Show Menu
Cheatography

Mate choice in humans Cheat Sheet by

Biological anthropology - human behavioural ecology and evolutionary psychology. Still part of my cramming journey for archaeology.

Defini­tions

Anisogamy
Differ­ential gamete size as a result of disruptive selection e.g. human egg = big and full of resources, human sperm = small and speedy.
WEIRD societies
Western, Educated, Indust­ria­lised, Rich and Democratic people. Used for a lot of psycho­logical and anthro­pol­ogical research, which is definitely contro­versial and unrepr­ese­ntative of overall popula­tions in the world.

Mate choice - Bateman's principle (1948)

Males
- undisc­rim­inating eagerness.
Females
- discri­min­ating passivity.
Sex with the largest parental investment (usually the female) will become a limited resource to compete for.
1. Males = higher variance in numbers of offsprings > females (higher reprod. success).
2. Males = higher variance in sexual partners > females (higher mating success).
3. Males = stronger rship b/w RS and MS > females.

Challenges to Bateman's principle

Hrdy
female primate research - females are not univer­sally coy + choosy.
There are advantages for females to have multiple male mates (polya­ndry) e.g. lower infant­icide + higher fertil­isation.
Females = choosy if population contains high variab­ility in male quality and/or lower paternal invest­ment.
Males = choosy if above is true for females.
Both = choosy if encounter rate is high = parental investment = similar for both sexes, similar and high variation in mate quality in both sexes.
Neither = choosy if low population density with low encounter rates.
Brown et al.
Sex roles are not universal, inter-­pop­ulation variation in reprod success b/w human males and females.
 
WEIRD societies show higher mating success in males > females, but most modern societies involve instit­uti­ona­lised monogamous rships (so similar mating success).
 
Rship b/w MS and RS varies b/w popula­tions e.g. if paternal investment is high, then MS and RS = low.

Anisogamy

Sexual reprod leads to the evolution of anisogamy and sex-sp­ecific reprod processes and associated strate­gies.
Sex biases in behaviour:
Mate choice, parental invest­ment...
Leads to compet­ition b/w members of same sex (e.g. stag antlers only in males, so not useful for survival generally) and inters­exual compet­ition (e.g. peacocks = costly tails, so must be fit to survive w/ tail, compete for female attention).
 

Attractive traits

Sweat signals compat­ibility
Hybrid vigour: sweat from someone w/ immune system most different to your own (i.e. variation) = most attrac­tive.
Beauty
Cultural? Babies stare more at "­att­ractive faces". Symmetry signals fitness (although symmetry is also selected for if only half the face is shown?). Averag­eness is preferred - famili­arity = safer, no genetic anomalies.
Testos­terone
High testos­terone = major costs e.g. reduce immunity. Testos­terone + male jaw -> sharp jaw signals high testos­terone, therefore must be fit to survive with sharp jaw.
 

Evolut­ionary psychology (EP) and mate choice

Beh. = predet­ermined by genes. -> univer­sality of behaviours because evolut­ionary behaviours are part of our shared human nature.
Mate choice: Focus on sex differ­ences, with recogn­ition to a minimal role played by social learning.
EP evaluates attrac­tiv­eness of traits based on parental invest­ment, reprod value and paternity certainty.
Parental investment
Effort + resources required to maintain offspring.
 
Leads to trade-off b/w mating + parenting efforts - looking after offsprings requires energy, so less energy is put towards mating.
 
Humans: males usually invest through provision of resources, so cues to attrac­tiv­eness related to provision = attractive to females (e.g. wealth + status + ambition).

Human Behavi­oural Ecology (HBE) and mate choice

Socioe­col­ogical context impacts beh. + most valued traits in potential mate.
Beh. = result of adapta­tions toward optimum reprod success.
Beh. = flexible + adaptive w/ underlying genetic mechan­isms.

Mate choice - Cross-­cul­tural study by Buss

37 cultures tested.
Males
Preferred young + attractive females.
Females
Valued financial resources - women = less econom­ically indepe­ndent?
High cultural variation b/w sexes.
e.g. Hadza hunter­-ga­the­rers: men aren't the only providers, so woman's work ethic was an important factor of attrac­tiv­eness.
Sex differ­ences:
Female attrac­tiv­eness
Full lips, sprightly gait, luscious hair and clear skin.
Male attrac­tiv­eness
Wealth + status.
 
Study w/ attrac­tiv­eness rating of males by females in nice v. average car = most attractive in nice car.
 

Comments

No comments yet. Add yours below!

Add a Comment

Your Comment

Please enter your name.

    Please enter your email address

      Please enter your Comment.

          Related Cheat Sheets

          Archaeology Timeline Cheat Sheet
          Architecture - Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia Cheat Sheet
          Osteoarchaeology Cheat Sheet

          More Cheat Sheets by Anais_Pe

          Biology A level - Hormonal communication Cheat Sheet
          Osteoarchaeology Cheat Sheet
          Mesopotamia - Key Case Studies Cheat Sheet