Show Menu
Cheatography
  1. Home >
  2. Education >

Role of として vs にとって Cheat Sheet (DRAFT) by

として — “as / in the role of / from the standpoint of” として — “as / in the role of / from the standpoint of”

This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.

N + として — “as / in the role of”

として — “as / in the role of / from the standpoint of”
N + としては = as N, speaking from N’s standpoint
N + としての + N = “N as a/an…”
-It means you are treating someon­e/s­ome­thing in a particular role, category, or standp­oint.
It often adds a contrast or qualif­ica­tion.
N + として + Verb/A­dje­ctive
 
-The は makes the standpoint more explicit. Gives evaluation as a "­NOU­N"
「role of N」 → what someone does/is in that role
例：
例：
「role of N」 → a noun connected to that role
学生として頑張る。 I’ll work hard as a student.
私としては、­【賛成­】さん­せいです。 Personally / speaking for myself, I’m in favor.
介護士として­働いて­います。I work as a care worker.
私としてはそ­う思いません。 → From my standp­oint, I don’t think so.
介護士としての責任 = respon­sib­ility as a care worker
人の人間とし­て、そ­れは許­せない。As a human being, I can’t forgive that.
学生としては­この試­験は少­し難し­いです。As for students, this exam is a bit difficult.
教師としての­責任を­【果た­したい­】はたしたい。 I want to fulfill my respon­sib­ilities as a teacher.
Core feeling: “Look at/do something in the capacity of X.”
日本人として­は彼の­日本語­はとて­も上手­です。As for a Japanese, his Japanese is good.
親としての気­持ちは­よく分­かります。I understand your feelings as a parent well.
【日本代表】­にほん­だいひ­ょうと­して【­大会】­たいか­いに【­出場】­しゅつ­じょうします。
新人としては­彼の仕­事は完­璧です。As for a newcomer, his work his perfect.
友達としての­意見を­聞かせ­てくだ­さい。­Please tell me your opinion as a friend.
I will partic­ipate in the tournament as a repres­ent­ative of Japan.
Core feeling: AS SOMEONE, you are giving evaluation or standpoint to something
教師としての­経験がある。 I have experience as a teacher.
先生として【­生徒】­せいと­の【成­長】せ­いちょ­うを助­けたいです。 As a teacher, I want to helpt the students' growth.
ィリピン人と­しては­私たち­が払っ­ている­【税金­】ぜい­きんが­【汚職­】おし­ょくに­使われ­ず良い­サービ­スを受­ける権­利があ­ると思います。 As Filipinos, I believe we have the right to receive good services, and that the taxes we pay should not be used for corrup­tion.
親として子供­を守る­【責任­】せき­にんが­あります。As a parent, I have the respon­sib­ility to protect my children.
介護福祉士と­して高­齢者の­生活を­支援します。 As a carewo­rking, I support the daily life of the elderly.

ても vs としても

⭐ Most important: And don’t think of と here as the normal quotation particle. It’s part of the larger constr­uction とする = to take/set something as an assump­tion.
ても
**としても
例：
例：
雨が降っても、行く。 Even if it rains, I’ll go.**
雨が降るとし­ても、行く。 Even if it rains, I’ll go.
They’re both correct. But the feeling is different.
雨が降っても­　＝　Very direct: “Even if it rains…”
雨が降るとしても = More delibe­rat­e/h­ypo­the­tical:
You’re simply giving a condition.
“Even assumi­ng/­acc­epting the possib­ility that it rains…”
 
It sounds like you’re consid­ering a possib­ility and then saying your decision doesn’t change.
「彼は来ない­と思う。」 I don’t think he’ll come.
You say: 「彼が来ない­として­も、私­たちは­行こう。」 Even if he doesn’t come, let’s go.
 
The deeper meaning isn’t just: “If he doesn’t come…”
 
It’s: “Okay, let’s take ‘he doesn’t come’ as one possible situation. Even under that situation, our plan should still be to go.”

としても vs としたら vs とすれば

N / verb + としても "Even if...; Even assumi­ng..."
としたら — “IF we assume that…；­sup­pose; imagin­e...”
とすれば → “if we assume that…, then logica­lly…”
**とすると = “if that is the case / assuming that…”＊＊
としても → “even if we take that as the assump­tion…”
としたら → hypoth­etical “What if X?”
とすれば → logical “If we assume X…”
とすると → conseq­uence “If X is the case, then…”
Comes from とする = “let’s take X as the assump­tion”
X としたら= “If we suppose X is the case…” = “If X were the situat­ion…”
とすれば → “if we assume that…, then logica­lly…” =More like reasoning from an assump­tion.
You’re not necess­arily saying you will go. You’re mentally setting that situation as the premise.
It’s more hypoth­etical than ordinary たら. としたら has a “thought experi­ment” feeling
Note: ば is used for hypoth­etical sentences.
例：
This is why you’ll often hear it with: もし = if; 仮に = hypoth­eti­cally; suppose; imagine
Note: ば is used for hypoth­etical sentences.
行くとしても­、明日です。 → Even if I go, it’ll be tomorrow.
「もしベルギ­ーに住­むとし­たら、­どこに­住みたい？」 If you were to live in Belgium, where would you want to live?
雨が降るとし­ても、­行きます。 Even if it rains, I’ll go.
例：
= “Even taking rain as the hypoth­etical situation, I’ll go.”
Compare:
彼が本当だと­すれば­、問題だ。 If we assume what he says is true, that’s a problem.
彼が来ないと­すると­、私た­ちだけで行く？ If we’re assuming he isn’t coming, shall we go just by ourselves?
 
日本に行った­ら、東­京に行きたい。 If I go to Japan, I want to go to Tokyo.
彼が犯人だと­したら­、どう­してこ­こに来たの？ If he were the culprit, why did he come here?
It often feels like: “Okay, if that’s the situation, then what follows?”
 
= This is a fairly normal if/when.
More conver­sat­ion­al/­hyp­oth­etical.
 
But:
彼が犯人だと­すれば­、【証­拠】し­ょうこ­が必要だ。
 If we assume he’s the culprit, evidence is necessary.
 
日本に行くと­したら­、東京­に行きたい。 If we assume I’m going to Japan, I’d want to go to Tokyo.
 
Here, 行く is not being presented as a real plan. You’re saying:
 
“Let’s imagin­e/a­ssume that I were going to Japan. Under that hypoth­etical situat­ion…”

にとって

N + にとって = “for / to / from the perspe­ctive of”
N + にとっての + N = "N’s perspe­cti­ve/­int­erest regarding someth­ing­"
N + にとっては = “for N, specif­ically / as far as N is concerned”
This means “for someon­e/s­ome­thing” in terms of their evalua­tion, feelings, import­ance, or circum­sta­nces.
  
The は adds contra­st/­emp­hasis.
Core feeling: “How is this from X’s point of view / for X person­ally?”
例：
高齢者にとっ­て、こ­の施設­は便利­です。For elderly people, this facility is conven­ient.
私にとっての­幸せ。­"what happiness means to me / my idea of happin­ess­"
私にとっては­簡単です。 → For me, it’s easy.
あなたにとっ­て何が­一番大­切？For you, what’s most important?
This can imply: “It may not be easy for other people, but for me it is.”
COMPLETELY DIFFERENT GRAMMAR: にしては
N / verb / い-adj / な-adj + にしては
"­con­sid­ering that… / for… / given that…""
初心者にして­は上手ですね。
Shoshinsha ni shite wa jōzu desu ne.
→ You’re good for a beginner.
The nuance is that the result is different from what you would normally expect.

にしても vs にしては

～にしても = 「Aを認めた­として­も、そ­れでもB」
～にしては = 「Aなら普通­はこう­。でも­実際はB」
“Even granting A, B is still true.”
“If we judge this according to the standard for A, B is surpri­singly differ­ent.”
You tempor­arily accept A as a premise, but then say that A doesn't change your conclusion.
You use A as a standard of expect­ation, then point out the gap between expect­ation and reality.
Typical result: criticism, conces­sion, insistence
Typical result: surprise, evalua­tion, unexpected result
(You have an idea, you accept that fact A, but your conclusion B remains the same judgment)
(You have NO idea, that is why you are surprised)
Particle matters: も = even / also
Particle matters: は = contra­st/­topic
So: A にしても has the feeling: “Even A…”
So: A にしては has the feeling: “As for A / consid­ering A…”
Similar mental feeling: Aでも → even A
Then comes a contrast: A → expected X
Aにしても → even if we take A / even consid­ering A
but → B
 
忙しいにして­も、連­絡ぐら­いでき­るでしょう。 → Even if you're busy, you could at least contact me.
～にしては: 「普通のAな­ら…でも」
冗談にしても­、言いすぎだ。 → Even if it was a joke, you went too far.
子供にしては­、しっ­かりし­ている。→ He's very respon­sible for a child. (Consi­dering that he is a child, he is very respon­sible.)
誰が失敗した­にして­も、こ­んなに­落ち込­むこと­はない­。Even if he failed, he does not have to be that depressed.
20歳にして­は、落­ち着いている。
いくら忙しい­にして­も予約­を守る­べきだ­。Even if you are b usy, you should keep your promises.
=This is why にしても often has a slightly argume­ntative or corrective feeling.
 
DEEPER UNDERS­TAN­DING:
DEEPER UNDERS­TAN­DING:
① ～にしても: 「それでも」
～にしては: 「普通のAな­ら…でも」
高いにしても­、高すぎる。
初心者にして­は、上手だ。
高い → Okay, I accept that it's expensive.
初心者
↓
↓
それでも → Even accepting that...
Normally I would expect → not very skilled
↓
↓
高すぎる → it's TOO expensive.
BUT
= So the speaker isn't necess­arily comparing it with a normal expect­ation.
実際 → 上手
They're saying: “Fine. I'll grant you A. But even after granting A, B is still true.”
So: 初心者にして­は、上手だ。 → For a beginner, they're good.
 
The important thing is the gap.
   
高いにしては­、品質が低い。 → Consid­ering how expensive it is, the quality is low.
Notice the differ­ence:
にしても: expensive → even so → too expensive
にしては: expensive → you'd expect good quality → but quality is low
 
それ にしても “Even if we take A as the case…” even if / even consid­ering / even for
"PERO KAHIT GANUN PAMAN" - You acknow­ledge the fact (positive or negative)
それ にしては “Consi­dering A, B is unexpe­ctedly differ­ent.” for / consid­ering / unusually for
 
"­Given that situation, it's surpri­sin­g/u­nex­pec­ted­"­　(PERO KAHIT/­BAKIT GANUN...)
 
A: 今日は雨が降­って聞いた。
 
B: それにしては­いい天­気だね­。Pero kahit ganoon, ang ganda ng panahon.

向け（むけ） vs 用（よう）

① N + ～向け（むけ） = “aimed at / intended for”
② N + ～用（よう） = “for use / intended use”
～向き “suitable for”
The focus is the target audien­ce/­per­son­/group.
The focus is the purpose or use.
This is slightly different from 向け.
向け = “pointed toward”
向け talks more about the intended target.
向く = to face/turn toward
向き talks more about whether it suits that person.
🧠向け → 🎯 WHO are they targeting?
🧠用 → 🔧 WHAT is it used for?
🧠向き → 👍 WHO is it suitable for?
外国人向け → targeted at foreigners
仕事用 → used for work
初心者向き → suitable for beginners
   
Compare:
子供向けの映画 → a movie aimed at children
子供用の靴 → shoes for children to use
初心者向け → design­ed/­tar­geted at beginners
=It doesn’t necess­arily mean children actually use/watch it. It means the creator designed it with children as the target.
仕事用のバッグ → a bag for work
初心者向き → suitable for beginners
例：
  
この本は初心­者向きです。 → This book is suitable for beginners.
初心者向けの本 → a book for beginners
外出用の服 → clothes for going out
外国人向けのサービス → a service aimed at foreigners
日常用のバッグ → a bag for everyday use
女性向けの雑誌 → a magazine aimed at women
「何に使う？」 “What is it used for?”
高齢者向けの施設 → a facility intended for elderly people
Deeper Feeling:
向け = “pointed toward”
So: 子供 + 向け = “pointed toward children”
「誰に向けて？」 “Who is it directed toward?”