Show Menu
Cheatography

UCSP - Political Organization Cheat Sheet by

universal system of norms, values, and roles for maintaining social order.

POLITICAL ORGANI­ZATION

universal system of norms, values, and roles for mainta­ining social order.
THREE TYPES OF LAWS
ASPECTS IN MAINTA­INING ORDER
CONSTI­TUT­IONAL LAWS
Creating formal norms
from the consti­tution
Applying sanctions
STATUTORY LAWS
Settling disputes among indivi­duals
legisl­ative bodies
Settling disputes between nations
COMMON LAWS
 
Unwritten laws

BANDS

Small, nomadic groups connected by family ties
politi­cally indepe­ndent
SOCIAL STRUCTURE
associ­ations of families allied by kinship, marriage, descent, friend­ship, and common interest
LEADERSHIP AND DECISION MAKING
Horizontal status and power
Informal leaders emerge based on skills, knowledge, and community consensus
Temporary political power with no signif­icant authority
Decisions made by community consensus
POLITICAL GOALS
ensure harmony and resolve conflicts within the band
Quarrels often arise over food, relati­ons­hips, or space
No. of people increases, potential for conflicts also rises
Conflicts may lead to the formation of new bands
POLITICAL SYSTEM CHARAC­TER­ISTICS
No central leadership position with authority
Difficulty in creating binding treaties with Native American societies due to the diffused political system
SURVIVAL OF BRAND-­LEVEL SOCIETIES
No tradit­ional band-level societies exist today
Lasted until the late 19th century

TRIBES

More complex than bands
increased population size and a shift in subsis­tence patterns
Kinship is based on more than family
INTEGR­ATIVE MECHANISMS
Pantribal associ­ations or sodalities - new integr­ative mechanisms
bringing together indivi­duals from different families
Serve to create order and unity within the tribe
LEADERSHIP AND POLITICAL POWER
Village headmen exist
Political power comes from senior positions within kin groups and the ability to persuade or criticize
leaders known as "big men" accumulate wealth to enhance status and influence, engaging in ritualized economic redist­rib­ution.
*EGALI­TAR­IANISM AND SELF-S­UFF­ICIENCY
essent­ially egalit­arian, with no family or reside­ntial group being politi­cally or econom­ically superior.
Families, including headmen's families, are self-s­uff­icient in basic necess­ities
IMPACT OF CONTACT WITH LARGER SOCIETIES
Tribal societies face conseq­uences when in contact with larger­-scale societies
No tribes have maintained their tradit­ional political systems unaltered by outside influences
 

CHIEFDOMS

mostly classless societies
Distin­guished by a permanent, full-time leader known as a chief with real authority
LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
Chiefs
BASIS OF STATUS
Seniority in kin groups is the primary basis
Chiefs are at the top of the kinship hierarchy, and others are ranked based on geneal­ogical distance from the chief
ECONOMIC REDIST­RIB­UTION AND STANDARD OF LIVING
Chiefs and their families often have a higher standard of living
perform societ­y-wide economic redist­rib­ution (similar to tax) by siphoning off surplus agricu­ltural products and redist­rib­uting them, holding back some for the chief's lifestyle
contri­butes to economic advant­ages, social stability, and security in diverse enviro­nmental zones
POPULATION SIZE AND DISPUTES
Larger population leads to less common­ality among people
Chief serves as an arbitrator and judge in disputes that cannot be settled informally based on kinship and friendship
ADVANTAGES IN WARFARE
Chiefdoms are more effective in warfare compared to bands and tribes
Larger popula­tions allow assembly of larger military forces
Centra­lized direction by the chief enables more decisive action
ESSENTIAL ROLE OF CHIEFS
Once establ­ished, the position of the chief becomes essential to the functi­oning of society
Chiefdoms cannot revert to tribal levels unless their population signif­icantly decreases
 

STATES

State-­level political systems originated from chiefdoms in societies with large-­scale intensive agricu­lture
Evolved into centra­lized, author­itarian kingdoms with distinct classes based on wealth, power, and prestige
DEVELO­PMENT OF STATES
Around 5,500 years ago, early kingdoms in Ancient Egypt and Mesopo­tamia developed state-­level political integr­ation
emerged in the Indian subcon­tinent and China shortly thereafter
By 4,500 years ago, Mesoam­erica and the central Andean mountain region of western South America also saw the develo­pment of states
POLITICAL STRUCTURE
Pyramid of authority with a hereditary elite class at the top, led by a king and royal family
Commoners, primarily food-p­rod­ucing farmers, consti­tuted the majority at the bottom
WARFARE AND CONQUEST
Compet­ition among indepe­ndent kingdoms
Victorious kingdoms annexed weaker ones
URBAN CENTERS
Cities housed major temples of state religions
HIERARCHY AND ROLES
SLAVERY
 

Comments

No comments yet. Add yours below!

Add a Comment

Your Comment

Please enter your name.

    Please enter your email address

      Please enter your Comment.

          Related Cheat Sheets

          "Getting Things Done" Basics Cheat Sheet

          More Cheat Sheets by Erich Toliongco

          21st CLPW - The Valley of Amazement Cheat Sheet
          UCSP - Authority and Legitimacy Cheat Sheet
          UCSP - Economic Institutions Cheat Sheet