Show Menu
Cheatography

Mate choice in humans Cheat Sheet by

Biological anthropology - human behavioural ecology and evolutionary psychology. Still part of my cramming journey for archaeology.

Defini­tions

Anisogamy
Differ­ential gamete size as a result of disruptive selection e.g. human egg = big and full of resources, human sperm = small and speedy.
WEIRD societies
Western, Educated, Indust­ria­lised, Rich and Democratic people. Used for a lot of psycho­logical and anthro­pol­ogical research, which is definitely contro­versial and unrepr­ese­ntative of overall popula­tions in the world.

Mate choice - Bateman's principle (1948)

Males
- undisc­rim­inating eagerness.
Females
- discri­min­ating passivity.
Sex with the largest parental investment (usually the female) will become a limited resource to compete for.
1. Males = higher variance in numbers of offsprings > females (higher reprod. success).
2. Males = higher variance in sexual partners > females (higher mating success).
3. Males = stronger rship b/w RS and MS > females.

Challenges to Bateman's principle

Hrdy
female primate research - females are not univer­sally coy + choosy.
There are advantages for females to have multiple male mates (polya­ndry) e.g. lower infant­icide + higher fertil­isation.
Females = choosy if population contains high variab­ility in male quality and/or lower paternal invest­ment.
Males = choosy if above is true for females.
Both = choosy if encounter rate is high = parental investment = similar for both sexes, similar and high variation in mate quality in both sexes.
Neither = choosy if low population density with low encounter rates.
Brown et al.
Sex roles are not universal, inter-­pop­ulation variation in reprod success b/w human males and females.
 
WEIRD societies show higher mating success in males > females, but most modern societies involve instit­uti­ona­lised monogamous rships (so similar mating success).
 
Rship b/w MS and RS varies b/w popula­tions e.g. if paternal investment is high, then MS and RS = low.

Anisogamy

Sexual reprod leads to the evolution of anisogamy and sex-sp­ecific reprod processes and associated strate­gies.
Sex biases in behaviour:
Mate choice, parental invest­ment...
Leads to compet­ition b/w members of same sex (e.g. stag antlers only in males, so not useful for survival generally) and inters­exual compet­ition (e.g. peacocks = costly tails, so must be fit to survive w/ tail, compete for female attention).
 

Attractive traits

Sweat signals compat­ibility
Hybrid vigour: sweat from someone w/ immune system most different to your own (i.e. variation) = most attrac­tive.
Beauty
Cultural? Babies stare more at "­att­ractive faces". Symmetry signals fitness (although symmetry is also selected for if only half the face is shown?). Averag­eness is preferred - famili­arity = safer, no genetic anomalies.
Testos­terone
High testos­terone = major costs e.g. reduce immunity. Testos­terone + male jaw -> sharp jaw signals high testos­terone, therefore must be fit to survive with sharp jaw.
 

Evolut­ionary psychology (EP) and mate choice

Beh. = predet­ermined by genes. -> univer­sality of behaviours because evolut­ionary behaviours are part of our shared human nature.
Mate choice: Focus on sex differ­ences, with recogn­ition to a minimal role played by social learning.
EP evaluates attrac­tiv­eness of traits based on parental invest­ment, reprod value and paternity certainty.
Parental investment
Effort + resources required to maintain offspring.
 
Leads to trade-off b/w mating + parenting efforts - looking after offsprings requires energy, so less energy is put towards mating.
 
Humans: males usually invest through provision of resources, so cues to attrac­tiv­eness related to provision = attractive to females (e.g. wealth + status + ambition).

Human Behavi­oural Ecology (HBE) and mate choice

Socioe­col­ogical context impacts beh. + most valued traits in potential mate.
Beh. = result of adapta­tions toward optimum reprod success.
Beh. = flexible + adaptive w/ underlying genetic mechan­isms.

Mate choice - Cross-­cul­tural study by Buss

37 cultures tested.
Males
Preferred young + attractive females.
Females
Valued financial resources - women = less econom­ically indepe­ndent?
High cultural variation b/w sexes.
e.g. Hadza hunter­-ga­the­rers: men aren't the only providers, so woman's work ethic was an important factor of attrac­tiv­eness.
Sex differ­ences:
Female attrac­tiv­eness
Full lips, sprightly gait, luscious hair and clear skin.
Male attrac­tiv­eness
Wealth + status.
 
Study w/ attrac­tiv­eness rating of males by females in nice v. average car = most attractive in nice car.
 

Comments

No comments yet. Add yours below!

Add a Comment

Your Comment

Please enter your name.

    Please enter your email address

      Please enter your Comment.

          Related Cheat Sheets

          Archaeology Timeline Cheat Sheet
          Achieving Monumentality in States Cheat Sheet
          Human lineage Cheat Sheet

          More Cheat Sheets by Anais_Pe

          Physics GCSE Paper 2 Cheat Sheet
          Biology A level OCR - Eukaryotic Cell Structure Cheat Sheet
          Biology A level - Genetics of Living Systems Cheat Sheet