Show Menu
Cheatography
  1. Home >
  2. Education >

Psychology and MKULTRA Cheat Sheet (DRAFT) by

Psychology and MKULTRA Lecture Notes

This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.

The Psycho­logical Context of MKULTRA

Official Dates:
1953–1973 (official CIA program), initiated by CIA director Allen Dulles under Technical Services Staff chief Sidney Gottlieb. Roots trace back to WWII’s OSS research into “truth serums” and to postwar Nazi and Japanese human experi­men­tation data (Operation Paperc­lip).
Geopol­itical backdrop:
Cold War paranoia over Soviet and Chinese "­bra­inw­ash­ing­" techniques (Korean War POW confes­sions, show trials in Eastern Bloc).
Core CIA concern:
Cold War fears of Soviet and Chinese “mind control” and “brain­was­hing” techni­ques.
 
Korean War POW confes­sions and public recant­ations suggested to US intell­igence that psycho­logical condit­ioning could override loyalty.
 
Soviet psychi­atric abuses (e.g., using drugs and electr­oshock on dissid­ents) were seen as threats.
Why psychology was central:
The human mind was viewed as a battle­field.
 
If psycho­logical science could explain how to break, reshape, or control a mind, then intell­igence operations could achieve unpara­lleled influence over indivi­duals.

Psycho­logical Theories Behind MKULTRA

Behavi­ourism and Operant Condit­ioning
Key figures:
John B. Watson (classical behavi­our­ism), B.F. Skinner (operant condit­ion­ing).
Core princi­ples:
Behaviour is learned through condit­ioning.
 
Positi­ve/­neg­ative reinfo­rcement can shape actions.
 
Stimul­us-­res­ponse associ­ations can override voluntary choice.
MKULTRA applic­ation:
Could prisoners be “re-tr­ained” through reward­/pu­nis­hment systems?
 
Could fear, pain, or pleasure be strate­gically applied to elicit compli­ance?
Classical Condit­ioning
Key figure:
Ivan Pavlov
Principle:
Associ­ating a neutral stimulus with a reflexive response.
MKULTRA interest:
Create automatic triggers for certain behaviours — for example, a visual cue paired repeatedly with a drug effect to produce compliance without the drug.
Psycho­ana­lytic Models
Influence:
Freud’s concepts of repres­sion, trauma, and uncons­cious drives.
Later develo­pments:
Ego psycho­logy, trauma­-in­duced sugges­tib­ility.
MKULTRA link:
The belief that intense trauma could dissolve the ego and identity (“depa­tte­rni­ng”), making the subject malleable.
 
Rebuilding identity through “psychic driving” (repet­itive messag­ing).
Social Psychology
Relevant studies:
Conformity (Solomon Asch, 1951): Peer pressure can override personal judgment.
 
Obedience to authority (Stanley Milgram, 1961): Ordinary people can inflict harm when instructed by authority.
 
Role theory (Philip Zimbardo’s later 1971 Stanford Prison Experi­ment): Situations and social roles can transform behaviour.
MKULTRA use:
Creating enviro­nments where the subject intern­alised the experi­men­ter’s authority, magnifying compli­ance.
Cognitive Psychology
Emerging field in the 1950s–60s:
Focus on percep­tion, memory, learning, decisi­on-­making.
MKULTRA applic­ation:
Implanting false memories.
 
Inducing amnesia for operat­ional secrecy.
 
Altering sensory processing to distort reality.

MKULTRA’s Psycho­logical Objectives

Behaviour Modifi­cation:
Rewriting responses to stimuli.
 
Creating compliance in interr­oga­tion.
Memory Erasure:
Removing recoll­ection of specific events, useful for undercover agents or witnesses.
Person­ality Recons­tru­ction:
Destroying existing identity and replacing it with a new operat­ional persona.
Resistance Testing:
Measuring breaking points under stress.
Mind Control Experi­ments:
Exploring if indivi­duals could be programmed to carry out tasks without conscious awareness.
 

Psycho­logical Methods and Experi­men­tation

Drug-Based Experi­ments
LSD-25: Seen as a “psych­och­emical” to disorient and increase sugges­tib­ility.
Psycho­logical theory link: Altered states lower critical thinking, allowing for reprog­ram­ming.
 
Notable trials: Admini­stered to CIA employees, military personnel, psychi­atric patients, prisoners, and civilians without consent.
Barbit­urates + Amphet­amines (“Truth Drug” Combin­ation):
High dose of barbit­urates → semi-c­ons­cious state → rapid stimulant injection → induced disori­ent­ation, making subjects more talkative.
Scopol­amine:
Caused confusion, impairing ability to lie.
Mescaline:
Tested on prisoners in Germany by ex-Nazi doctors under CIA oversight.
Sensory Manipu­lation
Sensory Depriv­ation:
Developed from John C. Lilly’s work.
 
Prolonged isolation caused halluc­ina­tions, anxiety, cognitive decline.
 
Theory link: Removal of stimuli weakens ego defences, increasing compli­ance.
Sensory Overload:
Continuous bright lights, loud noises, and visual flicker disrupted attention and induced mental fatigue.
Hypnosis
Objective:
Increase suscep­tib­ility to sugges­tion; implant triggers or commands.
Experi­ments:
Combin­ation of hypnosis with drugs to bypass conscious resist­ance.
Limita­tion:
Not all indivi­duals are equally hypnot­isable.
Sleep Manipu­lation
Sleep Depriv­ation:
Disrupts circadian rhythm, causes paranoia, irrita­bility, halluc­ina­tions.
Drug-I­nduced Comas:
Ewen Cameron kept patients uncons­cious for weeks while subjecting them to repeated audio messages (“psychic driving”).
Electr­oco­nvu­lsive and Neurol­ogical Methods
Montreal Experi­ments (Allen Memorial Instit­ute):
“Depat­ter­ning” via massive doses of ECT and drugs.
 
Aim: erase person­ality to rebuild anew.
 
Result: permanent cognitive damage in many patients.

Documented Psycho­logical Outcomes

Short-­Term:
Disori­ent­ation, euphoria, paranoia, confusion, sugges­tib­ility.
Long-Term:
Chronic PTSD.
 
Depers­ona­lis­ation and dereal­isa­tion.
 
Cognitive impair­ment.
 
Emotional blunting.
Operat­ional Results:
Highly incons­istent — some subjects became compliant, others hostile or perman­ently incapa­cit­ated.

Ethical Violations (Psych­ology Perspe­ctive)

No informed consent:
Violates APA Code of Ethics and Nuremberg Code.
Use of vulnerable groups:
Prisoners, psychi­atric patients, minori­ties, children in orphan­ages.
Permanent harm:
Violated principle of non-ma­lef­icence.
Covert dosing:
Psycho­logical betrayal eroded public trust in psychi­atry.
 

Psycho­logical Insights Learned

Mind control is limited:
Human identity is more resilient than assumed.
Memory mallea­bility confirmed:
False memories possible; erasure unreli­able.
Trauma as a double­-edged sword:
Extreme stress can cause compliance but also unpred­ict­abi­lity.
Social enviro­nment is critical:
Isolation and authority structures can powerfully shape behaviour.

Case Study – Frank Olson

Backgr­ound:
CIA bacter­iol­ogist, unwitt­ingly dosed with LSD in 1953.
Psycho­logical reaction:
Acute paranoia, confusion, depressive collapse.
Outcome:
Fell to his death from NYC hotel (offic­ially suicide, but contes­ted).
Signif­icance:
Demons­trated unpred­ict­ability of psycho­logical drug effects even in trained indivi­duals.

Legacy in Psychology

Regulatory reform:
1974 National Research Act (US).
 
Instit­utional Review Boards (IRBs) became mandatory.
 
Greater emphasis on informed consent.
Public awareness:
MKULTRA revela­tions fuelled scepticism about psychi­atry’s ties to state power.
Academic caution:
High-risk psycho­logical research now more heavily scruti­nised.