Show Menu
Cheatography

La Mettrie Cheat Sheet (DRAFT) by

Summary of La Mettrie (1709-1751) for the first year course History of Modern Philosophy

This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.

Background Info

La Mettrie was influenced by, cartes­ianism, epicur­eanism, Contra­-Ga­lenic, and Herman Boerhaave

He was a materi­alist about the mind and didn't not believe in pure reason

Philosophy and Medicine

According to La Mettrie, philosophy and medicine had a shared goal: therapy for the body/mind
The philos­ophies of Descartes, Spinoza, and Hellen­istic philos­ophers formed the basis of science and provided an ethics which could both be applied to the practice of medicine
Medicine researched the mind-body intera­ction, and formed both an empirical basis for natural philosophy and a counteract against specul­ation. All of which could be applied to philosophy

The Soul

According to La Mettrie, the soul is physical
He claims that facial features can explain your character and give a view of one's soul (physi­ognomy)
the soul is also not divine, it is just the part that thinks. -> He sees the soul as a spring, like that of a clockwork mechanism
It is the quality and quantity* of the brain that determines the soul
-> thought can be streng­thened through education and dispos­ition
* according to Him the brain seems to grow in relation to one's docility
 

Life

Beings are....
according to many modern authors, beings are what we can see (causa effici­ens), and animals can be understood as machines

La Mettrie, claims that if the animal's soul is a machine, so is that of human beings
-> Man is a machine constr­ucted in such a way that it is impossible first of all to have a clear idea of it and conseq­uently to define it*
-> diseases can affect the way our mind works
* the mind is constr­ucted in a way that it cannot think about itself in ways of which it works, meaning that we have no idea how we work and what we are

Scala Naturae

According to La Mettrie, Man is not special. Thinking is a function of a machine, and it does not matter whether there is a God or not.

Often coloni­alism was justified by biblical and biological notions, according to La Mettrie, however, there was no biological differ­ence.

He claims that there is both a hierar­chical and non-hi­era­rchical structure in the universe:
-> hierar­chical in the way that man is the most perfect one, as he is the only substance in the universe
-> non-hi­era­rch­ical: in the way that thinking can be taught and thereby is not better than instinct, hence it cannot make on creature better than the other.
 

Ethics

According to La Mettrie, the law of nature tells us that "it is a feeling which teaches us what we should not do, by what we would not like to be done to us"
-> in other words, we do not need God for religion (and tell us what is good), we need experi­ence, a feeling (e.g. guilt)

He is a hedonist and thus claims that doing good feels good. He also is unreli­gious
According to La Mettrie animals are better than humans:
- animals behave according to the law of nature on instinct
- they have more desires because their lives are less flat (they have less everyday habits and their lives changes more)
- human choose to act bad, but suffer from their conscience
-> because disease can affect one's mind, ill human beings can be less ethically respon­sible

man and animal differ in degree of education

He claims that there is no ethical separation of man-animal

God

La Mettrie was both a Pyrrhonian and a sceptic: "I don't know if god exists, but maybe it is better if He doesn'­t"
He also claimed that religion was destru­ctive and hence it was better not to believe in God

Knowledge

Knowledge comes from instinct and Imagin­ation.
Knowledge starts from simple connec­tions between sound and image
then a separation of parts of the world is made
later a connection between these is made

a practised combin­ation of imagin­ation and education allows for mathem­atics
example process knowledge forming:
a monkey sees a bottle and makes the sound "­ha", when he sees fire he makes the sound "­hi". other monkeys follow his example; bottles are now known as "­ha" and fire as "­hi"