Containment: An Overview
Definition: |
US foreign policy doctrine articulated by George F. Kennan (1947), aimed at preventing the spread of communism. |
Core Idea: |
Communism should be confined to existing areas, blocked from spreading into new states. |
Application: |
Military (Korean War, Vietnam War). |
| |
Political (alliances like NATO, Marshall Plan aid). |
| |
Covert/intelligence (CIA interventions, coups, and psychological warfare). |
Psychological Front: |
Containment wasn’t only about tanks and borders; it was about winning hearts and minds to stop ideological spread. |
Psychological Containment
The Cold War was an ideological struggle: communism vs. capitalism. |
US strategists feared that communism could spread through propaganda, persuasion, and psychological influence as much as by force. |
This meant containment required: |
Resisting enemy indoctrination (e.g., “brainwashing”). |
| |
Developing tools of psychological warfare. |
| |
Protecting US troops and citizens from communist influence. |
MKULTRA as a Containment Strategy
Background: |
Early CIA projects (BLUEBIRD, ARTICHOKE) explored interrogation and truth serums to fight communist subversion. |
| |
MKULTRA (1953–1973) was the expansion of these efforts, led by Sidney Gottlieb under Allen Dulles. |
Containment Logic in MKULTRA: |
If communism could spread psychologically, then the US had to contain it at the mental level. |
| |
CIA worried that the USSR and China had mastered mind control and “brainwashing.” |
| |
MKULTRA was framed as defensive research to prevent US personnel or societies from being “turned.” |
|
|
Containment Through Offensive Mind Control
MKULTRA also aimed to go beyond defense: |
Develop techniques to weaken, confuse, or break down communist agents. |
| |
Possible use in covert ops to destabilise governments leaning toward communism. |
In this way, MKULTRA paralleled military containment: |
Military: stop territorial spread. |
| |
Psychological: stop ideological spread. |
Vietnam, Containment, and MKULTRA
Vietnam War = ultimate test of containment. |
CIA counterinsurgency programs (e.g., Phoenix Program) drew on interrogation methods informed by MKULTRA research. |
Psychological warfare was seen as essential to containing communism in Southeast Asia. |
Shows how MKULTRA was part of the wider arsenal of containment tools — though covert and secretive. |
Secrecy and Ethics in Containment
Just as military containment led to questionable wars, MKULTRA led to unethical experiments (drugging civilians, psychological torture, hospital experiments). |
Both justified in the name of preventing communism from spreading. |
“National security” rationalized secrecy and denial of individual rights. |
|
|
Outcomes
Containment Successes: |
Prevented communist spread in Western Europe; contributed to long-term survival of US-aligned states. |
Containment Failures: |
Vietnam, Cuban Revolution, Afghanistan. |
MKULTRA Failures: |
Did not produce reliable mind control methods. |
| |
Left a legacy of abuse, scandal, and distrust. |
Both illustrate how containment could push the US into morally and strategically dubious territory. |
Key Takeaways
Containment was holistic: military, political, economic, cultural, and psychological. |
MKULTRA was the psychological wing of containment, aimed at countering communist influence at the level of the human mind. |
Both demonstrate how Cold War paranoia justified extreme policies and unethical experiments. |
MKULTRA’s role in containment highlights how ideology shaped covert science. |
Containment ↔ MKULTRA
Containment = stop spread of communism → MKULTRA = stop spread of communist influence/brainwashing. |
Military containment = wars in Korea, Vietnam → Psychological containment = experiments on mind control, interrogation. |
Public policy = Truman Doctrine, Marshall Plan → Covert policy = MKULTRA experiments. |
Ethical trade-offs (wars, coups) → Ethical trade-offs (human experimentation, drugging civilians). |
|
