Show Menu
Cheatography

A Level Law criminal law paper 2 Cheat Sheet (DRAFT) by

A level criminal law paper 2

This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.

Sentencing

1. Custodial sentencing
Sent to prison­-us­ually for serious crimes e.g. murder robbery- fix term or life impris­onment- can be mandatory or discre­tionary
2.comm­unity sentence
Offender remains in community but follows rules e.g. unpaid work (community service), curfews, rehabi­lit­ation progra­ms-­given for less serious crimes or first time offenders
3. Fines
Offender must pay a sum of money-­common for minor offences e.g.tr­affic violation
4. Discharges
Absolute discharge
No punishment given, but conviction stands
Condit­ional discharge
No punishment unless offender commits another offence within a set period
FACTORS INFLUE­NCIING SENTENCING
-aggra­vated factors (harsher sentence)
-use of weapon -previous convic­tion- vulner­ability of victims e.g.g child or elder- racial or religious hostility- planning or premed­iat­ation
-mitig­ating factors (can reduce sentence)
-no previous convic­tion- remorse shown by offender- young age or mental illnes­s-c­oop­eration with police­-pr­ovo­cation or duress

Actus reus

1.Positive Voluntary actions
Defendant must do something voluntary
 
Involu­ntary actions are NOT Actus reus
 
E.g. walking, hitting, stealing- all positive, voluntary actions
2. Omission (failure to act)
Failure to act when it is a legal duty to act
 
No legal duty=no liability
R v stone and dobinson (omission through relati­onship)
Failure to take care of child
R v gibbons and proctor
Duty from relati­onship, parents starved child to death
R v. Miller
Duty from dangerous situations set mattress on fire
3. Causation
Must be proven that defendant caused prohibited conseq­uences
Factual causation
“But for test”
But for the defendants conduct, would the result have occurred?
R v white
Intended to poison mother but she foiled of heart attack instea­d-not guilty of murder
Legal causation
Act must be a signif­icant cause of conseq
-defendant act don’t have to be cause, just more than minimal
Chain of causation must remain intact
Interv­ening at can break chain of unfors­eeable or dispro­por­tionate
R v pagettt
Girlfriend as human shield as an act of self defence

Aim and purpose of sentencing

1.retr­ibution
Punishment as payback or reveng­e-o­ffender “deserves” to be punished
2.dete­rrence
general deterrence to discourage others in society- individual deterrence to stop particular offenders from reoffe­nding
3.reha­bil­itation
Help offenders reform and integrate into society
4.prot­ection of the public
Keep dangerous offenders away-i­mpr­iso­nment
5.repa­ration
Compensate the victim or society thru fines or community service
 

Non fatal offences

1.Assault
Actus reus
Causing appreh­ension of immediate unlawful harm
Means rea
Intention or subjective reckle­ssness
R v ireland
Silent calls repeatedly can amount to assault if causing substa­ntial psycho­logical harm
2.Battery
Actus reus
Applic­ation of unlawful force to another person­-even the slightest uncons­ented touch
Mens rea
Intention or subjective reckle­ssnes
Collins v wilcock
Grabbed woman’s hand without any legal justif­ication
Actual Bodily Harm
ABH s.47 OAPA
Actus reus
Either assault or battery that causes substa­ntial bodily harm e.g. bruises, cuts, recognised psychi­atric harm
Mens rea
Of assault or batter­y;i­nte­nsion to commit either with foreseen ABH
R v Miller
Defined ABH “any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with health or comfort)
Grievous Bodily Harm
GBH s.20 OAPA-m­ali­cious wounding or inflicting GBH
Actus reus
Unlawfully wounds, inflicts grievous bodily harm. “Really serious harm”
Mens rea
Must me reckless as to causing some harm-not necess­arily s
DPP v Smith
GBH defined as VERY SERIOUS PHYSICAL HARM
R v Bollom
GBH should take into account age and health of victim, baby injuries treated more seriously
R v Parmenter
Injured baby by handiling roughly . Did not foresee harm. Court held under s.20d must for see harm even if not serious
GBH with intent
S.18 OAPA
Actus reus
Unlawful wounds or inflicts grievous bodily harm-s­erious harm (same as GBH)
Mens rea
Specific intent to cause grievous bodily harm. Or intent to resist. Or prevent lawful appreh­ension or any persons Much more serious

Hierarchy of non fatal offences

OFFENCE
MAX SENTENCE
S.18 GBH
Life
s.20 GBH
5 years
s.47 ABH
5years
Battery
6months
Assault
6 months

Mens Rea

Refers to the defendants state of mind at the time of the crime
Shows intent, knowledge, reckle­ssness, or belief about crime
Prosec­ution must prove Mens Rea along with Actus reus
Types of men’s rea
1.inte­ntion
Direct intention: defendants main aim to bring specific conseq­uences
Oblique intention :conse­quences is not main aim but is virtually certain side effect e.g. r v woolin in baby thrown into pram
2.reck­les­sness
Defendant did action for seeing there was a risk but still went ahead-key test is subjective
R v cunningham
D pulled gas’s meter off causing gas’s leak and endangered neighbours though normal ppl forsee risk
3. Knowledge and belief
In some cases it’s enough to believe or know certain things even if they did not intent full conseq­uences
WHY DOES MENS REA MATTER?
Show culpab­ili­ty-­gen­erally can’t without right mental
Different crimes require different levels of Mens rea
Some offences are strict liability (no means Rea needed) but most not