\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}

% Packages
\usepackage{fancyhdr}           % For header and footer
\usepackage{multicol}           % Allows multicols in tables
\usepackage{tabularx}           % Intelligent column widths
\usepackage{tabulary}           % Used in header and footer
\usepackage{hhline}             % Border under tables
\usepackage{graphicx}           % For images
\usepackage{xcolor}             % For hex colours
%\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}    % For unicode character support
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}        % Without this we get weird character replacements
\usepackage{colortbl}           % For coloured tables
\usepackage{setspace}           % For line height
\usepackage{lastpage}           % Needed for total page number
\usepackage{seqsplit}           % Splits long words.
%\usepackage{opensans}          % Can't make this work so far. Shame. Would be lovely.
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}     % For underlining links
% Most of the following are not required for the majority
% of cheat sheets but are needed for some symbol support.
\usepackage{amsmath}            % Symbols
\usepackage{MnSymbol}           % Symbols
\usepackage{wasysym}            % Symbols
%\usepackage[english,german,french,spanish,italian]{babel}              % Languages

% Document Info
\author{Hallie Seese (Hallie19)}
\pdfinfo{
  /Title (cogn-emot-soc-dev-infancy-and-toddlerhood.pdf)
  /Creator (Cheatography)
  /Author (Hallie Seese (Hallie19))
  /Subject (Cogn, Emot, + Soc Dev. - Infancy and Toddlerhood Cheat Sheet)
}

% Lengths and widths
\addtolength{\textwidth}{6cm}
\addtolength{\textheight}{-1cm}
\addtolength{\hoffset}{-3cm}
\addtolength{\voffset}{-2cm}
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.2cm} % Space between columns
\setlength{\headsep}{-12pt} % Reduce space between header and content
\setlength{\headheight}{85pt} % If less, LaTeX automatically increases it
\renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0pt} % Remove footer line
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt} % Remove header line
\renewcommand{\seqinsert}{\ifmmode\allowbreak\else\-\fi} % Hyphens in seqsplit
% This two commands together give roughly
% the right line height in the tables
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
\onehalfspacing

% Commands
\newcommand{\SetRowColor}[1]{\noalign{\gdef\RowColorName{#1}}\rowcolor{\RowColorName}} % Shortcut for row colour
\newcommand{\mymulticolumn}[3]{\multicolumn{#1}{>{\columncolor{\RowColorName}}#2}{#3}} % For coloured multi-cols
\newcolumntype{x}[1]{>{\raggedright}p{#1}} % New column types for ragged-right paragraph columns
\newcommand{\tn}{\tabularnewline} % Required as custom column type in use

% Font and Colours
\definecolor{HeadBackground}{HTML}{333333}
\definecolor{FootBackground}{HTML}{666666}
\definecolor{TextColor}{HTML}{333333}
\definecolor{DarkBackground}{HTML}{22ADBD}
\definecolor{LightBackground}{HTML}{F1F9FA}
\renewcommand{\familydefault}{\sfdefault}
\color{TextColor}

% Header and Footer
\pagestyle{fancy}
\fancyhead{} % Set header to blank
\fancyfoot{} % Set footer to blank
\fancyhead[L]{
\noindent
\begin{multicols}{3}
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{C}
    \SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
    \vspace{-7pt}
    {\parbox{\dimexpr\textwidth-2\fboxsep\relax}{\noindent
        \hspace*{-6pt}\includegraphics[width=5.8cm]{/web/www.cheatography.com/public/images/cheatography_logo.pdf}}
    }
\end{tabulary}
\columnbreak
\begin{tabulary}{11cm}{L}
    \vspace{-2pt}\large{\bf{\textcolor{DarkBackground}{\textrm{Cogn, Emot, + Soc Dev. - Infancy and Toddlerhood Cheat Sheet}}}} \\
    \normalsize{by \textcolor{DarkBackground}{Hallie Seese (Hallie19)} via \textcolor{DarkBackground}{\uline{cheatography.com/132584/cs/26943/}}}
\end{tabulary}
\end{multicols}}

\fancyfoot[L]{ \footnotesize
\noindent
\begin{multicols}{3}
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{LL}
  \SetRowColor{FootBackground}
  \mymulticolumn{2}{p{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cheatographer}}  \\
  \vspace{-2pt}Hallie Seese (Hallie19) \\
  \uline{cheatography.com/hallie19} \\
  \end{tabulary}
\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{L}
  \SetRowColor{FootBackground}
  \mymulticolumn{1}{p{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cheat Sheet}}  \\
   \vspace{-2pt}Published 9th March, 2021.\\
   Updated 9th March, 2021.\\
   Page {\thepage} of \pageref{LastPage}.
\end{tabulary}
\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{L}
  \SetRowColor{FootBackground}
  \mymulticolumn{1}{p{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Sponsor}}  \\
  \SetRowColor{white}
  \vspace{-5pt}
  %\includegraphics[width=48px,height=48px]{dave.jpeg}
  Measure your website readability!\\
  www.readability-score.com
\end{tabulary}
\end{multicols}}




\begin{document}
\raggedright
\raggedcolumns

% Set font size to small. Switch to any value
% from this page to resize cheat sheet text:
% www.emerson.emory.edu/services/latex/latex_169.html
\footnotesize % Small font.

\begin{multicols*}{2}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.84 cm} x{4.16 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Piaget's Cognitive Developmental Theory}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{CHAPTER 5} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Jean Piaget}} inspired a vision of children as busy, motivated explorers whose thinking develops as they act directly on the environment} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 3)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{According to Piaget, all aspects of cognition develop in an integrated fashion, changing in a similar way at about the same time as children move through four stages between infancy and adolescence} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 4)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Piaget believed that infants and toddlers "think" with their eyes, ears, hands, and other sensorimotor equipment. They cannot yet carry out many activities inside their heads. But by the end of toddlerhood, children can solve everyday practical problems and represent their experiences in speech, gesture, and play} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 7)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
Piaget's {\bf{\{\{nl\}\}Sensorimotor Stage}} & spans the first two years of life; infants and toddlers "think" with their eyes, ears, hands, and other sensorimotor equipment \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 7)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Piaget's Ideas About Cognitive Change}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{According to Piaget, specific psychological structures—organized ways of making sense of experience called {\bf{schemes}}—change with age} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{At first, schemes are sensorimotor action patterns} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 1)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{For example, at 6 months, Timmy dropped objects in a fairly rigid way, simply letting go of a rattle or teething ring and watching with interest. By 18 months, his "dropping scheme" had become deliberate and creative. In tossing objects down the basement stairs, he threw some in the air, bounced others off walls, released some gently and others forcefully.  Soon, instead of just acting on objects, he will show evidence of thinking before he acts. For Piaget, this change marks the transition from sensorimotor to preoperational thought.} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 11)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{In Piaget's theory, two processes, {\bf{adaptation}} and {\bf{organization}}, account for changes in schemes.} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 3)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Adaptation}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{involves building schemes through direct interaction with the environment. It consists of two complementary activities, {\bf{assimilation}} and {\bf{accommodation}}} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{During {\bf{assimilation}}, we use our current schemes to interpret the external world. For example, when Timmy dropped objects, he was assimilating them to his sensorimotor "dropping scheme."} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 4)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{In {\bf{accommodation}}, we create new schemes or adjust old ones after noticing that our current ways of thinking do not capture the environment completely. When Timmy dropped objects in different ways, he modified his dropping scheme to take account of the varied properties of objects.} \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 6)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{the balance between assimilation and accommodation varies over time. When children are not changing much, they assimilate more than they accommodate—a steady, comfortable state that Piaget called {\bf{cognitive equilibrium}}. During times of rapid cognitive change, children are in a state of {\bf{disequilibrium}}, or {\bf{cognitive discomfort}}. Realizing that new information does not match their current schemes, they shift from assimilation to accommodation. After modifying their schemes, they move back toward assimilation, exercising their newly changed structures until they are ready to be modified again.} \tn 
% Row Count 27 (+ 13)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Each time this back-and-forth movement between equilibrium and disequilibrium occurs, more effective schemes are produced. Because the times of greatest accommodation are the earliest ones, the sensorimotor stage is Piaget's most complex period of development.} \tn 
% Row Count 33 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Organization}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Schemes also change through {\bf{organization}}, a process that occurs internally, apart from direct contact with the environment} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Once children form new schemes, they rearrange them, linking them with other schemes to create a strongly interconnected cognitive system. For example, eventually Timmy will relate "dropping" to "throwing" and to his developing understanding of "nearness" and "farness." According to Piaget, schemes truly reach equilibrium when they become part of a broad network of structures that can be jointly applied to the surrounding world} \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 9)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{The Sensorimotor Stage}}  \tn
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{p{8.4cm}}{\vspace{1px}\centerline{\includegraphics[width=5.1cm]{/web/www.cheatography.com/public/uploads/hallie19_1615208678_Chapter_05_Table01.png}}} \tn 
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Piaget divided the sensorimotor stage into six substages}} \newline According to Piaget, at birth infants know so little that they cannot explore purposefully \newline The circular reaction provides a special means of adapting their first schemes. It involves stumbling onto a new experience caused by the baby's own motor activity. The reaction is "circular" because, as the infant tries to repeat the event again and again, a sensorimotor response that first occurred by chance strengthens into a new scheme}  \tn 
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Piaget's Sensorimotor Substages}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{In {\bf{Substage 1}}, babies suck, grasp, and look in much the same way, no matter what experiences they encounter} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Around 1 month, as they enter {\bf{Substage 2}}, infants start to gain voluntary control over their actions through the {\bf{primary circular reaction}}, by repeating chance behaviors largely motivated by basic needs. This leads to some simple motor habits, such as sucking their fist or thumb. Babies also begin to vary their behavior in response to environmental demands} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 8)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{During {\bf{Substage 3}}, from 4 to 8 months, infants sit up and reach for and manipulate objects. These motor attainments strengthen the {\bf{secondary circular reaction}}, through which babies try to repeat interesting events in the surrounding environment that are caused by their own actions} \tn 
% Row Count 17 (+ 6)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{In {\bf{Substage 4}}, 8- to 12-month-olds combine schemes into new, more complex action sequences. As a result, actions that lead to the mouth or happening to hit the toy. Instead, 8- to 12-month-olds can engage in {\bf{intentional, or goal-directed, behavior}}, coordinating schemes deliberately to solve simple problems. Consider Piaget's famous {\bf{object-hiding task}}, in which he shows the baby an attractive toy and then hides it behind his hand or under a cover. Infants of this substage can find the object by coordinating two schemes—"pushing" aside the obstacle and "grasping" the toy. Piaget regarded these means–end action sequences as the foundation for all problem solving} \tn 
% Row Count 31 (+ 14)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Piaget's Sensorimotor Substages (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Retrieving hidden objects reveals that infants have begun to master {\bf{object permanence,}} the understanding that objects continue to exist when out of sight. But babies still make the {\bf{A-not-B search error}}: If they reach several times for an object at a first hiding place (A), then see it moved to a second (B), they still search for it in the first hiding place (A).} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 8)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Infants in {\bf{Substage 4}}, who can better anticipate events, sometimes use their capacity for intentional behavior to try to change those events. Also, babies can now {\bf{imitate behaviors}} slightly different from those they usually perform. After watching someone else, they try to stir with a spoon or push a toy car} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 7)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{In {\bf{Substage 5}}, from 12 to 18 months, the {\bf{tertiary circular reaction}}, in which toddlers repeat behaviors with variation, emerges. This deliberately exploratory approach makes 12- to 18-month-olds better problem solvers. According to Piaget, the capacity to experiment leads toddlers to look for a hidden toy in several locations, displaying an {\bf{accurate A–B search}}. Their more flexible action patterns also permit them to imitate many more behaviors.} \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 10)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Substage 6}} brings the ability to create {\bf{mental representations}}—internal depictions of information that the mind can manipulate. Our most powerful mental representations are of two kinds: {\bf{(1) images}}, or mental pictures of objects, people, and spaces; and {\bf{(2) concepts}}, or categories in which similar objects or events are grouped together. We use a mental image to retrace our steps when we've misplaced something or to imitate someone's behavior long after observing it. By thinking in concepts and labeling them (for example, "ball" for all rounded, movable objects used in play), we become more efficient thinkers, organizing our diverse experiences into meaningful, manageable, and memorable units. - Representation enables older toddlers to solve advanced object permanence problems involving invisible displacement—finding a toy moved while out of sight, such as into a small box while under a cover. It also permits {\bf{deferred imitation}}—the ability to remember and copy the behavior of models who are not present. And it makes possible make-believe play, in which children act out everyday and imaginary activities. As the sensorimotor stage draws to a close, mental symbols have become major instruments of thinking.} \tn 
% Row Count 51 (+ 26)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Object Permanence}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Many studies suggest that infants display a wide array of understandings earlier than Piaget believed} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{newborns sucked vigorously on a nipple to gain access to interesting sights and sounds. This behavior, which closely resembles {\bf{Piaget's secondary circular reaction}}, shows that infants explore and control the external world long before 4 to 8 months. In fact, they do so as soon as they are born} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 6)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{To discover what infants know about hidden objects and other aspects of physical reality, researchers often use {\bf{the violation-of-expectation method}}. They may habituate babies to a physical event (expose them to the event until their looking declines) to familiarize them with a situation in which their knowledge will be tested. Or they may simply show babies an expected event (one that is consistent with reality) and an unexpected event (a variation of the first event that violates reality)} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 10)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Heightened attention to the unexpected event suggests that the infant is "surprised" by a deviation from physical reality and, therefore, is aware of that aspect of the physical world.} \tn 
% Row Count 23 (+ 4)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{The {\bf{violation-of-expectation method}} is controversial. Some researchers believe that it indicates limited, implicit (nonconscious) awareness of physical events—not the \{\{nl\}\}full-blown, conscious understanding that was Piaget's focus in requiring infants to act on their surroundings, as in searching for hidden objects. Others maintain that the method reveals only babies' perceptual preference for novelty, not their knowledge of the physical world} \tn 
% Row Count 33 (+ 10)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Object Permanence (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{infants exposed to both an expected and an unexpected object-hiding event looked longer at the unexpected event} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Additional {\bf{violation-of-expectation}} studies yielded similar results, suggesting that infants look longer at a wide variety of unexpected events involving hidden objects} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 4)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Another type of looking behavior suggests that young infants are aware that objects persist when out of view. Four- and 5-month-olds will track a ball's path of movement as it disappears and reappears from behind a barrier, even gazing ahead to where they expect it to emerge. With age, babies are more likely to fixate on the predicted place of the ball's reappearance and wait for it—evidence of an increasingly secure grasp of {\bf{object permanence}}} \tn 
% Row Count 17 (+ 10)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Once 8- to 12-month-olds search for hidden objects, they make the {\bf{A-not-B search error}}} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 2)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{A more comprehensive explanation is that a complex, dynamic system of factors—having built a habit of reaching toward A, continuing to look at A, having the hiding place at B appear similar to the one at A, and maintaining a constant body posture—increases the chances that the baby will make {\bf{the A-not-B search error}}. Disrupting any one of these factors increases 10-month-olds' accurate searching at B. In addition, older infants are still perfecting reaching and grasping. If these motor skills are challenging, babies have little attention left to focus on inhibiting their habitual reach toward A} \tn 
% Row Count 32 (+ 13)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Object Permanence (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{infants' understanding of {\bf{object permanence}} becomes increasingly complex with age. Success at object search tasks coincides with rapid development of the frontal lobes of the cerebral cortex. Also crucial are a wide variety of experiences perceiving, acting on, and remembering objects} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Mental Representation}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{In {\bf{Piaget's theory}}, before about 18 months of age, infants are unable to mentally represent experience. Yet 8- to 10-month-olds' ability to recall the location of hidden objects after delays of more than a minute, and 14-month-olds' recall after delays of a day or more, indicate that babies construct {\bf{mental representations}} of objects and their whereabouts. And in studies of {\bf{deferred imitation and problem solving}}, representational thought is evident even earlier} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 10)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Deferred and Inferred Imitation}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Piaget studied {\bf{deferred imitation}} by noting when his three children demonstrated it in their everyday behavior. But laboratory research suggests that it is present at 6 weeks of age! Infants who watched an unfamiliar adult's facial expression imitated it when exposed to the same adult the next day} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 7)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{As motor capacities improve, infants copy actions with objects. In one study, an adult showed 6- and 9-month-olds a {\bf{novel series of actions}} with a puppet. When tested a day later, infants who had seen the novel actions were far more likely to imitate them} \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 6)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{And when researchers paired a second, motionless puppet with the first puppet 1 to 6 days before the demonstration, 6- to 9-month-olds generalized the novel actions to this new, very different-looking puppet} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 5)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Between 12 and 18 months, toddlers use {\bf{deferred imitation}} to enrich their sensorimotor schemes. They retain modeled behaviors for at least several months, copy the actions of peers as well as adults, and imitate across a change in context—for example, enact at home a behavior seen at child care. The ability to recall modeled behaviors in the order they occurred—evident as early as 6 months—also strengthens over the second year. And when toddlers imitate in correct sequence, they remember more behaviors} \tn 
% Row Count 29 (+ 11)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Older infants and toddlers even imitate rationally, by inferring others' intentions. They are more likely to imitate purposeful than arbitrary behaviors on objects. And they adapt their imitative acts to a model's goals. If 12-month-olds see an adult perform an unusual action for fun (make a toy dog enter a miniature house by jumping through the chimney, even though its door is wide open), they copy the behavior. But if the adult engages in the odd behavior because she must (makes the dog go through the chimney after first trying the door and finding it locked), 12-month-olds typically imitate the more efficient action (putting the dog through the door). Between 14 and 18 months, toddlers become increasingly adept at imitating actions an adult tries to produce, even if these are not fully realized. On one occasion, Ginette attempted to pour some raisins into a bag but missed, spilling them. A moment later, Grace began dropping the raisins into the bag, indicating that she had inferred Ginette's goal} \tn 
% Row Count 50 (+ 21)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Problem Solving}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{As Piaget indicated, around 7 to 8 months, infants develop {\bf{intentional means–end action sequences}} that they use to solve simple problems, such as pulling on a cloth to obtain a toy resting on its far end} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Out of these explorations of object-to-object relations, the capacity for tool use in problem solving—flexibly manipulating an object as a means to a goal—emerges} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 4)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{By 10 to 12 months, infants can solve problems by analogy—apply a solution strategy from one problem to other relevant problems. In one study, babies of this age were given three similar problems, each requiring them to overcome a barrier, grasp a string, and pull it to get an attractive toy. The problems differed in many aspects of their superficial features—texture and color of the string, barrier, and floor mat and type of toy (horse, doll, or car). For the first problem, the parent demonstrated the solution and encouraged the infant to imitate. Babies obtained the toy more readily with each additional problem.} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 13)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{These findings suggest that at the end of the first year, infants form flexible {\bf{mental representations}} of how to use tools to get objects. They have some ability to move beyond trial-and-error experimentation, represent a solution mentally, and use it in new contexts} \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Symbolic Understanding}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{One of the most momentous early attainments is the realization that words can be used to cue mental images of things not physically present—a symbolic capacity called {\bf{displaced reference}} that emerges around the first birthday. It greatly enhances toddlers' capacity to learn about the world through communicating with others. Observations of 12- to 13-month-olds reveal that they respond to the label of an absent toy by looking at and gesturing toward the spot where it usually rests} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 10)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{But at first, toddlers have difficulty using language to acquire new information about an absent object. In one study, an adult taught 19- and 22-month-olds a name for a stuffed animal—"Lucy" for a frog. Then, with the frog out of sight, each toddler was told that some water had spilled, so "Lucy's all wet!" Finally, the adult showed the toddler three stuffed animals—a wet frog, a dry frog, and a pig—and said, "Get Lucy!"} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 9)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Although all the children remembered that Lucy was a frog, only the 22-month-olds identified the wet frog as Lucy. This {\bf{capacity to use language as a flexible symbolic tool—to modify and enrich existing mental \seqsplit{representations—improves} into the preschool years}}} \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 6)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{A beginning {\bf{awareness of the symbolic function of pictures}} also emerges in the first year, strengthening in the second. By 9 months, the majority of infants touch, rub, or pat a color photo of an object but rarely try to grasp it} \tn 
% Row Count 30 (+ 5)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Symbolic Understanding (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{These behaviors suggest that 9-month-olds do not mistake a picture for the real thing, though they may not yet comprehend it as a symbol. By the middle of the second year, toddlers clearly treat pictures symbolically, as long as pictures strongly resemble real objects. After hearing a novel label ("blicket") applied to a color photo of an unfamiliar object, most 15- to 24-month-olds—when presented with both the real object and its picture and asked to indicate the "blicket"—gave a symbolic response. They selected either the real object or both the object and its picture, not the picture alone.} \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 13)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{toddlers often use pictures as vehicles for communicating with others and acquiring new knowledge. Picture-rich environments in which caregivers frequently direct babies' attention to the link between pictures and real objects promote pictorial understanding.} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Social Issues: Education}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Children first become TV and video viewers in early infancy, as they are exposed to programs watched by parents and older siblings or to shows aimed at baby viewers, such as the Baby Einstein products. U.S. parents report that 50 percent of 2-month-olds watch TV, a figure that rises to 90 percent by 2 years of age. Average viewing time increases from 55 minutes per day at 6 months to just under 1$\frac{1}{2}$ hours per day at age 2 Initially, {\bf{infants respond to videos of people as if viewing people directly—smiling, moving their arms and legs, and (by 6 months) imitating actions of a televised adult}}} \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 13)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{But when shown videos of attractive toys, 9-month-olds touch and grab at the screen, suggesting that they confuse the images with the real thing. By the middle of the second year, {\bf{manual exploration declines}} in favor of pointing at the images} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 5)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Nevertheless, {\bf{toddlers have difficulty applying what they see on video to real situations}}} \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 2)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{In a series of studies, some 2-year-olds watched through a window while a live adult hid an object in an adjoining room, while others watched the same event on a video screen. Children in the direct viewing condition retrieved the toy easily; those in the video condition had difficulty} \tn 
% Row Count 26 (+ 6)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{This {\bf{video deficit effect}}—poorer performance after viewing a video than a live demonstration—has also been found for 2-year-olds' deferred imitation, word learning, and means–end problem solving} \tn 
% Row Count 31 (+ 5)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Social Issues: Education (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Around age 2$\frac{1}{2}$, {\bf{the video deficit effect declines}}. Before this age, the{\bf{{\emph{ American Academy of Pediatrics recommends against mass media exposure.}}}} In support of this advice, amount of TV viewing is negatively related to toddlers' language progress. And 1- to 3-year-old heavy viewers tend to have attention, memory, and reading difficulties in the early school years} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 8)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{When toddlers do watch TV and video, it is likely to {\bf{work best as a teaching tool when it is rich in social cues}}. These include use of familiar characters and close-ups in which the character looks directly at the camera, addresses questions to viewers, and pauses to invite a response} \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Evaluation of the Sensorimotor Stage}}  \tn
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{p{8.4cm}}{\vspace{1px}\centerline{\includegraphics[width=5.1cm]{/web/www.cheatography.com/public/uploads/hallie19_1615222870_CSC_Chapter_05_Table02.png}}} \tn 
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Alternative Explanations \newline Unlike Piaget, who thought babies constructed all mental representations out of sensorimotor activity, researchers now believe infants have built-in cognitive equipment for making sense of experience. But disagreement exists over the extent of this understanding. Researchers who lack confidence in the {\bf{violation-of-expectation method}} say that babies cognitive starting point is limited. Together, these capacities enable infants to construct a wide variety of schemes}  \tn 
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Evaluation of the Sensorimotor Stage cont.}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Others, {\bf{convinced by violation-of-expectation findings}}, believe that infants start out with impressive understandings. According to this core knowledge perspective, {\bf{babies are born with a set of innate knowledge systems, or core domains of thought.}} Each of these prewired understandings permits a ready grasp of new, related information and therefore {\bf{supports early, rapid development}}} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 8)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Core knowledge theorists}} argue that infants could not make sense of the complex stimulation around them without having been genetically "set up" in the course of evolution to comprehend its crucial aspects} \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 5)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Researchers have conducted many studies of infants' physical knowledge, including {\bf{object permanence,}} {\bf{object solidity}} (that one object cannot move through another), and {\bf{gravity}} (that an object will fall without support). {\bf{Violation-of-expectation findings suggest that in the first few months, infants have some awareness of all these basic object properties and quickly build on this knowledge}}} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 9)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Core knowledge theorists }}also assume that an inherited foundation of linguistic knowledge enables swift language acquisition in early childhood—a possibility we will consider later in this chapter. Furthermore, {\bf{these theorists argue, infants' early orientation toward people initiates rapid development of psychological knowledge—in particular, understanding of mental states, such as intentions, emotions, desires, and beliefs}}} \tn 
% Row Count 31 (+ 9)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Evaluation of the Sensorimotor Stage cont. (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Research even suggests that infants have basic numerical knowledge.}} In the best-known study, 5-month-olds saw a screen raised to hide a single toy animal and then watched a hand place a second toy behind the screen. Finally, the screen was removed to reveal either one or two toys. {\bf{Infants looked longer at the unexpected, one-toy display, indicating that they kept track of the two objects and were able to add one object to another}}} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 9)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Findings like these {\bf{suggest that babies can discriminate quantities up to three and use that knowledge to perform simple arithmetic—both addition and subtraction}}} \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 4)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Additional {\bf{evidence suggests that 6-month-olds can distinguish among large sets of items, as long as the difference between those sets is very great—at least a factor of two}}. Consequently, some researchers believe that infants can represent approximate large-number values in addition to making small-number discriminations} \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 7)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{As with {\bf{other violation-of-expectation results}}, this {\bf{evidence is controversial}}. Indisputable evidence for built-in core knowledge requires that it be demonstrated at birth or close to it—in the absence of relevant opportunities to learn. Yet evidence on newborns' ability to process small and large numerical values is inconsistent. And critics point out that claims for infants' number knowledge are surprising, in view of other research indicating that before 14 to 16 months, toddlers have difficulty making less-than and greater-than comparisons between small sets. {\bf{Not until the preschool years do children add and subtract small sets correctly}}} \tn 
% Row Count 34 (+ 14)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Evaluation of the Sensorimotor Stage cont. (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{The {\bf{core knowledge perspective}}, while emphasizing native endowment, {\bf{acknowledges that experience is essential for children to extend this initial knowledge. But so far, it has said little about which experiences are most important in each core domain for advancing children's thinking. }}Despite these limitations, core knowledge investigators have sharpened the field's focus on clarifying the starting point for human cognition and on carefully tracking the changes that build on it} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 10)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Piaget's Legacy}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Current research on infant cognition yields broad agreement on two issues. {\bf{First, many cognitive changes of infancy are not abrupt and stagelike but gradual and continuous}}} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Second, rather than developing together, various aspects of infant cognition change unevenly because of the challenges posed by different types of tasks and infants' varying experiences with them.}} These ideas serve as the basis for another major approach to cognitive development—{\bf{information processing}}} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 7)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Piaget's work inspired a wealth of research on infant cognition, including studies that challenged his theory. His observations also have been of great practical value. Teachers and caregivers continue to look to the sensorimotor stage for guidelines on how to create developmentally appropriate environments for infants and toddlers} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 7)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Information Processing}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{information processing}} focuses on many aspects of thinking, including attention, memory, categorization skills, and problem-solving. It often relies on flowcharts to describe human cognitive system} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
First, information enters the {\bf{sensory register}} & sights and sounds are represented directly and stored briefly \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 4)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Short-term memory store}} & attended-to information briefly so we can actively "work on" it to reach our goals \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 5)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{working memory}}: a number of items that can be briefly held in mind while also engaging in some effort to monitor or manipulate those items. Working memory can be thought of as a "mental workspace." \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 11)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Long-term memory}} & permanent knowledge base \tn 
% Row Count 27 (+ 2)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Model of Information Processing}}  \tn
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{p{8.4cm}}{\vspace{1px}\centerline{\includegraphics[width=5.1cm]{/web/www.cheatography.com/public/uploads/hallie19_1615223903_info.png}}} \tn 
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{First, information enters the {\bf{sensory register}}, where sights and sounds are represented directly and stored briefly. The second part of the mind, the {\bf{short-term memory store}}, we retain attended-to information briefly so we can actively "work on" it to reach our goals. The {\bf{central executive}} is where info is acted upon, it is the conscious, reflective part of our mental system insuring that we think purposefully to attain our goals. {\bf{LTM}} is our permanent storage base}  \tn 
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.36 cm} x{4.64 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cognitive Gains in Infancy + Toddlerhood}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Attention}}\{\{nobreak\}\} & improved efficiency, ability to shift focus \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 2)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
 & less attraction to novelty, improved sustained attention \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 3)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & around 2 to 3 months of age, infants visually explore objects and patterns more thoroughly \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 4)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
 & Preterm and newborn babies require a long time—about 3 to 4 minutes—to habituate and recover to novel visual stimuli \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 6)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & But by 4 or 5 months, they need as little as 5 to 10 seconds to take in a complex visual stimulus and recognize it as different from a previous one \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 7)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
 & Over the first year, infants mostly attend to novel and eye-catching events \tn 
% Row Count 26 (+ 4)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & In the second year, as toddlers become increasingly capable of intentional behavior (refer back to Piaget's Substage 4), attraction to novelty declines (but does not disappear) and {\bf{sustained attention increases}} \tn 
% Row Count 36 (+ 10)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.36 cm} x{4.64 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cognitive Gains in Infancy + Toddlerhood (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & A toddler who engages even in simple goal-directed behavior, such as stacking blocks or putting them in a container, must sustain attention to reach the goal. As plans and activities gradually become more complex, the duration of attention increases \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 11)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Memory}} & involves operant conditioning and habituation are involved in early memory \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 4)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & longer retention intervals \tn 
% Row Count 17 (+ 2)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{white}
 & development of recall by second half of first year \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 3)
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Retention of visual events increases dramatically during first 2 years \tn 
% Row Count 24 (+ 4)
% Row 12
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{Recognition}}—noticing when a stimulus is identical or similar to one previously experienced—is the simplest form of memory \tn 
% Row Count 30 (+ 6)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.36 cm} x{4.64 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cognitive Gains in Infancy + Toddlerhood (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 13
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Recall}} involves remembering something not present; by the second half of the first year, babies are capable of it. \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
% Row 14
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Categorization}}\{\{nobreak\}\} & gradual shift from perceptual to conceptual categorization in toddlerhood; grouping of similar events and objects \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 5)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.04 cm} x{4.96 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Development of Categorization}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Perceptual}}\{\{nobreak\}\} & First categories are based on physical properties \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
 & By 6 months, babies categorize on basis of two correlated features \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 3)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Conceptual}}\{\{nobreak\}\} & Shift to categories based on common function or behavior; grouping objects by their common function or behavior \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 5)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
 & Cultural differences in development of categories \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 3)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{young infants can {\bf{categorize}}, grouping similar objects and events into a single representation to help them learn and remember and by the second half of the first year, more categories appear to be based on subtle sets of features. As they gain experience in comparing to-be-categorized items in varied ways and as their store of verbal labels expands, toddlers start to categorize flexibly} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 8)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{By the end of the second year, toddlers' grasp of the {\bf{animate–inanimate distinction}} expands. That is understanding the difference between real and what is not real. Exploration of objects and expanding knowledge of the world contribute to the shift from categorizing based on prominent perceptual features to categorizing on a conceptual basis. This means the toddler uses grouping of similar function or behavior as birds versus airplanes, or cats versus dogs. As adults put labels on objects this calls attention to the differences.} \tn 
% Row Count 33 (+ 11)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Developmentally Appropriate Infant + Toddler Care}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Physical setting}} & Indoor environment is clean, in good repair, well-lighted, well-ventilated, and not overcrowded \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
 & Fenced outdoor play space is available \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 2)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Toys and equipment}}\{\{nobreak\}\} & Play materials are age-appropriate and are stored on low shelves within easy reach \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 5)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
 & Cribs, highchairs, infant seats, and child-sized tables and chairs are available \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 4)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Outdoor equipment includes small riding toys, swings, slide, and sandbox \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 4)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Caregiver–child ratio}} & In child-care centers, caregiver–child ratio is no greater than 1 to 3 for infants and 1 to 6 for toddlers \tn 
% Row Count 26 (+ 6)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Group size (number of children in one room) is no greater than 6 infants with 2 caregivers and 12 toddlers with 2 caregivers. \tn 
% Row Count 33 (+ 7)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Developmentally Appropriate Infant + Toddler Care (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & In family child care, caregiver is responsible for no more than 6 children; within this group, no more than 2 are infants and toddlers \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 7)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Daily activities}} & Daily schedule includes times for active play, quiet play, naps, snacks, and meals \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 5)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Atmosphere is warm and supportive, and children are never left unsupervised \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 4)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Interactions among adults and children}} & Caregivers respond promptly to infants' and toddlers' distress; hold them and talk, sing, and read to them; and interact with them in a manner that respects the individual child's interests and tolerance for stimulation \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 12)
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Staffing is consistent, so infants and toddlers can form relationships with particular caregivers \tn 
% Row Count 33 (+ 5)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Developmentally Appropriate Infant + Toddler Care (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 12
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Caregiver qualifications}}\{\{nobreak\}\} & Caregivers have some training in child development, first aid, and safety \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 13
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Relationships with parents}} & Parents are welcome anytime \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 2)
% Row 14
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Caregivers talk frequently with parents about children's behavior and development \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 5)
% Row 15
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Licensing and \{\{nl\}\}accreditation}} & Child-care setting is licensed by the state \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 3)
% Row 16
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & In the United States, voluntary accreditation by the National Association for the Education of Young Children or the National Association for Family Child Care is evidence of an especially high-quality program \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 11)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Early Intervention for At-Risk Infants + Toddlers}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Children living in persistent poverty are likely to show gradual declines in intelligence test scores and to achieve poorly when they reach school age}}} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{These problems are largely due to stressful home environments that undermine children's ability to learn and increase the likelihood that they will remain poor as adults} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 4)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Programs}}: a few start in period of infancy and continue through childhood & {\bf{organized child care}}: children receive education, nutritional and health care services, as important to break the cycle is parent education on child rearing and social service supports \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 10)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{Parent education}} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 1)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Home based programs}}: a skilled adult visits home and works with parents teaching them how to stimulate young child's development \tn 
% Row Count 26 (+ 7)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{Early Head Start program}}: begun in 1995 Congress provided limited funding for services directed at infants and toddlers already at risk for developmental problems because of poverty. \tn 
% Row Count 36 (+ 10)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Early Intervention for At-Risk Infants + Toddlers (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Studies indicate that {\bf{poverty-stricken children are likely to show gradual declines in intelligence test scores and to achieve poorly when they reach school age.}} Children participating in interventions designed to break the cycle of poverty for infants and toddlers score higher than untreated controls on mental tests by age 2. The earlier and the longer the intervention, the better the participants' cognitive and academic performance is throughout childhood and adolescence.} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 10)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Language Development}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Improvements in perception and cognition during infancy pave the way for language}}} \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 2)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{They start to comprehend some words and, {\bf{around 12 months of age, say their first word}}} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 2)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{By age 6, children understand the meaning of about 14,000 words and speak in elaborate sentences} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 2)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Theories of Language Development}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Nativist Theory\{\{nl\}\} (Chomsky)\{\{nl\}\}}} & regards language as a unique human accomplishment that is innate or inborn: Children are born with a {\bf{language acquisition device (LAD)}}, containing a set of rules common to all languages, which permits children to understand and speak whichever language they hear \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 14)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{(LAD)}}, an innate system that contains {\bf{a universal grammar}}, or set of rules common to all languages \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 6)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & It enables children, no matter which language they hear, to understand and speak in a rule-oriented fashion as soon as they pick up enough words \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 8)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{infants biologically prepared to learn language}} \tn 
% Row Count 31 (+ 3)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Theories of Language Development (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{First, researchers have had great difficulty specifying {\bf{Chomsky's universal grammar}}. Critics doubt that one set of rules can account for the extraordinary variation in grammatical forms among the world's 5,000 to 8,000 languages. Second, {\bf{children refine and generalize many grammatical forms gradually, engaging in much piecemeal learning and making errors along the way.}} This suggests that more experimentation and learning are involved than Chomsky assumed} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 10)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Interactionist\{\{nl\}\} View}} & emphasize interactions between inner capacities and environmental influences \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 4)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{social-interactionist view}}: emphasizes social skills and language experiences \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 5)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
 & Some interactionists, applying {\bf{information-processing theory}} to language development, assume that children use powerful cognitive capacities to make sense of their complex language environment \tn 
% Row Count 29 (+ 10)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Other interactionists blend this view with {\bf{Chomsky's nativist perspective}}. Still others take a \seqsplit{social-interactionist} view, emphasizing the role of children's social skills and language experiences combine in language development. \tn 
% Row Count 41 (+ 12)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.44 cm} x{4.56 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Getting Ready to Talk}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Around 2 months of age, babies make vowel-like noises called {\bf{cooing}}} \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 2)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Around 6 months, {\bf{babbling}} appears: Infants repeat long strings of consonant–vowel combinations} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 2)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Around 7 months, babbling starts to include many sounds common in spoken languages} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 2)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Around 8 to 10 months, it reflects the sound and intonation patterns of children's language community.} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 3)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{First speech sounds:}} & {\bf{cooing}} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 2)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{babbling}} \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 1)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
Becoming a communicator:\{\{nl\}\} & {\bf{Joint attention:}} (3 to 4 months) the child attends to the same object or event as the caregiver, who often labels it, contributes greatly to early language development \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 8)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{Give-and-take:}} (3 months) Infants and mothers mutually imitate the pitch, loudness, and duration of each other's sounds. Mothers take the lead, imitating about twice as often as 3-month-olds \tn 
% Row Count 29 (+ 9)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Preverbal gestures:}} (end of the first year) to direct adults' attention, influence their behavior, and convey helpful information. toddlers learn that using language leads to desired results \tn 
% Row Count 38 (+ 9)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.44 cm} x{4.56 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Getting Ready to Talk (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{In {\bf{hearing-impaired babies}}, these speech like sounds are greatly delayed. In deaf infants, they stop, but deaf infants exposed to sign language from birth babble with their hands.} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{First Words}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{In {\bf{the middle of the first year, infants begin to understand word meanings}}; for example, they respond to their own name} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{First recognizable spoken words, around 1 year, {\bf{build on the sensorimotor foundations Piaget}} described and on categories children have formed.} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 3)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{In a study tracking {\bf{the first 10 words}} used by several hundred U.S. and Chinese (both Mandarin- and Cantonese-speaking) babies, {\bf{important people}} ("Mama," "Dada"), {\bf{common objects}} ("ball," "bread"), and {\bf{sound effects}} ("woof-woof," "vroom") were mentioned most often. {\bf{Action words}} ("hit," "grab," "hug") and {\bf{social routines}} ("hi," "bye"), though also appearing in all three groups, were {\bf{{\emph{more often produced by Chinese than U.S. babies}}}}, and the Chinese babies also named more important people} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 12)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{When toddlers first learn words, they sometimes apply them too narrowly, an error called {\bf{under extension}}} \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 3)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{As vocabulary expands, a more common error is {\bf{overextension}}—applying a word to a wider collection of objects and events than is appropriate} \tn 
% Row Count 24 (+ 3)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Overextensions}} illustrate another important feature of language development: the distinction between language production (the words and word combinations children use) and language comprehension (the language they understand)} \tn 
% Row Count 29 (+ 5)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{At all ages, {\bf{comprehension develops ahead of production}}. Still, {\bf{the two capacities are related. The speed and accuracy of toddlers' comprehension of spoken language increase dramatically over the second year.}} And toddlers who are faster and more accurate in comprehension at age 3 show more words understood and produced} \tn 
% Row Count 36 (+ 7)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{First Words (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Quick comprehension frees space in working memory}} for picking up new words and for using them to communicate} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{The Two-Word Utterance Phase}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Young toddlers add to their spoken vocabularies at a rate of one to three words per week. Because gains in word production between 18 and 24 months are so impressive (one or two words per day), many researchers concluded that toddlers undergo a {\bf{{\emph{spurt in vocabulary}}}}—a transition from a slower to a faster learning phase. In actuality, most children show a steady increase in rate of word learning that continues through the preschool years} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 9)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Once toddlers produce 200 to 250 words, they start to combine two words: "Mommy shoe," "go car," "more cookie." These two-word utterances are called {\bf{telegraphic speech }}because, like a telegram, they focus on high-content words, omitting smaller, less important ones ("can," "the," "to")} \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 7)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Two-word speech consists largely of simple formulas ("more + X," "eat + X "), with different words inserted in the "X " position} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 3)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Toddlers rarely make gross grammatical errors, such as saying "chair my" instead of "my chair." But rather than following grammatical rules, their word-order regularities are usually copies of adult word pairings, as when the parent says, "How about more sandwich?"} \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Individual Differences}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Although children typically produce their first word around their first birthday, {\bf{the range is large, from 8 to 18 months—variation due to a complex blend of genetic and environmental influences}}} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{The {\bf{most common explanation is girls' faster rate of physical maturation, which is believed to promote earlier development of the left cerebral hemisphere}}} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 4)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Temperament}} matters, too. For example, {\bf{shy toddlers often wait until they understand a great deal before trying to speak}}. Once they do speak, their vocabularies increase rapidly, although they remain slightly behind their agemates} \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 5)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Caregiver–child conversation}}—especially, the richness of adults' vocabularies—also plays a strong role. Commonly used words for objects appear early in toddlers' speech, and the more often their caregivers use a particular noun, the sooner young children produce it. {\bf{Mothers talk more to toddler-age girls than to boys, and parents converse less often with shy than with sociable children}}} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 9)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{children from {\emph{low-SES homes}} usually have smaller vocabularies.}} By 18 to 24 months, they are slower at word comprehension and have acquired 30 percent fewer words} \tn 
% Row Count 26 (+ 4)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Limited parent–child conversation and book reading are major factors.}} On average, {\bf{a middle-SES child is read to for 1,000 hours between 1 and 5 years}}, {\bf{a low-SES child for only 25 hours}}} \tn 
% Row Count 30 (+ 4)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Individual Differences (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Rate of early vocabulary growth is a strong predictor of low-SES children's vocabulary size at kindergarten entry, which forecasts their later literacy skills and academic success}}} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{{\emph{Higher-SES}} toddlers who lag behind their agemates in word learning have more opportunities to catch up in early childhood}}} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 3)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{2.8 cm} x{5.2 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Supporting Early Language Development}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{With infants}} & Respond to coos and babbles \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 2)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
 & Establish joint attention \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 1)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Use infant-directed speech \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 1)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
 & Play social games \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 1)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{With toddlers}} & Engage in joint make-believe \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 2)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
 & Engage in frequent conversations \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 2)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Read often and talk about books \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 2)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\emph{Adults in many cultures}} speak to babies in \{\{nl\}\}{\bf{infant-directed speech (IDS)}}: short sentences with high-pitched, exaggerated expression, clear pronunciation, distinct pauses between speech segments, and repetition of new words in a variety of contexts} \tn 
% Row Count 17 (+ 6)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Deaf parents}} use a similar style of communication when signing to their deaf babies} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 2)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Parent–toddler conversation strongly predicts language development and reading success during the school years}}} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 3)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Live interaction}} with a responsive adult is far better suited to spurring early language development than are media sources} \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 3)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{1.52 cm} x{2.508 cm} x{3.572 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Erikson's Theory of Infant + Toddler Personality}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{(CHAPTER 6)} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{Erikson believed that the psychological conflict of the first year of life is basic trust versus mistrust, and that {\bf{a healthy outcome depends on the quality of the parent–child relationship}}} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 4)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{Erikson {\bf{recognized that many factors affect parental responsiveness}}—{\emph{personal happiness, family conditions (for example, additional young children, social supports, financial well-being), and culturally valued child-rearing practices}}. But when the balance of care is sympathetic and loving, the psychological conflict of the first year—basic trust versus mistrust—is resolved on the positive side} \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 9)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Infant Stage}} & Trust vs Mistrust & Trust is built by infants when they {\bf{expect the world/environment\{\{nl\}\} around them to be good}}. If they feel threatened or uncomfortable,\{\{nl\}\} mistrust builds \tn 
% Row Count 23 (+ 9)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Trust vs Mistrust}} is based on the many factors that influence the parental responsiveness, i.e. the sympathetic and loving balance of care leads to {\bf{Trust}}. The baby experiences the world as good and safe. The {\bf{Mistrustful}} infant cannot count on kindness and compassion from others and then withdraws} \tn 
% Row Count 30 (+ 7)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{1.52 cm} x{2.508 cm} x{3.572 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Erikson's Theory of Infant + Toddler Personality (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{The {\bf{trusting infant}} expects the world to be good and gratifying, so he feels confident about venturing out to explore it} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{The {\bf{mistrustful baby}} cannot count on the kindness and compassion of others, so she protects herself by withdrawing from people and things around her} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 4)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Toddler Stage}} & Autonomy vs. Shame and Doubt & {\bf{Shame and doubt are experienced when toddlers experience over or under controlling \{\{nl\}\}parents/caregivers.}} When parents show understanding, tolerance and patience to a child who wants to assert her independence the child will develop more self- confidence as they explore their environment\{\{nl\}\} \tn 
% Row Count 24 (+ 17)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{During toddlerhood, the conflict of {\bf{autonomy versus shame and doubt}} is resolved favorably when parents and other caregivers provide appropriate guidance and reasonable choices. {\bf{A child who is not criticized when unsuccessful using the potty as during potty training, or is eating incorrectly when using utensils, will learn tolerance and understanding.}} {\bf{Parents who are under or over controlling will give the message that the child is incompetent or unable to control their own impulses and act independently}}} \tn 
% Row Count 35 (+ 11)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{1.52 cm} x{2.508 cm} x{3.572 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Erikson's Theory of Infant + Toddler Personality (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{In Erikson' view, {\bf{toilet training is only one of many influential experiences}}. The familiar refrains of newly walking, talking toddlers—"No!" "Do it myself!"—reveal that they have entered a period of budding selfhood. The conflict of autonomy versus shame and doubt is resolved favorably when parents provide young children with suitable guidance and reasonable choices} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 8)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{A {\bf{self-confident, secure 2-year-old}} has parents who do not criticize or attack him when he fails at new skills—using the toilet, eating with a spoon, or putting away toys} \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 4)
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{8.4cm}}{In contrast, {\bf{when parents are over- or undercontrolling, the outcome is a child who feels forced and shamed and who doubts his ability to control impulses and act competently on his own}}} \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 4)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}---}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Emotional Development}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Researchers have discovered that {\bf{emotions play powerful roles in organizing the attainments that Erikson regarded as so important: {\emph{social relationships}}, {\emph{exploration of the environment}}, and {\emph{discovery of the self}}}}} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.04 cm} x{4.96 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Basic Emotions}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Basic emotions}}—happiness, interest, surprise, fear, anger, sadness, and disgust—{\bf{are universal in humans and other primates and have a long evolutionary history of promoting survival}}} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Only gradually do emotions become clear, well-organized signals. {\bf{The dynamic systems perspective helps us understand how this happens}}: {\emph{Children coordinate separate skills into more effective}}, {\emph{emotionally expressive systems as the central nervous system develops}} and {\emph{the child's goals and experiences change}}} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 7)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Sensitive, contingent caregiver communication}}, in which parents selectively mirror aspects of the baby's diffuse emotional behavior, {\bf{helps infants construct emotional expressions that more closely resemble those of adults}}} \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 5)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{With age, face, voice, and posture start to form organized patterns that vary meaningfully with environmental events} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 3)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Happiness}}\{\{nobreak\}\} & expressed first in blissful smiles and later through exuberant laughter; contributes to many aspects of development \tn 
% Row Count 24 (+ 5)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
 & When infants achieve new skills, they smile and laugh, displaying delight in motor and cognitive mastery. The baby's smile encourages caregivers to smile responsively and to be affectionate and stimulating, and then the baby smiles even more \tn 
% Row Count 35 (+ 11)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.04 cm} x{4.96 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Basic Emotions (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Happiness binds parent and baby into a warm, supportive relationship that fosters the infant's motor, cognitive, and social competencies}} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
 & During the early weeks, newborn babies smile when full, during REM sleep, and in response to gentle stroking of the skin, rocking, and a parent's soft, high-pitched voice. By the end of the first month, infants smile at dynamic, eye-catching sights, such as a bright object jumping suddenly across their field of vision. Between 6 and 10 weeks, the parent's communication evokes a broad grin called the {\bf{social smile.}} These changes parallel the development of infant perceptual capacities—in particular, sensitivity to visual patterns, including the human face \tn 
% Row Count 30 (+ 24)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.04 cm} x{4.96 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Basic Emotions (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & By the {\bf{end of the first year, the smile has become a deliberate social signal}} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Anger and Sadness}} & About 8 to 10\% of women experience {\bf{chronic depression}}—mild to severe feelings of sadness, distress, and withdrawal that continue for months or years. Sometimes, depression emerges or strengthens after childbirth and fails to subside. This is called {\bf{postpartum depression.}} \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 12)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{{\emph{Maternal Depression}}}}: In the weeks after birth, infants of depressed mothers sleep poorly, are less attentive to their surroundings, and have elevated levels of the stress hormone cortisol. The more extreme the depression and the greater the number of stressors in a mother's life (such as marital discord, little or no social support, and poverty), the more the parent–child relationship suffers \tn 
% Row Count 33 (+ 17)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.04 cm} x{4.96 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Basic Emotions (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Depressed mothers view their babies negatively,}} which contributes to their inept caregiving \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 12
\SetRowColor{white}
 & As their {\bf{children get older, these mothers' lack of warmth and involvement is often accompanied by inconsistent discipline}}—sometimes lax, at other times too forceful \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 8)
% Row 13
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & children who experience these maladaptive parenting practices often have serious adjustment problems. Some withdraw into a depressive mood themselves; others become impulsive and aggressive \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 8)
% Row 14
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{{\emph{Paternal Depression}}}}: In a study of a large representative sample of British parents and babies, researchers assessed depressive symptoms of fathers shortly after birth and again the following year. Then they tracked the children's development into the preschool years \tn 
% Row Count 32 (+ 12)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.04 cm} x{4.96 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Basic Emotions (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 15
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Persistent paternal depression}} was, like maternal depression, {\bf{a strong predictor of child behavior problems}}—especially overactivity, defiance, and aggression in boys \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 8)
% Row 16
\SetRowColor{white}
 & Paternal depression is linked to frequent marital and father–child conflict as children \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 4)
% Row 17
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Over time, {\bf{children subjected to parental negativity develop a pessimistic world view}}—one in which they lack self-confidence and perceive their parents and other people as threatening. Children who constantly feel in danger are especially likely to become overly aroused in stressful situations, easily losing control in the face of cognitive and social challenges \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 16)
% Row 18
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Fear}} & Like anger, fear rises from{\bf{ the second half of the first year into the second year}} \tn 
% Row Count 32 (+ 4)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.04 cm} x{4.96 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Basic Emotions (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 19
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Older infants hesitate before playing with a new toy, and newly crawling infants soon back away from heights \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
% Row 20
\SetRowColor{white}
 & But the most frequent expression of fear is to unfamiliar adults, a response called {\bf{stranger anxiety}}. Many infants and toddlers are quite wary of strangers, although the reaction varies with temperament (some babies are generally more fearful), past experiences with strangers, and the current situation. When an unfamiliar adult picks up the infant, stranger anxiety is likely. But if the adult sits still while the baby moves around and a parent is nearby, infants often show positive and curious behavior \tn 
% Row Count 27 (+ 22)
% Row 21
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Cross-cultural}} research reveals that infant-rearing practices can modify stranger anxiety. Among the Efe hunters and gatherers of the Republic of Congo, where the maternal death rate is high, infant survival is safeguarded by a collective caregiving system in which, starting at birth, Efe babies are passed from one adult to another. Consequently, Efe infants show little stranger anxiety \tn 
% Row Count 44 (+ 17)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.92 cm} x{4.08 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Self-Conscious Emotions}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Self-conscious emotions}}are a second, higher order of feelings} \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 2)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Parental guidance is needed to help the young child know when these feelings are appropriate.}} This varies greatly among different cultures. As in collectivist societies such as China and Japan, calling attention to one's individual success is considered embarrassing. {\bf{Failing to show concern for others (a parent, friend, teacher) causes intense shame in these cultures}}} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 8)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Toddlers need to have an awareness of themselves as {\emph{unique}} and {\emph{separate}}}}} \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 2)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
Appear between ages 1 1/2 and 3 years: & {\bf{shame}} \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 2)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{guilt}} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 1)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{embarrassment}} \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 1)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{pride}} \tn 
% Row Count 17 (+ 1)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{envy}} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 1)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
Require: & awareness of self as separate and unique \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 2)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{white}
 & adult instruction in when to feel emotions \tn 
% Row Count 23 (+ 3)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.52 cm} x{4.48 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Thomas and Chess Structure of Temperament}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{infants vary widely in temperament, including both {\bf{reactivity}} (quickness and intensity of emotional arousal, attention, and motor activity) and {\bf{self-regulation}} (strategies for modifying reactivity). A growing body of research on temperament examines its stability, biological roots, and interaction with child-rearing experiences} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 7)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{In the mid 1950's {\bf{Thomas and Chess}} investigated the development of temperament in a longitudinal study of children from early infancy into adulthood. {\bf{Results indicated that temperament can have a lasting effect on development of psychological problems or conversely, protect a child from negative effects of a highly stressful home environment. And parenting practices can modify children's temperament significantly}}} \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 9)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{temperament can increase a child's chances of experiencing psychological problems or, alternatively, protect a child from the negative effects of a highly stressful home life}}} \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 4)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Easy}} & 40\% of sample; The "easy" temperament child quickly adapts to routines and is generally cheerful \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 5)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Difficult}} & 10\% of sample; The "difficult" child is irregular in daily routines and slow to accept new experiences and tends to react negatively and intensely \tn 
% Row Count 32 (+ 7)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.52 cm} x{4.48 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Thomas and Chess Structure of Temperament (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{"Slow-to-warm-up"}}\{\{nobreak\}\} & 15\% of sample; The "slow-to-warm" child is inactive, shows mild, low key reactions to environmental stimuli, is negative in mood and adjusts slowly to new experiences \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 8)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Unclassified}} & 35\% of sample; The unclassified children show blends of temperamental characteristics \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 4)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Individuals differ not just in their reactivity on each dimension but also in the self-regulatory dimension of temperament}}, effortful control—the capacity to voluntarily suppress a dominant response in order to plan and execute a more adaptive response} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 6)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Temperament is often assessed through interviews or questionnaires given to parents}}. Behavior ratings by pediatricians, teachers, and others familiar with the child and laboratory observations by researchers have also been used. {\bf{Parental reports are convenient and take advantage of parents' depth of knowledge about their child across many situations}}} \tn 
% Row Count 26 (+ 8)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Observations by researchers avoid the subjectivity of parental reports but can lead to other inaccuracies. In homes, observers find it hard to capture rare but important events, such as infants' response to frustration. And in the unfamiliar lab setting, fearful children may become too upset to complete the session} \tn 
% Row Count 33 (+ 7)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Rothbart's Model of Temperament}}  \tn
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{p{8.4cm}}{\vspace{1px}\centerline{\includegraphics[width=5.1cm]{/web/www.cheatography.com/public/uploads/hallie19_1615234104_dimensions.png}}} \tn 
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{The capacity for effortful control in early childhood predicts favorable development and adjustment in diverse cultures, with some studies showing long-term effects into adolescence and adulthood. Positive outcomes include persistence, task mastery, academic achievement, cooperation, moral maturity (such as concern about wrongdoing and willingness to apologize), and social behaviors of cooperation, sharing, and helpfulness}  \tn 
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Bowlby's Ethological Theory of Attachment}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Ethological Theory of Attachment}} & recognizes the infant's emotional tie to the caregiver as an evolved response that promotes survival, is the most widely accepted view \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 7)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{According to Bowlby, attachment begins as a set of inborn signals that the baby uses to summon the parent, and then goes through four phases as it develops into a true affectionate bond}}} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 4)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{According to Bowlby, out of their experiences during these four phases, children construct an enduring affectionate tie to the caregiver that they can use as a secure base in the parents' absence} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 4)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Pre-attachment phase}}\{\{nobreak\}\} & {\emph{(birth to 6 weeks)}}: Built-in signals (grasping, smiling, crying, and gazing into the adult's eyes) help bring newborn babies into close contact with other humans, who comfort them \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 10)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Attachment-in-the-making phase}} & {\emph{(6 weeks to 6–8 months)}}: Babies respond differently to a familiar caregiver than to a stranger and begin to develop a sense of trust \tn 
% Row Count 32 (+ 7)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Bowlby's Ethological Theory of Attachment (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Clear-cut attachment phase}} & {\emph{(6–8 months to 18 months–2 years)}}: Babies display {\bf{separation anxiety}}, becoming upset when the trusted caregiver leaves \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 7)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{in many cultures, separation anxiety increases between 6 and 15 months}}. Besides protesting the parent's departure, older infants and toddlers approach, follow, and climb on her in preference to others. And they use the familiar caregiver as a secure base from which to explore \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 14)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Formation of a reciprocal relationship\{\{nl\}\} with caregiver}} & {\emph{(18 months to 2 years and on)}}: Rapid growth in representation and language enables toddlers to understand some of the factors that influence the parent's coming and going and to predict her return. As a result, separation protest declines \tn 
% Row Count 33 (+ 12)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Bowlby's Ethological Theory of Attachment (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{With age, children continually revise and expand their internal working model as their cognitive, emotional, and social capacities increase and as they interact with parents and form other close bonds with adults, siblings, and friends} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 5)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Measuring the Security of Attachment}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Secure attachment}} & These infants use the parent as a secure base. When separated, they may or may not cry, but if they do, it is because the parent is absent and they prefer her to the stranger. When the parent returns, they convey clear pleasure—some expressing joy from a distance, others asking to be held until settling down to return to play—and crying is reduced immediately \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 19)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
 & About 60\% of North American infants in middle-SES families show this pattern \tn 
% Row Count 23 (+ 4)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Insecure–\{\{nl\}\}avoidant attachment}} & These infants seem unresponsive to the parent when she is present. When she leaves, they usually are not distressed, and they react to the stranger in much the same way as to the parent. During reunion, they avoid or are slow to greet the parent, and when picked up, they often fail to cling \tn 
% Row Count 38 (+ 15)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Measuring the Security of Attachment (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & About 15\% of North American infants in middle-SES families show this pattern \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Insecure–\{\{nl\}\}resistant attachment}} & Before separation, these infants seek closeness to the parent and often fail to explore. When the parent leaves, they are usually distressed, and on her return they combine clinginess with angry, resistive behavior (struggling when held, hitting and pushing). Many continue to cry after being picked up and cannot be comforted easily \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 17)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & About 10\% of North American infants in middle-SES families show this pattern \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 4)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Disorganized\{\{nl\}\}/disoriented attachment}} & This pattern reflects the greatest insecurity. At reunion, these infants show confused, contradictory behaviors—for example, looking away while the parent is holding them or approaching the parent with flat, depressed emotion \tn 
% Row Count 37 (+ 12)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Measuring the Security of Attachment (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & About 15\% of North American infants in middle-SES families show this pattern \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{An alternative method,{\bf{ the Attachment Q-Sort}}, suitable for children between 1 and 5 years, depends on home observation} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 3)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Either the parent or a highly trained observer sorts 90 behaviors—such as "Child greets mother with a big smile when she enters the room," "If mother moves very far, child follows along," and "Child uses mother's facial expressions as a good source of information when something looks risky or threatening"—into nine categories ranging from "highly descriptive" to "not at all descriptive" of the child. Then a score, ranging from high to low in security, is computed} \tn 
% Row Count 17 (+ 10)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{The {\bf{Q-Sort}} responses of expert observers correspond well with babies' secure-base behavior in the Strange Situation, but parents' Q-Sorts do not. Parents of insecure children, especially, may have difficulty accurately reporting their child's attachment behaviors} \tn 
% Row Count 23 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Measuring the Security of Attachment}}  \tn
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{p{8.4cm}}{\vspace{1px}\centerline{\includegraphics[width=5.1cm]{/web/www.cheatography.com/public/uploads/hallie19_1615235228_o.png}}} \tn 
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Observing infants responses to these episodes, researchers identify a secure attachment pattern + 3 patterns of insecurity. Secure attachment- infants use parent as secure base. When separated, they may cry, because parent is absent and they prefer her to a stranger. When parent returns, they convey clear pleasure—expressing joy from distance, or asking to be held until settling down to return to play—and crying is reduced immediately. It takes baby through eight short episodes}  \tn 
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.04 cm} x{4.96 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Stability of Attachment}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Stability of attachment}} is generally found in families whose secure economic status with well adjusted mothers and positive family and friendship ties} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Infants and toddlers of low SES families that are faced with financial and job stresses and little social support are more likely to have less stable attachments} \tn 
% Row Count 8 (+ 4)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{However this trend can be overcome with the involvement and support of other family members and professional caregiver} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 3)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Cross cultural evidence}} indicates that the attachment patterns may have to be interpreted differently in other cultures. But despite the cultural variations the secure pattern is the most common attachment quality in all societies that have been studied} \tn 
% Row Count 17 (+ 6)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Multiple Attachments:}} & {\bf{Fathers:}} Fathers' sensitive caregiving predicts attachment security, though somewhat less strongly than mothers. But mothers and fathers in many cultures, including Australia, Canada, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, and the United States, tend to interact differently with their babies. Mothers devote more time to physical care and expressing affection, fathers to playful interaction \tn 
% Row Count 34 (+ 17)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.04 cm} x{4.96 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Stability of Attachment (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Siblings:}} Despite declines in family size, nearly 80\% of U.S. children grow up with at least one sibling. The arrival of a new baby is a difficult experience for most preschoolers, who often become demanding, clingy, and less affectionate with their parents for a time. Attachment security also declines, especially for children over age 2 (old enough to feel threatened and displaced) and for those with mothers under stress. Older children also show affection and concern when the infant cries. By the end of the first year, babies are comforted by the presence of a preschool-age brother or sister during short parental absences. Throughout childhood, children continue to treat older siblings as attachment figures, turning to them for comfort in stressful situations when parents are unavailable \tn 
% Row Count 34 (+ 34)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.04 cm} x{4.96 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Stability of Attachment (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Grandparents}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{Professional caregivers}} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 2)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{The exception is {\bf{disorganized/disoriented attachment}}, an insecure pattern that is either highly stable or consistently predicts later insecurity of another type} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 4)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Furthermore, {\bf{adults with histories of attachment disorganization are at increased risk of having children who display disorganized/disoriented attachment}}} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 4)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Stability of Attachment (Cultural Variations)}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Cross-cultural evidence indicates that attachment patterns may have to be interpreted differently in certain cultures}}} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{German infants}} show considerably {\bf{more avoidant attachment than American babies do.}} But {\bf{German parents value independence and encourage their infants to be nonclingy}}} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 4)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{In contrast, a study of infants of {\bf{the Dogon people of Mali, Africa, revealed that none showed avoidant attachment to their mothers}}} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 3)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Even when grandmothers are primary caregivers (as they are with firstborn sons), Dogon mothers remain available to their babies, holding them close and nursing them promptly in response to hunger and distress} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 5)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Japanese infants}}, as well, rarely show avoidant attachment. Rather, many are resistantly attached, but this reaction may not represent true insecurity. Japanese mothers rarely leave their babies in others' care, so the Strange Situation probably induces greater stress in them than in babies who frequently experience maternal separations} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 7)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Also, Japanese parents view the attention seeking that is part of resistant attachment as a normal indicator of infants' efforts to satisfy dependency needs} \tn 
% Row Count 26 (+ 4)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{8.4cm}}{Despite these and other cultural variations, the secure pattern is still the most common attachment quality in all societies studied} \tn 
% Row Count 29 (+ 3)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Factors That Affect Attachment Security}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{(1) Early availability of consistent caregiver}} & show greatly elevated rates of attachment. They are also at high risk for emotional and social difficulties. Many are overly friendly to unfamiliar adults; others are sad, anxious, and withdrawn \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 10)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
 & These symptoms are associated with wide-ranging mental health problems in middle childhood and adolescence, including cognitive impairments, inattention and overactivity, depression, and either social avoidance or aggressive behavior \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 12)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{(2) Quality of \{\{nl\}\}caregiving:}} & {\bf{Sensitive caregiving:}} responding promptly, consistently, and appropriately to infants and holding them tenderly and carefully \tn 
% Row Count 29 (+ 7)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
 & is moderately related to attachment security across cultures and SES groups \tn 
% Row Count 33 (+ 4)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Factors That Affect Attachment Security (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Interactional synchrony in Western cultures:}} the caregiver responds to infant signals in a well- timed, rhythmic, appropriate fashion, and both partners match emotional states, especially the positive ones \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 11)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
 & separates the experiences of secure from insecure babies \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 3)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{(3) Infant characteristics}} & Because attachment is the result of a relationship between two partners, infant characteristics should affect how easily it is established. Babies whose temperament is emotionally reactive are more likely to develop later insecure attachments \tn 
% Row Count 27 (+ 13)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
 & However, parental mental health and caregiving are involved. Babies with the short 5-HTTLPR gene, which is associated with emotional reactivity, are more likely than infants with a low-risk genotype to exhibit \seqsplit{disorganized/disoriented} attachment, but only when caregiving is insensitive \tn 
% Row Count 42 (+ 15)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Factors That Affect Attachment Security (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & In other research, mothers' experience of trauma was associated with attachment disorganization, but only in infants with a chromosome-11 gene having a certain repetition of DNA base pairs, called DRD4 7-repeat, which is linked to impulsive, overactive behavior \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 14)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{white}
 & These babies, who face self-regulation challenges, were more susceptible to the negative impact of maternal adjustment problems \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 7)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Interventions that teach parents to interact sensitively with \seqsplit{difficult-to-care-for} babies enhance both sensitive caregiving and attachment security \tn 
% Row Count 29 (+ 8)
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{white}
 & One program that focused on both maternal sensitivity and effective discipline was particularly successful in reducing irritable distress and disruptive behavior in toddlers with the DRD4 7-repeat \tn 
% Row Count 39 (+ 10)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Factors That Affect Attachment Security (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 12
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & These findings suggest that the DRD4 7-repeat—like the short 5-HTTLPR gene—makes children more susceptible to the effects of both negative and positive parenting \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 9)
% Row 13
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{(4) Family circumstances}} & Job loss, a failing marriage, financial difficulties, or parental psychological problems (such as anxiety or depression) can undermine attachment indirectly by interfering with parental sensitivity. These stressors can also affect babies' sense of security directly, by altering the emotional climate of the family (for example, exposing them to angry adult interactions) or by disrupting familiar daily routines \tn 
% Row Count 30 (+ 21)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Factors That Affect Attachment Security (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 14
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & By reducing parental stress and improving parent–child communication, social support fosters attachment security \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
% Row 15
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{(5) Parents' internal working models}} & Parents bring to the family context their own history of attachment experiences, from which they construct internal working models that they apply to the bonds they establish with their children \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 10)
% Row 16
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & To assess parents' internal working models, researchers ask them to evaluate childhood memories of attachment experiences. Parents who discuss their childhoods with objectivity and balance, regardless of whether their experiences were positive or negative, tend to behave sensitively and have securely attached children. In contrast, parents who dismiss the importance of early relationships or describe them in angry, confused ways usually have insecurely attached children and are less warm, sensitive, and encouraging of learning and mastery \tn 
% Row Count 44 (+ 28)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Factors That Affect Attachment Security (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 17
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & Longitudinal research reveals that negative life events can weaken the link between an individual's own attachment security in infancy and a secure internal working model in adulthood. And insecurely attached babies who become adults with insecure internal working models often have lives that, based on self-reports in adulthood, are filled with family crises \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 18)
% Row 18
\SetRowColor{white}
 & The way we view our childhoods—our ability to come to terms with negative events, to integrate new information into our working models, and to look back on our own parents in an understanding, forgiving way—is far more influential in how we rear our children than the actual history of care we received \tn 
% Row Count 34 (+ 16)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Factors That Affect Attachment Security (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 19
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 0 (+ 0)
% Row 20
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Avoidant infants tend to receive over-stimulating, intrusive care, while resistant infants often experience inconsistent care. Because attachment is the result of a relationship that builds between two partners, infant characteristics should affect how easily it is established} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
% Row 21
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Babies whose temperament is emotionally reactive and difficult are more likely to develop later insecure attachments, but insecurity is more likely when these babies also have highly anxious mothers, leading to a "disharmonious relationship"} \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 5)
% Row 22
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Stressful life changes in families may undermine attachment by interfering with parental sensitivity and can also affect babies' sense of security directly, by altering the emotional climate of the family or by disrupting familiar daily routines. Think of a new baby arriving in a toddler's family} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 7)
% Row 23
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Parents bring to the family context their own history of attachment experiences, although early rearing experiences do not destine individuals to become either sensitive or insensitive parents} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 4)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{What factors affect Attachment security?}}  \newline Overall, the evidence indicates that fully normal emotional development depends on establishing a close tie with a caregiver early in life}  \tn 
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.12 cm} x{4.88 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Self-Development}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Self-\{\{nl\}\}awareness}} & from birth; Aided by capacity for intermodal perception \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
 & they feel their own touch, feel and watch their limbs move, and feel and hear themselves cry, babies experience intermodal matches that differentiate their own body from surrounding bodies and objects \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 9)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Self-\{\{nl\}\}recognition}} & Emerges end of second year \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 2)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
 & Promoted by acting on environment and noting effects (identification of the self as a physically unique being) \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 5)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & They are recognizing that their own actions cause objects and people react in a predictable way. Example: smiling at a caregiver who smiles and vocalizes back helps show the child the relationship between self and social world. Rolling a ball to caregiver who rolls it back is another example \tn 
% Row Count 32 (+ 13)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{3.12 cm} x{4.88 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Self-Development (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Empathy}}\{\{nl\}\} & Ability to "feel with" another person \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 2)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{white}
 & Aided by self-awareness and advancing cognitive, language, and social skill \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 4)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Older toddlers who have experienced sensitive caregiving draw on their advancing cognitive, language, and social skills to express first signs of {\bf{empathy}}} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 4)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Toddlers show empathy when others are distressed and may offer a hug or favorite toy to person} \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 2)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 0)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Between 18 and 30 months children classify themselves on basis of age, sex (boy or girl), on their physical characteristics, on their "goodness" or "badness" and also on their competencies} \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 4)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Cultural variations exist in early self-development. In one investigation, urban middle-SES German and East Indian toddlers attained mirror self-recognition earlier than toddlers of non-Western farming communities, such as the Nso people of rural Cameroon and rural families of East India}  \tn 
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Self-Control}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Self-awareness also contributes to effortful control, evident in toddlers' strengthening capacity to inhibit impulses, manage negative emotion, and behave in socially acceptable ways}}} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{As children learn to become self controlled they must think of themselves as separate, unique beings who can direct their own actions.}} And they must have memory capacity to recall caregivers' directive: "don't touch the light socket or don't crawl up the steps"} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 6)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Effortful control is the capacity to:}} & inhibit impulses \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 3)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
 & manage negative emotions \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 2)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & behave in socially acceptable ways \tn 
% Row Count 17 (+ 2)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 17 (+ 0)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Depends on:}} & awareness of self as separate, autonomous being \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 3)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
 & confidence in directing own actions \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 2)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & memory for caregiver's directives \tn 
% Row Count 24 (+ 2)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{To behave in a self-controlled fashion, children must think of themselves as separate, autonomous beings who can direct their own actions.}} And they must have the representational and memory capacities to recall a caregiver's directive and apply it to their own behavior} \tn 
% Row Count 30 (+ 6)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Self-Control (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{As self-control improves, parents gradually expand the rules they expect toddlers to follow, from safety and respect for property and people to family routines, manners, and simple chores}}} \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Helping Toddlers Develop Compliance + Self-Control}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Some examples of parental guidance are:}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{(1) Respond with sensitivity and support} \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 1)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
(2) Give advance notice of change in activities & parent to stop pleasurable activity rather than waiting to last moment. "we are going to the playground soon and you need to pick up your toys so we can leave." \tn 
% Row Count 11 (+ 9)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{(3) Offer many prompts and reminders} \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 1)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{(4) Reinforce self-controlled behavior} \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 1)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{(5) Encourage sustained attention} \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 1)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{(6) Support language development} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 1)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{(7) Increase rules gradually} \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 1)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Toddlers become capable of compliance between 12 and 18 months, now aware of caregivers wishes and expectations} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 3)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Toddlers with parents' sensitivity and support may resist at times but also are more compliant} \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 2)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Continuous adult oversight and patient assistance needed as memory and compliance is limited} \tn 
% Row Count 23 (+ 2)
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Gradually increase rules for behavior in a manner consistent with toddler's developing capacities} \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 2)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{2.48 cm} x{5.52 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Toddler Development}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Play}} & what toddlers do and it is essential to their health and development \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
 & During play toddlers exercise, learn to manage their body, improve coordination and manual dexterity, increase awareness of their surroundings and objects, develop spatial and sensory perception, learn attention and language, release emotional tension and channel unacceptable urges such as aggression, into acceptable activities. \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 13)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & oddler learns through play right from wrong and learns to have fun and master skills \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 4)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Exercise}}\{\{nl\}\} & Exercise helps children learn physical, mental and social skills. Parents who play actively with their children help to develop these skills. Sedentary activities such as reading should be balanced with active play \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 8)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Rest}} & Rest and sleep are as important as physical activity and play. In sleep and rest Toddlers need an average of 10-12 hours of sleep nightly plus nap during day of 1-2 hours \tn 
% Row Count 35 (+ 7)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{2.48 cm} x{5.52 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Toddler Development (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Sleep}} & Sleep is essential to physical growth and healing if the child is ill. During sleep the growth hormone is produced in greater quantities \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Toddler Developmental Tasks}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Develop Physical skills appropriate to motor stage}} & Physical skills are developed by encouraging exercise and fun through play activities and with parental encouragement \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Master basics of toilet training}} & {\bf{Independence and autonomy}}, not cleanliness, {\bf{are the critical issues in teaching the child to use the toilet.}} Arrange for the child to use the toilet easily and parent supports rather than acts as trainer, shows interest in child, not just the act. The toddler is interested in the product she or he excretes. {\bf{Neuro muscular maturity increases from 1 to 3 years}}. {\bf{Bowel control occurs before bladder control and is a less complex task}}. Shows readiness for bowel training when defecates regularly, shows signs of awareness of defecation, (pulls on diaper, or training pants).If learning to speak this helps if parent can choose words to use for defecation so child will learn these and be able to communicate. {\bf{Mental and emotional readiness are important}} \tn 
% Row Count 45 (+ 39)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Toddler Developmental Tasks (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & For bladder training child is ready when child knows when he is wet., wakes up dry after nap or nighttime, or goes more than 2 hours during the day being dry. {\bf{Child needs to understand both boys and girls can sit down on toilet to urinate. Daddy can help boys learn how to stand up to urinate}} \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 15)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Master basics of good eating and sleep habits}} & Eating habits are learned from example by parent or caregiver. Use finger foods and let child choose and offer small portions. Do not use food as reward or punishment. Children under the age of 2 should not drink skim milk or eat only low fat foods as fat is needed for neurological development. Offer snacks of fruit, yogurt, crackers and cheese and certainly offer 3 regular meals a day Avoid the frequent high sugar snacks. Toddlers do not have high caloric need and their caloric need does increase slowly through the toddler period. \tn 
% Row Count 42 (+ 27)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Toddler Developmental Tasks (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Become more aware of being family member, early social skills}}} \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 2)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{Language and \{\{nl\}\}communication skills}} & The child understands words before they understand the meanings At 18 months a vocabulary of 50 words and at 2 years between 50 and 400 words. It all depends on the caregiver's involvement in teaching and reading \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 11)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Self-\{\{nl\}\}control and beginning \{\{nl\}\}independence in behavior}} & Learning self control and having daily routines are all part of the developmental tasks of the toddler \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 6)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Begin to have healthy daily routines}}} \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 1)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Health Promotion and Health Protection}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{(1) Immunizations:}}\{\{nl\}\} & {\bf{HepB:}} For hepatitis B \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 2)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{DTaP:}} Diptheria, Tetanus, Pertussis (whooping cough) \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 3)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{RV:}} Rotovirus \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 1)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{Hib:}} Protects against influenza type b \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 3)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{PCV:}} pneumococcal protects against pneumococcal pneumonia \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 4)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{IPV:}} Polio vaccine \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 2)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{MMR:}} Measles, mumps, Rubella at age 1 year \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 3)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{HepA:}} for Hepatitis A \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 2)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Yearly influenza vaccine}} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 2)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{(2) Dental Health:}} & teaching the child good oral hygiene habits can lead to a lifelong healthy smile. But did you know that just because babies don't have visible teeth doesn't mean they can't get cavities \tn 
% Row Count 32 (+ 10)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Health Promotion and Health Protection (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & The baby's 20 primary teeth are already present in the jaws at birth. And those baby teeth that begin coming through the gum at about 6 months help set the stage for future smiles by keeping space in the jaw for the adult teeth \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 12)
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{white}
 & The {\emph{American Dental Association}} recommends that parents take children to the dentist no later than their first birthday and then at intervals recommended by the dentist \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 9)
% Row 12
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{{\bf{Immunizations}} needed for the infant through the toddler age group. And you need to know these immunizations for the first two years. Parents need to be encouraged to have their child vaccinated as these are required before they can attend school or preschool} \tn 
% Row Count 27 (+ 6)
% Row 13
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{The {\bf{HCP}} needs to call attention to these vaccinations and answer questions related to this. There has been a redevelopment of measles because too many parents have refused to have infants vaccinated because of fear of reaction to the vaccine} \tn 
% Row Count 32 (+ 5)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Health Promotion and Health Protection (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 14
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{(3) Safety Promotion and Injury Control}} & Major concerns about infant/toddler safety are accidental injury due to motor vehicle accidents (MVA), burns, suffocation, drowning, poisoning, and falls. MVA are the major cause of death and related to improper use of car restraints or inappropriate size for infant/toddler \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 14)
% Row 15
\SetRowColor{white}
 & if toddler plays in area of traffic. Use of child proof gates, locks on cabinets where hazardous substances are kept \tn 
% Row Count 20 (+ 6)
% Row 16
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Accidental injury:}} MVA, burns, drowning, suffocation (SIDS), poisoning, falls \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 5)
% Row 17
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)}} is a risk of suffocating for the very young infant if the child is placed on soft pillows or a couch for a nap \tn 
% Row Count 33 (+ 8)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{8.4cm}{x{4 cm} x{4 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Health Promotion and Health Protection (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 18
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & There is also thought to be some risk for the infant if co-sleeping with adults \tn 
% Row Count 4 (+ 4)
% Row 19
\SetRowColor{white}
{\bf{(4) Common Health Problems}} & {\bf{Respiratory infections}} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 2)
% Row 20
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Asthma}} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 1)
% Row 21
\SetRowColor{white}
 & {\bf{Otitis Media (ear infection)}} \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 2)
% Row 22
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
 & {\bf{Food allergies}} \tn 
% Row Count 10 (+ 1)
% Row 23
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{The{\bf{ most common health problems}} at this age are {\bf{respiratory problems and home accidents}}} \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 2)
% Row 24
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{Teaching the young child to cover their cough or sneeze with tissue or their upper arm/sleeve. Do not use their hands. Washing hands frequently especially after cough, before eating, after playing with other's toys (as at day care). And the adult needs to set the example for this behavior. However children in day care centers will be exposed to more infectious diseases, mostly viral, but some bacterial} \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 9)
% Row 25
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{8.4cm}}{If child is ill, they may not be able to communicate pain but show restlessness and withdrawal. Take their temperature using newer types equipment such as heat sensors available at drug store} \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 4)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}


% That's all folks
\end{multicols*}

\end{document}