Show Menu
Cheatography

Contract Law 3 Cheat Sheet (DRAFT) by

Contract Law 3 terms

This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.

TERM OR REPRES­ENT­ATION

IMPLIED TERMS

Implied in fact: to give effect to the presumed but unexpr­essed intentions of the parties
Implied in law: where courts­/st­ature require this, regardless of intention

Terms Implied in Fact

Trade/­Pro­fes­sional Customs
Terms implied on grounds of custom, implied that parties intended to be bound by well-known customs of particular trade
Course of Dealing
Terms implied where parties have dealt with each other consis­tently and in a regular pattern over long period of time
Business Efficacy
Term implied if, without it, arrang­ement would be so unworkable that sensible people could not be supposed to have entered into it

Terms Implied in Law

At Common Law
Implied by courts to give legal duties
E.g. landlo­rd/­tenant relati­onship
By Statute: SGA 1979
Seller has right to sell goods and goods should: correspond with descri­ption, be of satisf­actory quality, be fit for purpose and bulk sale should correspond with sample and be free from defects
Breach = condition
Subject to 15A (minor breach treated as warranty)
Exclus­ion­/li­mit­ation subject to UCTA reason­abl­eness test
By Statute: SGSA
Transfer of goods: title, quality, descri­ption, sample - same as SGA
Breach = condition
(minor breach treated as warranty)
Exclus­ion­/li­mit­ation subject to UCTA reason­abl­eness test
 
Hire of goods: right to transfer, descri­ption of hire, quality, and hire by sample - same as SGA
Breach = condition
(minor breach treated as warranty)
Exclus­ion­/li­mit­ation subject to UCTA reason­abl­eness test
 
Supply of services: reasonable care & skill; reasonable time of perfor­mance; payment of reasonable charge
Breach = innominate term
Exclus­ion­/li­mit­ation subject to UCTA reason­abl­eness test
By Statute: CRA 2015
Trade/­con­sumer contracts for goods, digital content, services
Remedies set out in CRA 2015
Exclus­ion­/li­mit­ation subject to fairness test
 

CAPACITY - CHILDREN

DURESS

UNDUE INFLUENCE

CONDIT­IONS, WARRANTIES & INNOMINATE TERMS

Does the breach deprive the party not in default of substa­ntially the whole benefit which it was intended that he should obtain from the contract?

THE EFFECT OF UCTA 1977