Show Menu
Cheatography

The Legal Practice Act 28 of 2014 (UNIT 2) Cheat Sheet (DRAFT) by

Summary of the Legal Practice Act 28 of 2014.

This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.

PREAMBLE

1) Provide a legisl­ative framework
2) Ensure the Consti­tut­ional values
3) Ensure affordable legal services
4) Regulate the profession in the public interest
5) Remove barriers for entry into the profession
6) Ensure the accoun­tab­ility of the profession

PURPOSE OF THE ACT

(1) Restru­cturing and Transf­orm­ation of the profession
(2) Broaden access to justice by fees charge­able, community services, and equal opport­unities
(3) Create a single unified statutory body = LPC

FUSION OF PROFESSION

One of the initial transf­orm­ational objectives of the Act which has dominated the formul­ation of the Legal Practice Act has been whether to discon­tinue the statutory recogn­ition of the advocates' and attorneys' profes­sions.
The idea of a fusion of the advocates' and attorneys' profes­sions was however met with fierce opposition and abandoned after 20 years of negoti­tia­tions
A unified regulator, the Legal Practice Council, was chosen instead.
 

INDEPE­NDENCE OF THE PROFESSION

In order to achieve these object­ives, it must be stressed that an indepe­ndent, effective and competent legal profession is fundam­ental to the upholding of the rule of law and the indepe­ndence of the judiciary.
Attempts by the government to exercise state control over advocates and attorneys is not new. The National Party government made similar unsucc­essful attempts in the 1960s. There were frequent threats from government to place the legal profession under the control of a central council with govern­men­t-n­omi­nated members.
This proposal was succes­sfully resisted because it was well understood that to remove the control of the profession to government would have meant the end of indepe­ndence of the profession and the indepe­ndence of the bench.
Courts can only be indepe­ndent if judges were appointed from the ranks of those in whom the rigour of indepe­ndent repres­ent­ation has been inculcated by years of proficient practice.
A strong bench demands a strong and indepe­ndent legal profes­sion. As Judge Johann Kriegler once said, "­Falcons do not come from hen houses."
The late Chief Justice Arthur Chaskalson warned that it will open the door to important aspects of the profession being controlled by the executive and said that it was calculated to erode the indepe­ndence of the legal profes­sion. He further said the judiciary, as guardian of the Consti­tution, is to ensure that everybody, including the other arms of government act lawfully.
The Consti­tution entrenches democracy, the rule of law and intern­ati­onally recognised human rights as founda­tional values of commitment made in the preamble of the Consti­tution to "lay the foundation of a democratic and open societ­y"*
The Consti­tution also provides in s165(2) that the courts of this country are indepe­ndent, subject only to the law and the Consti­tution, which they must apply impart­ially without fear, favour or prejudice.
Judicial indepe­ndence is a requir­ement demanded by the Consti­tution in the public interest, without that protection judges may not be, or be seen by the public to be able to perform their duties without fear or favour.
The judiciary demands an indepe­ndent legal profession to enable it to perform its consti­tut­ional duty.
An indepe­ndent, effective, and competent law profession is fundam­ental to the upholding of the rule of law and indepe­ndence of the judiciary.
There are several provisions in the Act which affect the indepe­ndence of the legal profession
- the first issue is whether the Minister of Justice should have the right to appoint members of the Legal Practice Council (s7)
- the act states as its primary purpose the creation of a "a unified body to regulate the affairs of legal practi­tio­ner­s."
- the minister also has the power to dissolve the Legal Practice Council if she loses confidence in its ability to perform its functions effect­ively. (s14)
- she can then appoint an interim council, which can hold office for up to six months before new elections are held. While the minister must appoint a retired judge to conduct an invest­igation into the council, he is not bound by these recomm­end­ations.
- In addition, any interested party, including the minister, may on proper grounds, apply to the court for the council to be dissolved.
NB: the concern is that if there are differ­ences on important issues, the minister has the power to dissolve the council and that is incons­istent with the indepe­ndence of the profession. The legal profession is not a parastatal which the ministers may simply dissolve.
 

LEGAL PRACTICE COUNCIL

Section 5 - Objects of the Council
Section 6 - Powers, duties, and functions
Section 7- Compos­ition of the Council
- 16 legal practi­tioners = 10 attorneys + 6 advocates
- 2 teachers of law
- 3 persons appointed by the Minister
- 1 person from the Fidelity Fund Board
- 1 person from Legal Aid SA
Sections 8-23 - Membership and operation of the Council

REGULATION OF LEGAL PRACTI­TIONERS

Section 24- must be admitted in the High Court if duly qualified and -
1) SA citizen or permanent resident
2) Fit and proper person
The Minister may determine the right of foreign legal practi­tioners to practice in SA.

RIGHT OF APPEARANCE

Section 25- legal practi­tioners are entitled to practice throughout South Africa
- Right of appearance in High Court, Supreme Court of Appeal and Consti­tut­ional Court if in practice longer than 3 years + LLB degree
Candidate Attorneys may not appear in the High Court, Supreme Court of Appeal and Consti­tut­ional Court. They may only appear the regional division of the Magist­rates' Court if previously practiced for 1 year or completed 1 year of vocational training.

REQUIR­EMENTS FOR ADMISSION

Section 26
1. LLB degree
2. Practical Vocational Training
3. Community Service
4. Legal Practice Management Course
5. Passed examin­ati­on/­ass­essment

REGIST­RATION AS LEGAL PRACTI­TIONER

Section 30
Must apply to the Council once admitted for enrolling your name on the Roll of Legal Practi­tioners - attorney or advocate
Section 31
Cancel­lation or suspension of regist­ration
Section 32
Conversion of regist­ration at any time: attorn­ey-­adv­oca­te-­att­orney

AUTHORITY TO RENDER LEGAL SERVICES

Section 33
Only legal practi­tioners may, in expect­ation of any fee -
- appear in a court/­boa­rd/­tri­bunal
- draw up pleadings
No person may hold himself out as a legal practi­tioner or imply to be one if not qualified
If suspended or removed, may not render legal services.

FORMS OF LEGAL PRACTICE

Section 34
An attorney: may render legal services upon receipt of a request directly from the public.
An advocate: may render legal services upon receipt of a brief from an attorney OR upon receipt of a request directly from the public if in possession of a FIDELITY FUND CERTIF­ICATE.
The council must take recomm­end­ations regarding:
- multi-­dis­cip­linary practices
- recogn­ition of paralegals
 

FEES IRO LEGAL SERVICES

Section 35
The South African Reform Commission must report back to the minister regarding determ­ination of fees
1) Maximum tarriffs
2) Access to Justice

CODE OF CONDUCT & DISCIP­LINARY BODIES

Section 36 - 44
The Council must develop a code of conduct and establish discip­linary commit­tees.

LEGAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN

Section 45-52
To protect and promote the public interest.
Ensure fair and effective invest­igation of complaints
Promote high standards of integrity
Promote indepe­ndence of the profession

THE LEGAL PRACTI­TIO­NER'S FIDELITY FUND

LIABILITY OF THE FUND - Section 55
The Fund is liable to reimburse persons who suffer pecuniary loss as a result of:
- theft of any money, or other property given in trust to a trust account practice.
- in the course of the practice of the attorney or an advocate.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY OF FUND - Section 56
The Fund is not liable in respect of any loss suffered:
- by a family member of the household of any attorney or advocate who committed the theft.
- by any partner or co-dir­ector in the trust account practice in which the theft occurs
- by any person as a result of any theft committed after the victim of the theft received notice in writing from the Council or Board warning against the use or continued use of the legal services of the trust account practice concerned.
- by any person as a result of theft of money which any attorney or an advocate has been instructed to invest on behalf of such a person.
CLAIMS AGAINST THE FUND
No person has a claim against the fund in respect of any theft, unless-
(a) written notice of the claim is given to the Council within three months after the claimant became aware of the theft or, by the exercise of reasonable care, should have become aware of the theft, and
(b) within six months after a written demand has been sent to him or her by the Board, the claimant furnishes the Board with proof as they may reasonably require.
Any action against the Fund in respect to loss suffered by any person as a result of theft, must be instituted within one year
Industrial & Commercial Factors v Fidelity Fund
Money must be entrusted in the course of practice.
King v Fidelity Fund
- Theft of trust money
- Factoring scheme for estate agents' commission
- Claim excluded
TRUST MONIES
S84- must be in possession of a Fidelity Fund certif­icate.
S86(1)- every attorney must operate a trust account
S86(5)- interest accrued must be paid to the Fund
S87- Accounting records