Cheatography
https://cheatography.com
A level criminal law paper 2
This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.
Sentencing
1. Custodial sentencing |
Sent to prison-usually for serious crimes e.g. murder robbery- fix term or life imprisonment- can be mandatory or discretionary |
2.community sentence |
Offender remains in community but follows rules e.g. unpaid work (community service), curfews, rehabilitation programs-given for less serious crimes or first time offenders |
3. Fines |
Offender must pay a sum of money-common for minor offences e.g.traffic violation |
4. Discharges |
Absolute discharge |
No punishment given, but conviction stands |
Conditional discharge |
No punishment unless offender commits another offence within a set period |
FACTORS INFLUENCIING SENTENCING |
-aggravated factors (harsher sentence) |
-use of weapon -previous conviction- vulnerability of victims e.g.g child or elder- racial or religious hostility- planning or premediatation |
-mitigating factors (can reduce sentence) |
-no previous conviction- remorse shown by offender- young age or mental illness-cooperation with police-provocation or duress |
Actus reus
1.Positive Voluntary actions |
Defendant must do something voluntary |
|
Involuntary actions are NOT Actus reus |
|
E.g. walking, hitting, stealing- all positive, voluntary actions |
2. Omission (failure to act) |
Failure to act when it is a legal duty to act |
|
No legal duty=no liability |
R v stone and dobinson (omission through relationship) |
Failure to take care of child |
R v gibbons and proctor |
Duty from relationship, parents starved child to death |
R v. Miller |
Duty from dangerous situations set mattress on fire |
3. Causation |
Must be proven that defendant caused prohibited consequences |
Factual causation |
“But for test” |
But for the defendants conduct, would the result have occurred? |
R v white |
Intended to poison mother but she foiled of heart attack instead-not guilty of murder |
Legal causation |
Act must be a significant cause of conseq |
-defendant act don’t have to be cause, just more than minimal |
Chain of causation must remain intact |
Intervening at can break chain of unforseeable or disproportionate |
R v pagettt |
Girlfriend as human shield as an act of self defence |
Aim and purpose of sentencing
1.retribution |
Punishment as payback or revenge-offender “deserves” to be punished |
2.deterrence |
general deterrence to discourage others in society- individual deterrence to stop particular offenders from reoffending |
3.rehabilitation |
Help offenders reform and integrate into society |
4.protection of the public |
Keep dangerous offenders away-imprisonment |
5.reparation |
Compensate the victim or society thru fines or community service |
|
|
Non fatal offences
1.Assault |
Actus reus |
Causing apprehension of immediate unlawful harm |
Means rea |
Intention or subjective recklessness |
R v ireland |
Silent calls repeatedly can amount to assault if causing substantial psychological harm |
2.Battery |
Actus reus |
Application of unlawful force to another person-even the slightest unconsented touch |
Mens rea |
Intention or subjective recklessnes |
Collins v wilcock |
Grabbed woman’s hand without any legal justification |
Actual Bodily Harm |
ABH s.47 OAPA |
Actus reus |
Either assault or battery that causes substantial bodily harm e.g. bruises, cuts, recognised psychiatric harm |
Mens rea |
Of assault or battery;intension to commit either with foreseen ABH |
R v Miller |
Defined ABH “any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with health or comfort) |
Grievous Bodily Harm |
GBH s.20 OAPA-malicious wounding or inflicting GBH |
Actus reus |
Unlawfully wounds, inflicts grievous bodily harm. “Really serious harm” |
Mens rea |
Must me reckless as to causing some harm-not necessarily s |
DPP v Smith |
GBH defined as VERY SERIOUS PHYSICAL HARM |
R v Bollom |
GBH should take into account age and health of victim, baby injuries treated more seriously |
R v Parmenter |
Injured baby by handiling roughly . Did not foresee harm. Court held under s.20d must for see harm even if not serious |
GBH with intent |
S.18 OAPA |
Actus reus |
Unlawful wounds or inflicts grievous bodily harm-serious harm (same as GBH) |
Mens rea |
Specific intent to cause grievous bodily harm. Or intent to resist. Or prevent lawful apprehension or any persons Much more serious |
Hierarchy of non fatal offences
OFFENCE |
MAX SENTENCE |
S.18 GBH |
Life |
s.20 GBH |
5 years |
s.47 ABH |
5years |
Battery |
6months |
Assault |
6 months |
Mens Rea
Refers to the defendants state of mind at the time of the crime |
Shows intent, knowledge, recklessness, or belief about crime |
Prosecution must prove Mens Rea along with Actus reus |
Types of men’s rea |
1.intention |
Direct intention: defendants main aim to bring specific consequences |
Oblique intention :consequences is not main aim but is virtually certain side effect e.g. r v woolin in baby thrown into pram |
2.recklessness |
Defendant did action for seeing there was a risk but still went ahead-key test is subjective |
R v cunningham |
D pulled gas’s meter off causing gas’s leak and endangered neighbours though normal ppl forsee risk |
3. Knowledge and belief |
In some cases it’s enough to believe or know certain things even if they did not intent full consequences |
WHY DOES MENS REA MATTER? |
Show culpability-generally can’t without right mental |
Different crimes require different levels of Mens rea |
Some offences are strict liability (no means Rea needed) but most not |
|