Show Menu
Cheatography
  1. Home >
  2. Education >

The Eisenhower Doctrine Cheat Sheet (DRAFT) by

The Eisenhower Doctrine notes

This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.

Background and Origins

The Suez Crisis (1956)
The Suez Crisis, also known as the Second Arab-I­sraeli War, was a pivotal event that reshaped the Middle East. It began when Egypt nation­alized the Suez Canal, previously controlled by Britain and France.
 
Britain, France, and Israel launched a military interv­ention to regain control of the canal, but the U.S., fearing that this could push Arab nations toward the Soviet Union, pressured them to withdraw.
 
The crisis unders­cored the declining influence of European powers in the Middle East and highli­ghted the need for a new U.S.-led approach to the region.
Growing Soviet Influence
The Soviet Union sought to expand its influence in the Middle East by supporting nation­alist and anti-c­olonial movements, partic­ularly in Egypt under President Gamal Abdel Nasser.
 
The U.S. viewed the spread of Soviet influence in the region as a direct threat to its interests, partic­ularly because of the Middle East's oil reserves and its strategic position.

The Eisenhower Doctrine Announ­cement

President Eisenh­ower’s Speech
On January 5, 1957, President Eisenhower presented the doctrine to Congress, outlining the need for a strong U.S. response to Soviet threats in the Middle East.
 
Eisenhower requested author­ization to provide military and economic assistance to any Middle Eastern country requesting help in resisting armed aggression from any nation controlled by intern­ational communism.
Key Principles of the Doctrine
Contai­nment of Communism: The doctrine aimed to prevent the spread of Soviet influence in the Middle East by supporting govern­ments resisting communism.
 
Use of Force: The doctrine allowed for the use of U.S. military force to protect Middle Eastern countries from communist aggres­sion.
 
Economic Assist­ance: The doctrine emphasized the provision of economic aid to help stabilize countries in the region and reduce the appeal of communism.
 

Implem­ent­ation and Impact

U.S. Involv­ement in Lebanon (1958)
The Eisenhower Doctrine was first put to the test in 1958 when Lebanon's President Camille Chamoun requested U.S. assistance to quell a domestic crisis fueled by political tensions and fears of communist influence.
 
In response, Eisenhower sent U.S. Marines to Lebanon, marking one of the first signif­icant military interv­entions under the doctrine. The interv­ention helped stabilize the situation, though it also highli­ghted the comple­xities of U.S. involv­ement in the region.
Broader Influence in the Middle East
The doctrine signaled to both the Soviet Union and Arab nation­alist movements that the U.S. was committed to mainta­ining its influence in the Middle East.
 
While the doctrine provided a framework for U.S. involv­ement in the region, it also compli­cated U.S. relations with Arab states, many of which were suspicious of Western intent­ions.
Strategic and Economic Motiva­tions
The doctrine was driven by the need to secure access to Middle Eastern oil, which was critical to the U.S. economy and military.
 
It also reflected the U.S. strategy of establ­ishing and mainta­ining alliances with key states in the region, such as Turkey, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, to counte­rba­lance Soviet influence.

Criticisms and Contro­versies

Regional Opposition
Many Arab nations viewed the Eisenhower Doctrine with suspicion, seeing it as a form of neo-im­per­ialism or as a tool for propping up unpopular regimes.
 
The doctrine was also criticized for aligning the U.S. with author­itarian regimes in the region, which often used anti-c­omm­unism as a pretext to suppress domestic opposi­tion.
Effect­iveness and Limita­tions
The effect­iveness of the Eisenhower Doctrine was limited by the complex political dynamics of the Middle East, where nation­alism, regional rivalries, and anti-c­olonial sentiments often outweighed ideolo­gical alignm­ents.
 
The doctrine’s focus on military interv­ention and anti-c­omm­unism sometimes overlooked the underlying social, economic, and political issues driving instab­ility in the region.
Long-Term Conseq­uences
The Eisenhower Doctrine set a precedent for U.S. interv­ention in the Middle East, leading to a long-term military and political presence in the region.
 
The focus on containing communism also contri­buted to the U.S.'s involv­ement in later conflicts, including its support for Israel and involv­ement in the Arab-I­sraeli conflict.
 

Legacy of the Eisenhower Doctrine

Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy
The Eisenhower Doctrine laid the groundwork for subsequent U.S. policies in the Middle East, including the Carter Doctrine and later military interv­entions in the region.
 
It reinforced the idea that the U.S. had vital interests in the Middle East that required protection through military and economic means.
Cold War Context
The doctrine was an important component of the global Cold War strategy, reflecting the U.S. commitment to containing Soviet influence not just in Europe and Asia, but also in the strate­gically critical Middle East.
 
It highli­ghted the interc­onn­ect­edness of regional conflicts with the broader ideolo­gical struggle between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
Contem­porary Relevance
The principles underlying the Eisenhower Doctrine, partic­ularly the emphasis on military interv­ention and allian­ce-­bui­lding, continue to influence U.S. policy in the Middle East today.
 
The doctrine is often cited in discus­sions about the origins of U.S. involv­ement in the region and its ongoing challenges in balancing security interests with regional stability.