Classification of Roman Private Law
Corporeal & incorporeal
Public & private
Movables & immovables
Res fungibiles & res non fungibiles
Corporeal = touchable
Immovables = land & everything attached
Res fungibles = replaceable thus generic
Only corporeal = possessable
| || |
Opp = specific item
Real vs. Personal Rights
Relationships between legal subjects and objects
Relationships between legal subjects
A right over a thing which is enforceable against the whole world
A right against a person which is enforceable against a particular person
Object of the right: thing/property
Object of the right: a performance by a specific person
Real rights are transferred through an overt and public act
Personal rights are transferred through an agreement
Roman Law on Ownership (dominium)
Limitations in the interest of...
Real action = rei vindicatio
Property capable of private ownership
Appropriate method of acquisition
Imposed by themselves or predecessors
Concept changed from early Roman law until the period of Justinian. Roman law eventually recognized ownership (dominum) as the strongest right over the thing and weighed the claims of third parties to the thing against that right.
Acquisition of Ownership
W/o intervention or dependence
1. Tradicio (delivery)
Who became the owner of the new object
Sabinians: owner of material
Justinian: Reducible new thing = owner of material. Otherwise ownership = maker/creator
Remedies: if the maker acquired ownership in good faith and was in possession (if not, then entitled to the rei vindicatio),
the owner of the materials had no remedy.
However, if the maker acted in bad faith, he could be sued for theft but was
entitled to the new thing.
The process of creating or bringing into existence a new object (nova species).
Only applied in circumstances where a new thing is creates. Alterations not sufficient.
Basic rule: Anything that was attached to the land became part of it, since land was regarded as the principle thing
Identity test: the thing that gave its identity or name to the new or composite things, counted as the principle thing
Applied to buildings
Other seldom used alternative tests: financial considerations or the relative size of the joining things
Harvesting of plants = no effect
Remedies: the owner of the accessory thing claim the value of his property or the owner of the principle thing not in possession could claim it back with rei vindicatio but had to pay the value of the accessory
Once plants take root - belongs to owner of land
However, the mala fide owner lost his proprietary rights.
Def: Joining together (through human conduct or natural forces) oftwo things that belonged to different owners
Take effective or lasting control
Owner must have intended to be rid of the property
Immovables became the property of the state
Escaped animals = res nullius again...
Movables became property of the person who captured them or the commanding officer
Unless they had animus revertendi (habit of returning to the owner)
Explanation: taking possession of things res nulius
Intention & iusta causa
Traditio longa manu - long-handed delivery
Traditio brevi manu - short-handed delivery (transferee already had control)
What if the parties were mistaken as to the iusta causa?
Constitutum possessorium - (opposite of traditio brevi manu) transferor agreed to pass ownership of the thing to the transferee, but the former retained temporary control
Putative mistakes: transferor may have intended a sale, whereas the transferee though he was receiving a gift
Traditio symbolica - symbolic transfer
The two basic essentials: delivery and the appropriate intent
Nemo plus iurisrule: no one could transfer more rights to another than he himself had
Help Us Go Positive!
We offset our carbon usage with Ecologi. Click the link below to help us!