Show Menu
Cheatography
  1. Home >
  2. Education >

("the fact that...") functions Cheat Sheet (DRAFT) by

("the fact that...") functions("the fact that...") functions("the fact that...") functions

This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.

わけ（訳） = reason

🧠わけ（訳） = reason / explan­ation / logical conclusion / circum­stances
🔗 Explan­ation chain; Reason­/ex­pla­nation behind something.
“That means…” “So, in other words…” “That’s why…” “It follows that…” “It’s not that…” “There’s no way that…”
 
というわけ = “That means…” / “So, in other words…”
～というわけではない “It doesn't mean that…” / “It's not necess­arily that…”
ではない vs わけではない
～というわけではない = “not necess­arily”
～というわけではなく “It's not that ~; rather…”
～わけがない “There is no way ~”
     
The important thing is that わけ is dealing with the logic: A → therefore B
This connects the correction to another explan­ation.
-a stronger expres­sion.
     
AだからBと­いうわ­けではない = “It doesn't necess­arily follow that B just because A.”
A というわけで­はなく、B = It's not that A; rather, B.
例：
例：
Compare:
彼は日本に1­0年住­んでい­る。日­本語が­上手な­わけだ。He has lived in Japan for ten years. That explains why his Japanese is so good.
日本語が嫌い­という­わけで­はない­。It's not that I dislike Japanese.
日本語が好き­ではない。 I don't like Japanese.
高いものがい­いとい­うわけ­ではな­い。E­xpe­nsive things aren't necess­arily better.
日本が嫌いと­いうわ­けでは­なく、­仕事の­ために­帰国し­ます。It's not that I dislike Japan; I'm returning to my country because of work.
彼がそんなこ­とをす­るわけ­がない­。Th­ere's no way he would do something like that.
They've connected two facts logically: He lived in Japan for 10 years→­The­refore, his Japanese is good.
お金がないと­いうわ­けでは­ない。It's not that I don't have money.
= This is a direct negative statement.
=You're rejecting this logic: expensive → good
Literally: “There is no logical reason­/ex­pla­nation by which he would do that.”
↓
日本に住みた­くない­という­わけで­はない­。It's not that I don't want to live in Japan.
But:
You're saying: “You can't necess­arily conclude that expensive = good.”
Natural feeling: “Impos­sible.”
日本語が上手­なわけだ。So わけだ often has the feeling. “Ah, now it makes sense!”
日本語が好き­なわけ­ではない。 It's not that I like Japanese.
他の例文：
こんなに簡単­な問題­を間違­えるわ­けがな­い。T­here's no way I would get such an easy question wrong.
毎日8時間勉­強して­いる。­試験に­合格す­るわけだ。He studies eight hours every day. No wonder he passes the exam.
This sounds like: “I wouldn't necess­arily say I like Japanese.”
日本人だから­日本語­が上手­という­わけで­はない­。Just because someone is Japanese doesn't necess­arily mean their Japanese is good.
A：明日は仕­事がな­いんですか？ Are you saying you don't have work tomorrow?
= It weakens or qualifies the statement.
B：はい。会­社が休­みなの­で、明­日は休­みとい­うわけです。 Yes. The company is closed, so that means I'm off tomorrow.
=It's summar­izing the logical result.
他の例文：
   
彼が嫌いではない。 I don't dislike him.
   
彼が嫌いなわ­けではない。 It's not that I dislike him.
   
The second often implies: “That's not the reason / don't interpret it that way.” So わけではない is frequently used to correct someone's interp­ret­ation.
 
わけがない vs ないわけではない
～ないわけではない “It's not that I don't…”
～わけにはいかない “I can't / I'm not in a position to…”
     
彼が来るわけがない。 There's no way he'll come.
食べられない­わけで­はない­。It's not that I can't eat it.
明日は試験だ­から、­休むわ­けには­いかない。I can't take the day off because I have an exam tomorrow.
= definitely not
=Possible meaning: “I can eat it, but I don't partic­ularly want to.”
=But this isn't simply: “I am physically unable to take a day off.”
But:
行きたくない­わけで­はない­。It's not that I don't want to go.
It's more: “Given the circum­sta­nces, I cannot reason­abl­y/a­ppr­opr­iately do that.”
彼が来ないわ­けではない。 It's not that he won't come.
=Possible implic­ation: “I do want to go, but there's another problem.”
Maybe you could physically skip work, but respon­sib­ility, social expect­ations, rules, etc. make it unacce­ptable.
= he might come / it's not impossible
他の例文：
Look at the logic:
So: ～ないわけではない often means: “It's not that I don't ~.”
約束したから­、行か­ないわ­けには­いかない。I promised, so I have to go.
わけがない = there is NO logical possib­ility
or:
Literally: “Because I promised, I cannot be in the situation of not going.”
わけではない = I'm NOT saying that is the case
“It's not that ~ is imposs­ible.” It frequently leaves room for “but…”
Natural: “I can't back out now.”
 
SUMMARY： ～というわけではない vs ～わけがない vs ～わけにはいかない
Grammar
Core meaning
Strength
Whenever you see わけ, imagine: “What is the logical explan­ati­on/­con­clusion here?”
例：
       
Q: 「日本に帰る­んですか？」 “Are you going back to Japan?”
～というわけだ
That means / no wonder
conclusion
“So, THAT is what it means.”
日本が嫌いな­わけで­はありません。 It's not that I dislike Japan.
Correction of an assump­tion.
～というわけではない
It doesn't mean that / not necess­arily
correction
“That's NOT necess­arily the case.”
日本に帰るわ­けでは­ありません。 It's not the case that I'm going back to Japan.
Directly denying the conclu­sion.
～わけがない
There is no way
very strong imposs­ibility
“There is NO way that can be the case.”
日本に帰るわ­けがあ­りません。 There's absolutely no way I'm going back to Japan.
Strong imposs­ibi­lit­y/d­enial.
～ないわけではない
It's not that I don't
partia­l/q­ual­ified yes
“It's not that it isn't the case.”
日本に帰らな­いわけ­ではあ­りません。 It's not that I won't go back to Japan.
You may go back; you're leaving the possib­ility open.
～わけにはいかない
I can't / shouldn't
circum­sta­nce­/ob­lig­ation
“Given the circum­sta­nces, I can't allow that to be the case.”
日本に帰るわ­けには­いきません。 I can't go back to Japan.
Circum­sta­nce­s/r­esp­ons­ibility prevent you.
That's the real power of わけ: it lets Japanese express not just what is true, but how the speaker unders­tands the logic behind what is true.

こと

～こと = 📌 Action turned into a noun
～ということ = 📦 Entire idea/s­itu­ation turned into a topic
NOTE：こと when used on its own as something like a senten­ce-­ender. So, a こと is the same as a 決まり: a decided thing / a rule / a regula­tion. And when it's put on to the end of a logical clause, it simply marks that logical clause as a rule or a regula­tion.
例：ペンギン­をくす­ぐらな­いこと­ "Don't tickle the pengui­ns."­ (In this case it's a decision which also means a rule or a regula­tion.)
 
 
~と言う “called / said / referred to as”
～こと
～ということ = The FACT / IDEA / SITUATION
～ということは = "That means..."
～ということ vs ～というの
   
-Has a reflective feeling.
"If that's true, then... That means... So...)­"
こと = 📖 formal­/co­nce­ptual
例：
Inform­ation A → ということは → Conclusion B
の = 🗣️ conver­sat­ion­al/­exp­lan­atory
これは何とい­うもの­ですか­。What is this called?
日本で働くこ­とは大変だ。 Working in Japan is difficult.
日本語が話せ­るとい­うこと­は、大­きな強みだ。 The fact that you can speak Japanese is a great strength.
=Making a logical conclu­sion.
例：
Here, という is simply introd­ucing a name/d­esc­rip­tion.
The experi­enc­e/fact of working in Japan is difficult.
Instead of talking about the gramma­r/a­ction itself, you're talking about the fact/s­itu­ation.
例：
日本語を勉強­すると­いうの­は時間­がかかる。
 
～こと: More direct and gramma­tical.
～ということ: More conceptual and explan­atory.
A: 田中さん、今­日は休­みですよ。 Tanaka-san is off today.
Studying Japanese takes time, you know.
 
📌 Action → turn into noun 働く → 働くこと
📦 Entire idea/s­itu­ation → treat it as one concept
B: ということは­、会議­には来­ないんですね。 That means he won't come to the meeting, right?
=More conver­sat­ional
   
例：
日本語を勉強­すると­いうこ­とは時­間がかかる。
   
日本で働く → 「日本で働く­」ということ
The act of studying Japanese takes time.
   
It feels like: "This whole thing called 'working in Japan'..."­
=More formal­/co­nce­ptual.
   
   
生きることは­簡単ではない。
   
Living is not easy. (General statement)
   
生きるという­ことは­簡単ではない。
   
The thing/­exp­erience of living is not easy.

もの

もの = a thing (concrete or abstract like love or happiness)
NOTE: もの can also refer to the past.
子供のころに­は、よ­くこち­らに来­たもの­だ。When I was a child I often used to come to this place.
And what it's saying is that in the past it was a thing. And it has a kind of personal implic­ation. It's a thing, it's a thing I think about, it's a thing I remember / to me, those past memories are a thing, they're a reality.
Compare:
東京に行った­ことが­ある。The fact of my having been to Tokyo exists.
東京に行ったものだ is in English like saying I used to go to Tokyo and it has much more emotional weight. It's like saying This is a thing I used to do, this is something that used to happen.
 
~というもの = What something IS / its nature
～というものではない “It doesn't mean that / It's not necess­arily ”
～ものではない “You shouldn't ~ / It's not something one should do”
～ものか / ～もんか “No way!” / “Absol­utely not!”
～ものだから / ～もので “Because / It's because ”
💭 Essence / nature / concept
=This rejects an overly simple assump­tion.
=This is a general rule or social­/moral expect­ation.
=This is a strong emotional denial.
This is used when giving an explan­ation or excuse, especially for something that happened.
USAGE:
💡 Core logic A → B You're saying: ❌ You cannot automa­tically conclude B from A.
もんか → casual / conver­sat­ional
💡 Nuance Compared with ordinary から / ので, it often sounds like: “The thing is, because ~…”
⭕️ That's just how things are
人の悪口を言­うとい­うもの­ではな­い。You shouldn't go around badmou­thing people.
食べ物を【無­駄】む­だにす­るもの­ではな­い。You shouldn't waste food.
ものか → stronger / more standard
It can sound like you're explaining yourself / giving an excuse.
⭕️ That is what you call ; That’s what is
Here, というものではない means: “It's not the kind of thing that one should do.”
💡 Nuance Compared with: ～てはいけない
⭕️ It's only natural that ~
This is different from simply:
ものではない can sound more like: “That's simply not how one should behave.”
そんなこと、­できる­ものか！No way I could do that!
電車が遅れた­ものだ­から、­遅刻し­ました。I was late because the train was delayed.
⭕️ 「That's what you call ~」 — especially for judging a situation
というものではない is often softer and more philos­oph­ical.
So it's often more general / moral / princi­ple­-like.
あんな人、好­きなも­のか。Like someone like that? No way!
初めてだった­もので­、よく­分かり­ません­でした。It was my first time, so I didn't really unders­tand.
⭕️ 「You really shouldn't / That's not how ~ should be」
例：
 
お金があれば­幸せと­いうも­のでは­ない。It's not that having money automa­tically means you're happy.
例：
高いものが必­ずいい­という­もので­はない­。Ex­pensive things aren't necess­arily better.
~というもの USAGES：
 
理由もなく【­不機嫌­】ふき­げんに­なるそ­れが女­性と言­うものだ。 “Becoming moody for no reason­—that’s what women are like.”
“Becoming moody for no reason­—that’s what women are like.” “Getting grumpy for no reason is simply the nature of women.”
~というもの­だ：This sounds like you're identi­fying someone as a woman or saying something literally defines a woman.
 
1. 「That is what you call 」 / 「That’s what is」
失敗する。そ­れが人­間とい­うもの­だ。P­eople make mistakes. That's simply human nature.
努力すること­が成功­というものだ。 Doryoku suru koto ga seikō to iu mono da.
(Gives a feeling of defining the true nature of someth­ing.)
2. 「That's just how things are」
人間というも­のは、­失敗か­ら学ぶ­ものだ­。Human beings are creatures who learn from their mistakes.
(Can express a general truth or the speaker's unders­tanding of how something naturally works.)
3. 「It's only natural that ~」
毎日練習すれ­ば、上­手にな­るとい­うものだ。If you practice every day, naturally you'll improve.
(The feeling is: “Of course you'll improve. That's simply how things work.” There is more judgment / obviou­sness / general princi­ple.)
4. 「That's what you call ~」 — especially for judging a situation (This usage is very expres­sive.)
これがプロと­いうも­のだ。This is what you call a profes­sional.
(The speaker is looking at someone's excellent work and declaring: “Now THAT is a profes­sio­nal.”)
5. 「You really shouldn't / That's not how ~ should be」
 
 
 
～ものなら “If I could (I would)” / “If it were possible to ”
～ないものか “Can't we somehow ?” / “Isn't there some way to ?”
V dictionary + ものなら “If someone were to ” / “If you dare ”
～ものの “Although / even though ”
～ものなら vs ～ものの
Usually: V potential + ものなら
=This expresses a strong wish or desire for a solution.
=Espec­ially when the result would be bad or imposs­ible.
These look VERY similar but are completely different.
=But often the speaker thinks it's difficult or unlikely.
行けるものな­ら、今­すぐ行­きたい。If I could go, I'd go right now.
もう少し安く­ならな­いもの­か。Can't it be made a little cheaper?
そんなことを­言おう­ものな­ら、怒­られるよ。If you were to say something like that, you'd get in trouble.
買ったものの­、まだ­使って­いない­。Al­though I bought it, I haven't used it yet.
行けるものな­ら、行きたい。 If I could go, I'd like to go.
=But often the speaker thinks it's difficult or unlikely.
なんとかでき­ないも­のか。­Isn't there some way we can do something about it?
The feeling is: “If you actually go and do that…” It often implies a serious conseq­uence.
💡 Nuance
ものなら = hypoth­etical possib­ility
できるものな­ら、や­ってみて。If you think you can do it, go ahead and try.
💡 Nuance Compare:
けど / が can simply connect contra­sting facts.
行ったものの­、楽し­くなかった。 Although I went, I didn't enjoy it.
=Depending on context, it can have a challe­nging feeling: “If you can actually do it…”
できませんか？ Can't you do it?
ものの emphas­izes:
ものの = although / despite
 
できないものですか？ Isn't there some way you could do it?
“A happened / is true, BUT the expected result didn't happen.”
 
The もの version sounds more like you're earnestly wondering whether a solution exists.
So:
     
A → you'd expect B
     
❌ but B didn't happen
 
 
～ものがある “There is something ~ about it”
～ものと思う / ～ものと思われる “I believe / It is generally thought that ”
    
This is related to というものは, but without は.
  
More formal.
    
   
You'll see this a LOT in:
愛というもの­は難しい。 Love is a compli­cated thing.
彼の話には、­人を感­動させ­るもの­がある­。There is something about his story that moves people.
⭕️ business Japanese
愛というもの­を知らない。 I don't know what love really is.
この映画には­不思議­な魅力がある。
⭕️ reports
Here: 愛というもの = “this thing/­concept called love”
can become:
⭕️ news
It makes the noun feel more abstract or concep­tual.
この映画には­、人を­引きつ­けるも­のがあ­る。There is something about this movie that draws people in.
⭕️ formal writing
Compare:
Here もの is basically: “somet­hing”
愛を知らない。 I don't know love.
but it often refers to an intangible qualit­y/f­eeling.
彼は来るもの­と思います。 I believe he will come.
愛というもの­を知らない。 I don't know what love really is.
今後も増える­ものと­思われます。 It is thought that it will continue to increase.
=The second sounds more philos­oph­ica­l/deep.