Show Menu
Cheatography

Nietzsche Cheat Sheet (DRAFT) by

Summary of Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) for the first year course of History of Modern Philosophy

This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.

Background Info

He had an interest in the evolution and genealogy of morality and use platonic object­ivity as a strategy.
He stated that art was important but also seductive and that truth/­mor­ality is a lie that we produce
-> he was one of the masters of suspicion

Masters of Suspicion

The Masters of suspicion
- Marx: truth/­mor­ality is a product of economic circum­stances
- Nietzsche: truth/­mor­ality is a lie that we produce
- Freud: morality is shaped by subcon­scious forces
-> they all claim that there is no reasonable self-c­ons­cio­usness or relation to others

classical view of science

according to the classical view of nature:
- there is order in nature
- we observe nature and try to recons­tru­ct/­grasp this order
-> because this order in nature is in the objects, we can find it object­ively
- grasping the objective order in the pinnacle of science for the subject,

Science according to Nietzsche

science according to Nietzsche entails that:
- there is will to truth
- the world is chaos

he claims that, science is based on lies:
as order is a lie we produce, for there is
- no real sameness: everything is different
- seemingly simila­rity; we take similarity as sameness
-> this projected sameness is the basis of all faulty science and metaph­ysics
science is just a way to remain happy

The Suffering of Science

According to Nietzsche, scientists try to find safety in stable fact*-> but as the world does not guarantee this they contin­uously get disapp­ointed
-> this need for safety causes them to lack the courage to create their own catego­rie­s/lies
* a science relates to a spider in this way, the spider is also seeking safety and stability by organizing in terms of spinning a net so that it can life on it.
 

Truth and Lies

Nietzsche defines truth as: the commonly accepted relati­onship of language to things

Nietzsche saw lies/d­ece­ption as using language in an unconv­ent­ional way*; it is an uncommon usage which leads to rejection, simply because it harms the other
-> liars, then are, those who use language in an unconv­ent­ional way that harms us

origin of the lie:
- animals that do not find patterns of simila­rit­y/s­ameness do not survive (e.g. food or enemies)
- evolution selects those that have untrue projec­tions (and do not suffer from e.g. induction problem)

lying also has social benefits: it leads to morality
* for example saying water (thereby referring to the commonly used word/c­onc­ept), when in reality you're handing over something toxic (which is not commonly named water)

Reason and Intuition

Reason: gives stability, safety and science
->is lawful
the rational man: believes in abstra­ction and detachment from emotion, to seek truth and clarity and is described as, "­asp­iring only to sincerity, truth, freedom from deception and protection against beguiling attack."
-> is the antithesis of the intuitive man.

Intuition: is not fixated on historical lies, is always open for wonder and re-eva­lua­tion, should think of it as art (dealing with the world through unders­tanding that it is our creation), self-p­rod­uction of stability while acknow­ledging its limits.
-> the intuitive man is one who lives outside or free of the concepts which the rational man regards as truth
Nietschze prefers the rational man: as though he only succeeds in warding off misfor­tune, he suffers less than the intuitive man. He does not show emotions and executes a master­piece of deception. “When a real storm cloud thunders above him, he wraps himself in his cloak, and with slow steps he walks from beneath it.”

Language

usually, we claim to have knowledge when what one says corres­ponds to what actually is the case (corre­spo­ndence)

Nietzsche argues that this is not how its works, he claims that the relation to the world is shaped by life. As we depend on senses and sounds, and so the things that we take together may still be inherently different.
-> language is a convention that is always misleading

He claims that the world is catego­rised* in two ways:
- metaph­orical (e.g. gendering of plant and tree)
- abstra­cting (e.g. snake)

truth: an acceptable what of using sound/­for­getting you are using convention
These categories are socially conserved, which causes language to be immanent lie according to Nietzsche
-> another reason for this is that tradition makes us forget that lies are contingent (we use the words and forget that it is just commonly used and not the truth/­essence of the thing it stands for)
 

Anthro­poc­entrism

Nietzsche argues that human beings are on the same level in the world as e.g. ticks; the only difference between us and these animals is our unders­tanding and supposed capacity of knowledge

-> this was in contrast with the common belief, recognised in anthro­poc­entrism of the human as a biological creature that puts itself at the centre. who, thereby univer­salises their own relati­onship to the world, and according to which knowledge is subser­vient to life.

genealogy idividual

the world without human beings, according to Nietzsche is not much different, as the human just is (nothing more)
-> human beings just came to be

The human capacity for knowledge is actually not that special and came to be through evolution (and our need for knowledge) and cultural deceptions
-> "­humans ain't that special they just good at lying"

Genealogy common­ality

With Genealogy in terms of common­ality, Nietzsche meant that:
- human beings can more easily survive in groups
- the state of nature is not peaceful -> it is a war of all against all
- human beings call on artificial common­ali­ties: e.g. nation­ality, morality, truth, humanity -> to find peace and this war of all against all

Prodcuting Stability

Humans produce stability by making categories and forgetting the origin of these catego­ries.

according to Nietzsche, stability succeeds as it is tautol­ogical and space, time, and number are our (semi-­)ne­cessary creations