Show Menu
Cheatography

Research paradigms Cheat Sheet (DRAFT) by

Types of health research paradigms

This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.

Define Paradigm ( theore­tical Framework)

Distinct from a theory, influences the way knowledge is studied and interp­reted.
It is the choice of paradigm that sets down the intent, motivation and expect­ations for the research.
Without nominating a paradigm as the first step, there is no basis for subsequent choices regarding method­ology, methods, literature or research design.
While the major paradigms will have an overall framework consistent with the defini­tions provided above, specific research paradigms may have particular features, which differ­entiate them from other paradigms within the same group eg neo-ma­rxist

Transf­orm­ative paradigm

claim that much sociol­ogical and psycho­logical theory which lay behind the dominant paradigms "had been developed from the white, able-b­odied male perspe­ctive and was based on the study of male subjec­ts"
aim to address issues of social justice and margin­alised peoples
"­believe that inquiry needs to be intert­wined with politics and a political agenda­"
must contain an action agenda for reform "that may change the lives of the partic­ipants, the instit­utions in which indivi­duals work or live, and the resear­cher's life"
Method­ology: Qualit­ative methods with quanti­tative and mixed methods. Contextual and historical factors described, especially as they relate to oppression
mixed methods approach provides structure for the develo­pment of "more complete and full portraits of our social world through the use of multiple perspe­ctives and lenses­", allowing for an unders­tanding of "­greater diversity of values, stances and positi­ons­"
Data Collection Tools: Diverse range of tools - particular need to avoid discri­min­ation. Eg: sexism, racism, and homoph­obia.
Language: Critical theory, Neo-ma­rxist, Feminist, Critical Race Theory, Freirean, Partic­ipa­tory, Emanci­patory, Advocacy, Grand Narrative, Empowe­rment issue, oriented, Change­-or­iented, Interv­ent­ionist, Queer theory, Race specific, Political

Postpo­sit­ivist (and positi­vist) paradigm

Aims to study the social world in a way that is value free, and that explan­ations of a causal nature can be provided
Positi­vists aim to test a theory or describe an experience "­through observ­ation and measur­ement in order to predict and control forces that surround us"
Post-p­osi­tivists work from the assumption that any piece of research is influenced by a number of well-d­eve­loped theories apart from, and as well as, the one which is being tested. Also, theories are held to be provis­ional and new unders­tan­dings may challenge the whole theore­tical framework.
Method­ology: Quanti­tative. "­Alt­hough qualit­ative methods can be used within this paradigm, quanti­tative methods tend to be predom­inant
Data collection Tools: Experi­ments, Quasi-­exp­eri­ments, Tests Scales
Language: Experi­mental, Quasi-­exp­eri­mental, Correl­ati­onal, Reduct­ionism, Theory verifi­cation, Causal compar­ative, Determ­ina­tion, Normative

Pragmatic paradigm

no philos­ophical loyalty to any altern­ative paradigm
focus on the 'what' and 'how' of the research problem
provides the underlying philos­ophical framework for mixed-­methods research
the research question 'central', data collection and analysis methods are chosen as those most likely to provide insights into the question
Data collection Tools: May include tools from both positivist and interp­ret­ivist paradigms. Eg Interv­iews, observ­ations and testing and experi­ments.
Language: Conseq­uences of actions, Proble­m-c­entred, Plural­istic, Real-world practice, oriented, Mixed models

Interp­ret­ivi­st/­con­str­uct­ivist paradigm

aims to gain unders­tanding "the world of human experi­enc­e"
suggesting that "­reality is socially constr­uct­ed"
tends to rely upon the "­par­tic­ipants' views of the situation being studie­d" and recognises the impact on the research of their own background and experi­ences
Don't generally begin with a theory (as with postpo­sit­ivists) rather they "­gen­erate or induct­ively develop a theory or pattern of meanin­gs" throughout the research process.
Method­ology: predom­inantly qualit­ative data collection methods and analysis or a combin­ation of both qualit­ative and quanti­tative methods (mixed methods).
Quanti­tative data may be utilised in a way, which supports or expands upon qualit­ative data and effect­ively deepens the descri­ption.
Data collection tools: Interv­iews, Observ­ations, Document reviews, Visual data analysis
Language: Natura­listic, Phenom­eno­log­ical, Hermen­eutic, Interp­ret­ivist, Ethnog­raphic, Multiple partic­ipant, meanings, Social and historical constr­uction, Theory genera­tion, Symbolic intera­ction