\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}

% Packages
\usepackage{fancyhdr}           % For header and footer
\usepackage{multicol}           % Allows multicols in tables
\usepackage{tabularx}           % Intelligent column widths
\usepackage{tabulary}           % Used in header and footer
\usepackage{hhline}             % Border under tables
\usepackage{graphicx}           % For images
\usepackage{xcolor}             % For hex colours
%\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}    % For unicode character support
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}        % Without this we get weird character replacements
\usepackage{colortbl}           % For coloured tables
\usepackage{setspace}           % For line height
\usepackage{lastpage}           % Needed for total page number
\usepackage{seqsplit}           % Splits long words.
%\usepackage{opensans}          % Can't make this work so far. Shame. Would be lovely.
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}     % For underlining links
% Most of the following are not required for the majority
% of cheat sheets but are needed for some symbol support.
\usepackage{amsmath}            % Symbols
\usepackage{MnSymbol}           % Symbols
\usepackage{wasysym}            % Symbols
%\usepackage[english,german,french,spanish,italian]{babel}              % Languages

% Document Info
\author{rentasticco}
\pdfinfo{
  /Title (problem-solving-decision-making-reasoning.pdf)
  /Creator (Cheatography)
  /Author (rentasticco)
  /Subject (Problem Solving, Decision Making, Reasoning Cheat Sheet)
}

% Lengths and widths
\addtolength{\textwidth}{6cm}
\addtolength{\textheight}{-1cm}
\addtolength{\hoffset}{-3cm}
\addtolength{\voffset}{-2cm}
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.2cm} % Space between columns
\setlength{\headsep}{-12pt} % Reduce space between header and content
\setlength{\headheight}{85pt} % If less, LaTeX automatically increases it
\renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0pt} % Remove footer line
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt} % Remove header line
\renewcommand{\seqinsert}{\ifmmode\allowbreak\else\-\fi} % Hyphens in seqsplit
% This two commands together give roughly
% the right line height in the tables
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
\onehalfspacing

% Commands
\newcommand{\SetRowColor}[1]{\noalign{\gdef\RowColorName{#1}}\rowcolor{\RowColorName}} % Shortcut for row colour
\newcommand{\mymulticolumn}[3]{\multicolumn{#1}{>{\columncolor{\RowColorName}}#2}{#3}} % For coloured multi-cols
\newcolumntype{x}[1]{>{\raggedright}p{#1}} % New column types for ragged-right paragraph columns
\newcommand{\tn}{\tabularnewline} % Required as custom column type in use

% Font and Colours
\definecolor{HeadBackground}{HTML}{333333}
\definecolor{FootBackground}{HTML}{666666}
\definecolor{TextColor}{HTML}{333333}
\definecolor{DarkBackground}{HTML}{287532}
\definecolor{LightBackground}{HTML}{F1F6F2}
\renewcommand{\familydefault}{\sfdefault}
\color{TextColor}

% Header and Footer
\pagestyle{fancy}
\fancyhead{} % Set header to blank
\fancyfoot{} % Set footer to blank
\fancyhead[L]{
\noindent
\begin{multicols}{3}
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{C}
    \SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
    \vspace{-7pt}
    {\parbox{\dimexpr\textwidth-2\fboxsep\relax}{\noindent
        \hspace*{-6pt}\includegraphics[width=5.8cm]{/web/www.cheatography.com/public/images/cheatography_logo.pdf}}
    }
\end{tabulary}
\columnbreak
\begin{tabulary}{11cm}{L}
    \vspace{-2pt}\large{\bf{\textcolor{DarkBackground}{\textrm{Problem Solving, Decision Making, Reasoning Cheat Sheet}}}} \\
    \normalsize{by \textcolor{DarkBackground}{rentasticco} via \textcolor{DarkBackground}{\uline{cheatography.com/177906/cs/46148/}}}
\end{tabulary}
\end{multicols}}

\fancyfoot[L]{ \footnotesize
\noindent
\begin{multicols}{3}
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{LL}
  \SetRowColor{FootBackground}
  \mymulticolumn{2}{p{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cheatographer}}  \\
  \vspace{-2pt}rentasticco \\
  \uline{cheatography.com/rentasticco} \\
  \end{tabulary}
\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{L}
  \SetRowColor{FootBackground}
  \mymulticolumn{1}{p{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cheat Sheet}}  \\
   \vspace{-2pt}Published 19th April, 2025.\\
   Updated 19th April, 2025.\\
   Page {\thepage} of \pageref{LastPage}.
\end{tabulary}
\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{L}
  \SetRowColor{FootBackground}
  \mymulticolumn{1}{p{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Sponsor}}  \\
  \SetRowColor{white}
  \vspace{-5pt}
  %\includegraphics[width=48px,height=48px]{dave.jpeg}
  Measure your website readability!\\
  www.readability-score.com
\end{tabulary}
\end{multicols}}




\begin{document}
\raggedright
\raggedcolumns

% Set font size to small. Switch to any value
% from this page to resize cheat sheet text:
% www.emerson.emory.edu/services/latex/latex_169.html
\footnotesize % Small font.

\begin{multicols*}{2}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{1. Definition of a Problem in Cognitive Psychology}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{A problem is defined as any situation in which a person has a goal but does not immediately know the best way to reach it.\{\{nl\}\}  It involves a gap between the current state and the desired goal state, with no obvious path to bridge the gap.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Key Components of a Problem}}} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 1)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Initial State: The current, unsatisfactory situation.\{\{nl\}\}  Goal State: The desired outcome or solution.\{\{nl\}\}  Obstacles: The limitations or constraints that prevent easy movement from the initial to the goal state.\{\{nl\}\}  Operators: The available actions or tools that can be used to move toward the goal.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 7)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Criteria That Make Something a "Problem":}}} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 1)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Lack of an immediate solution: If the answer is obvious or automatic, it is not a problem in the cognitive sense.\{\{nl\}\}  Requires cognitive effort: The individual must think, strategize, or analyze.\{\{nl\}\}  Goal-directedness: There must be an intended outcome or objective.\{\{nl\}\}  Involves decision-making and uncertainty: Solutions are not always clear-cut.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 23 (+ 8)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Algorithms in Cognitive Psychology}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Definition of Algorithm}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{An algorithm is a systematic, rule-based procedure used to solve a problem. It involves a sequence of operations that, when followed correctly, guarantees a correct solution.\{\{nl\}\} In cognitive psychology, algorithms are studied as one of the structured methods humans may (rarely) use to solve well-defined problems.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 7)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Key Properties of Algorithms}}} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 1)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Step-by-step: Each action follows logically from the previous one.\{\{nl\}\}  Exhaustive: All possible pathways are considered.\{\{nl\}\}  Rule-governed: Operates under fixed, pre-determined rules.\{\{nl\}\}  Solution-guaranteed: If a solution exists, the algorithm will find it.\{\{nl\}\}  Often computationally expensive: May require a lot of time and mental effort.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 17 (+ 8)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Role of Algorithms in Human Cognition}}} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 1)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{While algorithms are infallible in theory, humans do not always use them due to cognitive limitations like attention, working memory load, or time pressure.\{\{nl\}\} Nonetheless, algorithms are important in modeling cognitive processes such as logical reasoning, mathematical problem solving, and scientific thinking.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 7)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Related Concepts:}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Cognitive load: Mental effort needed to solve a problem.\{\{nl\}\}  Insight: Sudden realization of a solution.\{\{nl\}\}  Problem representation: The way a problem is mentally structured can affect ease of solving.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Algorithms vs Heuristics in Cognitive Psychology}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Heuristics are mental shortcuts. Unlike algorithms, they do not guarantee a correct solution but are faster and often used by humans in real-world decisions.\{\{nl\}\} Cognitive psychologists often compare algorithms (ideal problem-solving) with heuristics (actual strategies people use).\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Theoretical Frameworks and Research}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Newell and Simon's Information-Processing Approach}} (1972):\{\{nl\}\} Introduced the General Problem Solver, a computer program simulating algorithmic reasoning. It illustrated how humans could hypothetically approach problems algorithmically, though in practice they often used heuristics.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Herbert Simon's Bounded Rationality}}:\{\{nl\}\} Highlighted that while algorithms represent ideal rationality, humans operate within cognitive limits. This makes purely algorithmic thinking rare in day-to-day decision-making.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 5)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller)}}:\{\{nl\}\} Emphasizes that high working memory demand reduces the likelihood of using algorithmic methods unless the individual is highly practiced.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 4)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Gestalt Psychology (Early Foundations)}}:\{\{nl\}\} While not focused on algorithms, the Gestaltists emphasized insight in problem solving—an alternative to stepwise logic. This contrast laid early groundwork for comparing algorithms with non-linear problem-solving.} \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Summary (Algorithms)}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Algorithms represent the ideal of rational, structured problem solving. They are essential to understanding how problem solving could work in optimal cognitive systems. However, due to human limitations, algorithms are often replaced by quicker, intuitive heuristics in real-world situations. Nonetheless, they remain central to modeling cognitive processes and developing AI systems.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 8)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Insight Learning}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Definition}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Insight learning refers to the sudden realization of a problem's solution without the use of trial-and-error. It involves a cognitive reorganization of information leading to an "Aha!" or "Eureka" moment.} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 5)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Theorist: Wolfgang K{\"o}hler\{\{nl\}\} K{\"o}hler was a Gestalt psychologist who emphasized that perception and understanding are holistic. His work with chimpanzees laid the foundation for insight as a distinct form of learning.} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 5)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Key Characteristics}}} \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 1)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Suddenness: The solution appears abruptly rather than through gradual attempts.\{\{nl\}\}  Perceptual Reorganization: The problem is viewed in a new way, revealing the solution.\{\{nl\}\}  No Overt Trial-and-Error: Unlike Thorndike's animals, subjects do not randomly try different methods.\{\{nl\}\}  Transfer of Learning: Once insight is achieved, it can be applied to similar problems.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 8)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{K{\"o}hler's Experiments}}} \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 1)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Conducted on chimpanzees in the Canary Islands.\{\{nl\}\}  In one study, a banana was placed out of reach, and chimpanzees used sticks or stacked boxes to retrieve it.\{\{nl\}\}  The animals did not solve the problem by repeated random attempts; instead, they paused and then acted with purpose, suggesting cognitive restructuring.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 7)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Cognitive Explanation}}} \tn 
% Row Count 29 (+ 1)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Involves accessing previously unconnected elements in memory and restructuring them.\{\{nl\}\}  The solution often comes after a period of incubation — a temporary break from conscious problem-solving.\{\{nl\}\}  Insight is associated with higher-order cognitive functions such as abstraction, pattern recognition, and divergent thinking.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 36 (+ 7)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Insight Learning (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Relevance to Cognitive Psychology}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Supports the idea that learning is not always linear or behaviorally observable.\{\{nl\}\}  Provides evidence against purely behaviorist models of learning.\{\{nl\}\}  Related to creative thinking, complex problem solving, and real-life innovation.} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 5)
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Neuroimaging studies show right hemisphere involvement (especially anterior temporal lobe) during insight.\{\{nl\}\}  Insight is now studied alongside intuitive decision-making and creativity research.} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 4)
% Row 12
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Applications}}} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 1)
% Row 13
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Educational strategies that promote deep understanding over memorization.\{\{nl\}\}  Problem solving in design thinking, innovation, therapy, and scientific discovery.\{\{nl\}\}  Used to explain sudden clarity in problem-based learning environments.} \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 5)
% Row 14
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Contrast with Other Learning Models}}} \tn 
% Row Count 17 (+ 1)
% Row 15
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Vs. Trial-and-Error Learning: Insight does not involve repeated failure before success.\{\{nl\}\}  Vs. Operant Conditioning: Insight is not reinforced incrementally; it emerges through internal processing.} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 5)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.92 cm} x{4.08 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Types of Heuristics}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Core Types} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Availability Heuristic}} & Judging the likelihood of an event based on how easily examples come to mind.\{\{nl\}\} Example: Overestimating plane crashes after seeing news coverage.\{\{nl\}\} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 8)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Representativeness Heuristic}} & Evaluating probabilities by comparing how similar an instance is to a prototype.\{\{nl\}\} Example: Assuming someone is a librarian because they are quiet and introverted.\{\{nl\}\} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 9)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic}} & Making estimates by starting from an initial value (anchor) and adjusting, often insufficiently.\{\{nl\}\} Example: Being influenced by the first price offered in a negotiation.\{\{nl\}\} \tn 
% Row Count 27 (+ 9)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Other Common Heuristics} \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 1)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Recognition Heuristic}} & Preferring options that are recognized over those that are not, especially when knowledge is limited. \tn 
% Row Count 34 (+ 6)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.92 cm} x{4.08 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Types of Heuristics (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Simulation Heuristic}} & Judging the likelihood of an event based on how easily one can imagine it happening. \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Affect Heuristic}} & Making decisions based on emotional responses rather than detailed analysis. \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 4)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Fluency Heuristic}} & Assuming that information processed more fluently (e.g., read more easily) is more accurate or important. \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Means-Ends Analysis}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Definition:}}\{\{nl\}\} Means-Ends Analysis (MEA) is a problem-solving strategy used to reduce the difference between a current situation and a desired goal by breaking the problem into smaller subgoals.} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Origin:}}} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 1)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Developed by Newell and Simon in the 1950s.\{\{nl\}\}  Based on the idea that people solve problems by identifying differences between the present state and the goal state.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 4)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Core Idea:}}} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 1)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Compare the current state with the goal state.\{\{nl\}\}  Identify the biggest difference.\{\{nl\}\}  Choose an action (means) to reduce that difference.\{\{nl\}\}  If the action can't be applied directly, set a new subgoal to achieve conditions that allow the action.\{\{nl\}\}  Repeat the process until the goal is reached.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 7)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Steps in Means-Ends analysis}}} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 1)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Identify the current state.\{\{nl\}\}  Identify the goal state.\{\{nl\}\}  Determine the difference(s) between the two.\{\{nl\}\}  Select the most significant difference.\{\{nl\}\}  Find an operator (action) to reduce that difference.\{\{nl\}\}  If the operator can't be applied, create a subgoal to make it applicable.\{\{nl\}\}  Apply the operator and update the current state.\{\{nl\}\}  Repeat the steps until the goal is achieved.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 9)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Example}}} \tn 
% Row Count 29 (+ 1)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Problem: You want to bake a cake, but you have no eggs.\{\{nl\}\}  Current state: No eggs.\{\{nl\}\}  Goal state: Have a cake.\{\{nl\}\}  Difference: Missing eggs.\{\{nl\}\}  Operator: Go to the store and buy eggs.\{\{nl\}\}  Subgoal: Get money, go to store.\{\{nl\}\}  Apply operator, return with eggs.\{\{nl\}\}  Now you can bake the cake.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 36 (+ 7)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Means-Ends Analysis (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Advantages}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Helps structure problem-solving.\{\{nl\}\}  Breaks down complex problems into manageable parts.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 3)
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Limitations}}} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 1)
% Row 12
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Can be inefficient if the subgoals are not well chosen.\{\{nl\}\}  Assumes the problem solver can correctly identify and apply operators.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 3)
% Row 13
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{This method of problem solving comes under the information processing approach to problem solving}}} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 3)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{General Problem Solver (GPS)}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Definition:}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{The General Problem Solver (GPS) is a computer program developed in the 1950s to simulate human problem-solving.\{\{nl\}\} It uses logical steps and rules to solve well-defined problems by mimicking human cognitive strategies.} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 5)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Developed By:}}} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 1)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Allen Newell\{\{nl\}\}  Herbert A. Simon\{\{nl\}\}  J.C. Shaw\{\{nl\}\} (1957)} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 2)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Purpose:}}} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 1)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{To model how humans solve problems.\{\{nl\}\}  To serve as a universal problem-solving engine for AI and psychology research.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 3)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{How GPS Works:}}} \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 1)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Define the problem (initial state, goal state, and rules).\{\{nl\}\}  Analyze the difference between the current and goal states.\{\{nl\}\}  Select an operator to reduce the difference.\{\{nl\}\}  If the operator can't be used, set a subgoal to make it usable.\{\{nl\}\}  Apply the operator and update the current state.\{\{nl\}\}  Repeat until the goal is reached.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 8)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Strengths:}}} \tn 
% Row Count 23 (+ 1)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{First program to separate problem-solving method from problem content.\{\{nl\}\}  Helped lay the foundation for symbolic AI.\{\{nl\}\}  Modeled human-like reasoning.} \tn 
% Row Count 27 (+ 4)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Limitations}}} \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 1)
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Could only solve well-structured problems (with clear rules and goals).\{\{nl\}\}  Not effective for real-world or ill-structured problems.\{\{nl\}\}  Required a lot of predefined information.} \tn 
% Row Count 32 (+ 4)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Analogical Problem Solving}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Definition:}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Analogical problem solving is a strategy where a person solves a new problem (target problem) by referring to a previously solved problem (source problem) that is structurally similar.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\} It involves mapping relationships from the known to the unknown.} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 6)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Key Steps in Analogical Problem Solving}}} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 1)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Noticing a Relational Similarity\{\{nl\}\}  Recognizing that the current problem is similar to one you've seen before.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}  Retrieving a Source Problem\{\{nl\}\}  Recalling a past situation that resembles the current one.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}  Mapping Corresponding Elements\{\{nl\}\}  Aligning the structure of the old problem with the new one.\{\{nl\}\}  Identifying which elements play similar roles.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}  Applying the Mapping\{\{nl\}\}  Using the solution from the old problem to address the new problem.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 11)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Classic Experiment Example}}\{\{nl\}\} Gick \& Holyoak (1980s) – The Radiation Problem} \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 2)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Participants were given a difficult medical problem.\{\{nl\}\}  If previously told a structurally similar story (attacking a fortress with small forces from different sides), they were more likely to solve it.\{\{nl\}\}  Key finding: Analogical transfer improves when people are explicitly told to compare stories.} \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 7)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{ Types of Analogies}}} \tn 
% Row Count 29 (+ 1)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Surface analogy: Similar in details but not in structure.\{\{nl\}\}  Structural analogy: Similar in underlying relationship — more useful for problem solving.} \tn 
% Row Count 33 (+ 4)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Analogical Problem Solving (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Why It's Important}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Promotes creative problem solving.\{\{nl\}\}  Helps transfer knowledge across domains.\{\{nl\}\}  Essential in learning, reasoning, and intelligence.} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 3)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Strengths}}} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 1)
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Encourages flexible thinking\{\{nl\}\}  Aids in solving novel or unfamiliar problems\{\{nl\}\}  Builds on past experience and knowledge} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 3)
% Row 12
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Limitations}}} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 1)
% Row 13
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{People often focus on surface features, not deeper structure\{\{nl\}\}  May fail if analogy is inappropriate or misleading\{\{nl\}\}  Requires prior experience with relevant problems} \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 4)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Types of Problems in Cognitive Psychology:}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Well-Defined Problems}}:\{\{nl\}\}  Clear initial state, goal, and rules (e.g., solving a math equation).\{\{nl\}\}  {\bf{Ill-Defined Problems}}:\{\{nl\}\}  Ambiguous or unclear goals and solutions (e.g., designing a career plan).\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Stages of Problem Solving}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Problem Identification}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Recognizing that a problem exists.\{\{nl\}\}  Distinguishing between the current situation and the desired goal.\{\{nl\}\}  Requires attention, perception, and sometimes intuition.\{\{nl\}\}  Example: Realizing you can't submit an assignment because your file is corrupted.} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 6)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Problem Representation (or Understanding the Problem)}}} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 2)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Mentally organizing the elements of the problem.\{\{nl\}\}  Involves creating a "problem space" with possible states and transitions.\{\{nl\}\}  Good representation often simplifies the problem.\{\{nl\}\}  Example: Drawing a diagram or making a flowchart to visualize relationships.} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 6)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Strategy Formulation}}} \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 1)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Deciding how to approach the problem.\{\{nl\}\}  Choosing between strategies like trial and error, heuristics, or algorithms.\{\{nl\}\}  Involves planning, goal-setting, and sometimes setting subgoals.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 4)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Organization of Information}}} \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 1)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Sorting relevant and irrelevant data.\{\{nl\}\}  Grouping information based on patterns, categories, or importance.\{\{nl\}\}  Helps reduce cognitive load and improve focus.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 4)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Resource Allocation}}} \tn 
% Row Count 26 (+ 1)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Assessing time, energy, attention, and tools required.\{\{nl\}\}  Determining how much effort or what external help might be needed.\{\{nl\}\}  Example: Deciding whether to solve the problem now or postpone it for later.} \tn 
% Row Count 31 (+ 5)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Stages of Problem Solving (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Monitoring (or Progress Tracking)}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Continuously checking if the strategy is working.\{\{nl\}\}  Adjusting methods or correcting errors along the way.\{\{nl\}\}  Metacognition (thinking about one's own thinking) plays a big role here.} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 4)
% Row 12
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Evaluation (or Reviewing the Outcome)}}} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 1)
% Row 13
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Reflecting on the solution: did it work?\{\{nl\}\}  Assessing the outcome against the original goal.\{\{nl\}\}  Learning from mistakes and successes to improve future problem solving.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 4)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cognitive Processing Involved:}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Representation: Mental model or schema of the problem.\{\{nl\}\}  Planning and strategizing: Selecting and organizing steps.\{\{nl\}\}  Monitoring: Keeping track of progress.\{\{nl\}\}  Evaluation: Judging if the goal is met or if another approach is needed.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Examples of Problems in Cognitive Contexts:}}} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 1)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Solving a jigsaw puzzle (well-defined)\{\{nl\}\}  Choosing a college major (ill-defined)\{\{nl\}\}  Figuring out how to fix a broken device without instructions\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 4)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Why It Matters in Cognitive Psychology:}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
Problem solving is a core cognitive function that reveals how we learn, reason, and adapt. & Understanding what constitutes a problem helps in designing cognitive tests and therapeutic interventions. \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Key Theorists:}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Allen Newell \& Herbert Simon – Information-processing approach to problem solving.\{\{nl\}\}  Karl Duncker – Insight and functional fixedness.\{\{nl\}\}  Gestalt Psychologists – Emphasis on perception and restructuring in problem solving.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{{\bf{Use of Algorithms in Problem Solving}}}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Algorithms are most useful for:\{\{nl\}\}}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Well-defined problems}}: These have a clear goal, starting point, and rules (e.g., solving a quadratic equation).\{\{nl\}\}  {\bf{Tasks with limited variables:}} Such as number-based puzzles or rule-based logic problems.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 5)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{They are less effective for:}}\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 1)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Time-sensitive situations}}: Where fast approximations are needed over perfect solutions.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\} {\bf{Ill-defined problems:}} Where goals or paths are vague (e.g., resolving interpersonal conflict).\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 5)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Types of Algorithms}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Brute-force search}}: Tries every possible option until the right one is found. Effective but inefficient.\{\{nl\}\}  {\bf{Means-end analysis}}: Compares current state with goal state and takes steps to reduce the difference. Common in both algorithmic and heuristic frameworks.\{\{nl\}\}  {\bf{Recursive algorithms}}: Solves a problem by breaking it down into smaller instances of the same problem. Conceptually aligned with problem decomposition.\{\{nl\}\}  {\bf{Search algorithms in memory}}: Used in modeling retrieval (e.g., serial exhaustive search).\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 11)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Relevance to Cognitive Science and AI}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{In cognitive science and artificial intelligence, algorithms are crucial for simulating problem-solving processes. Cognitive architectures like ACT-R and SOAR are built around rule-based processing models that mimic algorithmic thinking.\{\{nl\}\} These models provide insight into how humans could solve problems if they followed strict computational logic.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 8)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cognitive Conditions for Algorithm Use}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Formal education and training:}} Increases familiarity with algorithmic methods.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 2)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Task structure:}} Problems with clearly defined variables and rules favor algorithmic approaches.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 3)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Motivation for accuracy}}: People are more likely to use algorithms when stakes are high.} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 2)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Supportive environment:}} Tools like pen-and-paper, calculators, or structured formats facilitate algorithm use.} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 3)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Limitations in Human Use of Algorithms\{\{nl\}\}}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Working memory constraints\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Processing speed limitations\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 1)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Susceptibility to fatigue or distraction\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 1)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Tendency toward cognitive economy (favoring fast over correct answers)\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 2)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Definition of Heuristics}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Heuristics are mental shortcuts or informal rules of thumb that people use to make judgments, solve problems, and make decisions quickly and efficiently.\{\{nl\}\} Unlike algorithms, heuristics do not guarantee correct solutions, but they are cognitively economical and often sufficient in everyday contexts.} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 7)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Origins and Development}}} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 1)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{The concept of heuristics became central to cognitive psychology in the 1970s through the work of {\bf{Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman}}, who explored how people systematically deviate from rational judgment.\{\{nl\}\} They identified heuristics as the cognitive tools that lead to biases in judgment and decision making.} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 7)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Why We Use Heuristics}}} \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 1)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Cognitive economy:}} Heuristics reduce mental effort and processing time.\{\{nl\}\}  {\bf{Limited information:}} People often make decisions with incomplete data.\{\{nl\}\}  {\bf{Time pressure}}: Heuristics allow for quick decisions in urgent situations.\{\{nl\}\}  {\bf{Uncertainty:}} Heuristics help navigate ambiguous or novel circumstances.\{\{nl\}\}  {\bf{Adaptive value}}: In many situations, heuristics lead to reasonably accurate outcomes.} \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 9)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Heuristics and Cognitive Biases}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{While heuristics are generally adaptive, they often lead to systematic errors or biases.\{\{nl\}\} Examples of biases arising from heuristics include:} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Confirmation bias (favoring information that confirms prior beliefs)} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 2)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Gambler's fallacy (expecting outcomes to "balance out")} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 2)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Base rate neglect (ignoring statistical base rates in favor of vivid or specific details)} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 2)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Relevance of Heuristics in Problem Solving}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Heuristics often guide initial hypothesis formation and strategy selection in ill-defined problems.\{\{nl\}\} In insight-based or real-world problems, people frequently rely on intuitive rules rather than structured, algorithmic approaches.} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Limitations of Heuristics}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Can lead to biases and errors when used inappropriately} \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 2)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Overreliance may prevent deeper analysis or re-evaluation} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 2)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Often context-dependent — what works well in one domain may fail in another} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 2)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Difficult to detect or correct due to their unconscious, automatic nature} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 2)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Theoretical Frameworks of Heuristics}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Bounded Rationality (Herbert Simon)}}\{\{nl\}\} Humans are "satisficers" rather than optimizers — they seek satisfactory solutions rather than perfect ones, especially when using heuristics.} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Fast and Frugal Heuristics (Gerd Gigerenzer)}}\{\{nl\}\} Contrasts Tversky and Kahneman's error-focused view. Emphasizes that heuristics are often ecologically rational and well-adapted to specific environments.\{\{nl\}\} Argues that under certain conditions, heuristics outperform complex strategies.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 7)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Dual Process Theories}}\{\{nl\}\} Heuristics are typically associated with System 1 thinking — fast, automatic, and intuitive — in contrast to System 2, which is slower and more analytical.\{\{nl\}\} Tversky and Kahneman's System 1/System 2 model is central to understanding how heuristics are deployed in real-time decision making.\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 7)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Functional Fixedness and Mental Set}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
Functional Fixedness & Mental Set \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
The cognitive bias that limits a person to using an object only in the way it is traditionally used. \{\{nl\}\} It prevents people from seeing alternative uses or functions for familiar tools and materials. & The tendency to approach problems using a strategy that has worked in the past, even when a newer, more efficient method is available. \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 11)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
First identified by Karl Duncker in the 1930s. & Theorist: Abraham Luchins (1942) \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 3)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
Classical Experiment: Duncker's Candle Problem\{\{nl\}\}  Participants are given a candle, a box of tacks, and matches.\{\{nl\}\}  The task: Attach the candle to the wall so that it does not drip on the table.\{\{nl\}\}  Many fail to see the box as a platform rather than just a container, illustrating functional fixedness. & Classical Experiment: Luchins' Water Jar Problem\{\{nl\}\}  Participants are taught to use a complex formula (e.g., B - A - 2C) to solve several water jar volume problems.\{\{nl\}\}  Later, when a simpler method is possible, many still use the earlier complex strategy, showing a rigid mental set \tn 
% Row Count 31 (+ 16)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Functional Fixedness and Mental Set (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
Cognitive Explanation:\{\{nl\}\}  Arises from strong object-function associations stored in semantic memory.\{\{nl\}\}  Inhibits divergent thinking and insight-based solutions.\{\{nl\}\}  Reflects how schema and experience can constrain perception of problem elements. & Cognitive Explanation:\{\{nl\}\}  Mental set reflects positive transfer that becomes maladaptive.\{\{nl\}\}  Reliance on familiar schemas blocks more efficient or creative solutions.\{\{nl\}\}  Involves automatization of procedures at the cost of flexibility. \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 13)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
Overcoming Functional Fixedness:\{\{nl\}\}  Reframing or recontextualizing the problem.\{\{nl\}\}  Engaging in conceptual expansion (seeing familiar things in unfamiliar ways).\{\{nl\}\}  Encouraging creativity and flexible thinking. & Reducing Mental Set Effects:\{\{nl\}\}  Training in flexible thinking and metacognition.\{\{nl\}\}  Awareness of cognitive biases.\{\{nl\}\}  Varied practice that discourages rigid rule-following. \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 12)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Relation to Problem Space Theory (Newell \& Simon):\{\{nl\}\}  Mental sets limit the exploration of alternative paths in the problem space.\{\{nl\}\}  They can cause a person to prematurely settle into a fixed path or strategy.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\} \tn 
% Row Count 37 (+ 12)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Dual Process Theory of Thinking}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Definition:}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Dual Process Theory suggests that human thinking operates through two distinct systems:\{\{nl\}\}  System 1: Fast, automatic, intuitive, and emotional.\{\{nl\}\}  System 2: Slow, deliberate, analytical, and logical.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\} This theory explains why we sometimes rely on gut instincts, and other times on careful reasoning.} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 7)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Key Features of the Two Systems}}} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 1)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{System 1}}\{\{nl\}\}  Operates automatically and quickly\{\{nl\}\}  Requires little or no effort\{\{nl\}\}  Based on heuristics (mental shortcuts)\{\{nl\}\}  Emotionally charged and context-dependent\{\{nl\}\}  Examples: Detecting hostility in a voice, driving a familiar route, solving 2 + 2\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 6)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{System 2}}\{\{nl\}\}  Allocates attention to effortful mental activities\{\{nl\}\}  Involves reasoning, logic, planning\{\{nl\}\}  Slower but more reliable\{\{nl\}\}  Used in unfamiliar or complex situations\{\{nl\}\}  Examples: Solving a math problem, evaluating an argument, planning a trip} \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 6)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Theorists}}\{\{nl\}\}  Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky popularized this model in the context of judgment and decision making.\{\{nl\}\}  Kahneman's book "Thinking, Fast and Slow" is a foundational text.} \tn 
% Row Count 26 (+ 5)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Applications of Dual Process Theory}}\{\{nl\}\}  Explains biases and errors in decision-making (System 1 can be misleading)\{\{nl\}\}  Used in cognitive psychology, behavioral economics, and education\{\{nl\}\}  Helps design better problem-solving strategies and interventions} \tn 
% Row Count 32 (+ 6)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Dual Process Theory of Thinking (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Strengths}}\{\{nl\}\}  Explains both quick decisions and complex reasoning\{\{nl\}\}  Supported by research in neuroscience and cognitive science\{\{nl\}\}  Helps account for cognitive biases and heuristics\{\{nl\}\} \{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Limitations}}\{\{nl\}\}  May oversimplify human thought into just two systems\{\{nl\}\}  Real thinking often involves interaction between the two\{\{nl\}\}  Boundaries between systems can blur\{\{nl\}\}} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 4)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}


% That's all folks
\end{multicols*}

\end{document}