­ontal) relation between signifieds & signifiers

Synt­­ag­matic relati­­ons: rela­tions between elements that are combined within one larger system; these relations define the possible combin­­ations of elements (their distri­­bu­tion) at various levels (word, sentence); “The syntag­­matic relation is in praese­­nt­i­a.”
Asso­­ci­ative relati­­ons: relations between elements that have a common associ­­ation (to teach, teacher, pupil etc.); terms in an associ­­ative family; “the associ­­ative relation unites term in absent­­ia”.

• Prague School ➝ inaugu­ration of phonology; Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen ➝ glosse­matics; American struct­uralism ➝ start from scratch

Week 5

Gene­rat­ivi­sm: languages are systems with limited sets of lingui­stics item out of which we can generate endless number of sentences (Chomsky)
Stru­ctural lingui­sti­cs: method of synchronic linguistic analysis employing struct­ura­lism, especially in contra­sting those formal struct­ures, such as phonemes or sentences, that make up systems, such as phonology or syntax. (Saussure)
Desc­riptive lingui­sti­cs: the study of the descri­ption of the internal phonol­ogical, gramma­tical, and semantic structures of languages at given points in time without reference to their histories or to one another
Univ­ersal grammar: the ability to learn grammar is hard-wired into the brain.

A string of words is gramma­tical if it follows the principles of grammar of a language, ungr­amm­ati­cal if it does not. According to Chomsky, gramma­tical sentences should be judged as approp­riate sentences of a language by native speakers of the language.

Help Us Go Positive!

We offset our carbon usage with Ecologi. Click the link below to help us!

We offset our carbon footprint via Ecologi
 

Comments

No comments yet. Add yours below!

Add a Comment

Your Comment

Please enter your name.

    Please enter your email address

      Please enter your Comment.

          Related Cheat Sheets

          More Cheat Sheets by Soraya