\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}

% Packages
\usepackage{fancyhdr}           % For header and footer
\usepackage{multicol}           % Allows multicols in tables
\usepackage{tabularx}           % Intelligent column widths
\usepackage{tabulary}           % Used in header and footer
\usepackage{hhline}             % Border under tables
\usepackage{graphicx}           % For images
\usepackage{xcolor}             % For hex colours
%\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}    % For unicode character support
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}        % Without this we get weird character replacements
\usepackage{colortbl}           % For coloured tables
\usepackage{setspace}           % For line height
\usepackage{lastpage}           % Needed for total page number
\usepackage{seqsplit}           % Splits long words.
%\usepackage{opensans}          % Can't make this work so far. Shame. Would be lovely.
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}     % For underlining links
% Most of the following are not required for the majority
% of cheat sheets but are needed for some symbol support.
\usepackage{amsmath}            % Symbols
\usepackage{MnSymbol}           % Symbols
\usepackage{wasysym}            % Symbols
%\usepackage[english,german,french,spanish,italian]{babel}              % Languages

% Document Info
\author{generallynonsensical}
\pdfinfo{
  /Title (work.pdf)
  /Creator (Cheatography)
  /Author (generallynonsensical)
  /Subject (Work Cheat Sheet)
}

% Lengths and widths
\addtolength{\textwidth}{6cm}
\addtolength{\textheight}{-1cm}
\addtolength{\hoffset}{-3cm}
\addtolength{\voffset}{-2cm}
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.2cm} % Space between columns
\setlength{\headsep}{-12pt} % Reduce space between header and content
\setlength{\headheight}{85pt} % If less, LaTeX automatically increases it
\renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0pt} % Remove footer line
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt} % Remove header line
\renewcommand{\seqinsert}{\ifmmode\allowbreak\else\-\fi} % Hyphens in seqsplit
% This two commands together give roughly
% the right line height in the tables
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
\onehalfspacing

% Commands
\newcommand{\SetRowColor}[1]{\noalign{\gdef\RowColorName{#1}}\rowcolor{\RowColorName}} % Shortcut for row colour
\newcommand{\mymulticolumn}[3]{\multicolumn{#1}{>{\columncolor{\RowColorName}}#2}{#3}} % For coloured multi-cols
\newcolumntype{x}[1]{>{\raggedright}p{#1}} % New column types for ragged-right paragraph columns
\newcommand{\tn}{\tabularnewline} % Required as custom column type in use

% Font and Colours
\definecolor{HeadBackground}{HTML}{333333}
\definecolor{FootBackground}{HTML}{666666}
\definecolor{TextColor}{HTML}{333333}
\definecolor{DarkBackground}{HTML}{A3A3A3}
\definecolor{LightBackground}{HTML}{F3F3F3}
\renewcommand{\familydefault}{\sfdefault}
\color{TextColor}

% Header and Footer
\pagestyle{fancy}
\fancyhead{} % Set header to blank
\fancyfoot{} % Set footer to blank
\fancyhead[L]{
\noindent
\begin{multicols}{3}
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{C}
    \SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
    \vspace{-7pt}
    {\parbox{\dimexpr\textwidth-2\fboxsep\relax}{\noindent
        \hspace*{-6pt}\includegraphics[width=5.8cm]{/web/www.cheatography.com/public/images/cheatography_logo.pdf}}
    }
\end{tabulary}
\columnbreak
\begin{tabulary}{11cm}{L}
    \vspace{-2pt}\large{\bf{\textcolor{DarkBackground}{\textrm{Work Cheat Sheet}}}} \\
    \normalsize{by \textcolor{DarkBackground}{generallynonsensical} via \textcolor{DarkBackground}{\uline{cheatography.com/209556/cs/45069/}}}
\end{tabulary}
\end{multicols}}

\fancyfoot[L]{ \footnotesize
\noindent
\begin{multicols}{3}
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{LL}
  \SetRowColor{FootBackground}
  \mymulticolumn{2}{p{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cheatographer}}  \\
  \vspace{-2pt}generallynonsensical \\
  \uline{cheatography.com/generallynonsensical} \\
  \end{tabulary}
\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{L}
  \SetRowColor{FootBackground}
  \mymulticolumn{1}{p{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cheat Sheet}}  \\
   \vspace{-2pt}Not Yet Published.\\
   Updated 21st November, 2024.\\
   Page {\thepage} of \pageref{LastPage}.
\end{tabulary}
\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{L}
  \SetRowColor{FootBackground}
  \mymulticolumn{1}{p{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Sponsor}}  \\
  \SetRowColor{white}
  \vspace{-5pt}
  %\includegraphics[width=48px,height=48px]{dave.jpeg}
  Measure your website readability!\\
  www.readability-score.com
\end{tabulary}
\end{multicols}}




\begin{document}
\raggedright
\raggedcolumns

% Set font size to small. Switch to any value
% from this page to resize cheat sheet text:
% www.emerson.emory.edu/services/latex/latex_169.html
\footnotesize % Small font.


\begin{tabularx}{17.67cm}{x{1.647 cm} x{4.6116 cm} x{5.1057 cm} x{5.1057 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{4}{x{17.67cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Documentation}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\seqsplit{Question} & \seqsplit{Quantitative} & \seqsplit{Intrepretation} Guide & Reviewer Notes \tn 
% Row Count 2 (+ 2)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
1.1 & Any \seqsplit{confirmation} of guideline criteria is \seqsplit{acceptable.}    Can state all four in notes or state all 4 criteria met (and provide examples) & Question 1.1 - The intent of question 1.1 is to verify the company has a written overall corporate commitment \seqsplit{policy/statement/} health and safety policy. This question is asking for \seqsplit{verification} of general health and safety \seqsplit{responsibilities}, not a detailed specific listing of \seqsplit{responsibilities} at each level such as job \seqsplit{descriptions}.  The \seqsplit{three-bullet} points stated in the \seqsplit{instructions} are required content for the policy, ensure the declaration of commitment to the health and safety that addresses physical, \seqsplit{psychological}, and social well- being of employees.  Auditors need to be clear they are referring to the overarching corporate \seqsplit{commitment/health} and safety policy not the entire health and safety manual. \seqsplit{Interviewees} often confuse the two.   The auditor also needs to quantify their response in the notes such s "4/4" criteria are met. It is acceptable in situations for employers such as School Boards or very large complex \seqsplit{organizations}, to have the policy approved by the Board or signed by the Chairman of the Board. All 4 criteria must be included. & {\emph{*}} \seqsplit{Example/details} needed \tn 
% Row Count 91 (+ 89)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{17.67cm}{x{1.647 cm} x{4.6116 cm} x{5.1057 cm} x{5.1057 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{4}{x{17.67cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Documentation (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
1.5 & Any \seqsplit{confirmation} of guidelines that includes  - the number of levels where H\&S  \seqsplit{responsibilities} are identified (Senior Managers, Managers, \seqsplit{Supervisors} or Workers)** unless a level (s) does not apply to the employer being audited. & Question 1.5 –This question is about specifics, not the general reference to \seqsplit{responsibilities}, as asked for in 1.1.  The company must have a list of health and safety \seqsplit{responsibilities} for each level (Senior Manager, Manager, Supervisor, Worker) within their HSMS.  Do not combine levels together. Health and safety \seqsplit{responsibilities} may be written in their job profiles, and may be included as part of a written directive in each element of the health and safety management system. Read the \seqsplit{instructions} carefully and comment on each level that applies. If one or more levels do not apply to the company, make sure to explain it in the notes. & If Senior Manager and Manager \seqsplit{responsibilities} have been combined, 100\% may not be awarded.  Managers in a \seqsplit{senior-level} position may possess many of the same \seqsplit{responsibilities} as a manager, though on a more strategic level.  \seqsplit{Senior-level} managers possess the knowledge and expertise to guide managers in their roles. Because this position is a level up from the role of a manager, the level of \seqsplit{responsibility} increases in a broader scope.  In legislation supervisors are responsible for workers under their supervision, not all employees within the company.  Further to that, it is a manager (employer) \seqsplit{responsibility} to ensure whom ever supervises the employees is competent and understands their OHS duties, so it should be two very different roles.    The auditor can give the company recognition if they identify more levels than the identified four in the  guideline, but the question must be scored on just the 4 levels \tn 
% Row Count 78 (+ 78)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{17.67cm}{x{1.647 cm} x{4.6116 cm} x{5.1057 cm} x{5.1057 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{4}{x{17.67cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Documentation (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
1.12 & State number of  meeting minutes which verify management \seqsplit{participation} & Question 1.12 - is to verify if management (senior management., managers and \seqsplit{supervisors)} participate in meetings where health and safety is discussed outside of committee meetings.   The auditor will verify through \seqsplit{documentation} review if management levels are involved in regular health and safety \seqsplit{discussions.} The auditor could refer to general health and safety meeting minutes, team meeting minutes, a general assembly, whether management leads \seqsplit{tailgate/toolbox} meetings, or any other meetings where health and safety is a topic. & This is a H\&S leadership question. Auditors will review meeting minutes and identify if there was management \seqsplit{participation}.   As a best practice however, auditors should be examining if different members of the leadership team (i.e. senior managers, managers, and \seqsplit{supervisors)} participate in meetings where H\&S discussions take place, or are you noticing it is \seqsplit{consistently} the same members of management \seqsplit{participating} in all meetings (you might want to make a SFI if this is identified), however points would not be deducted for the question.   Do not sample HSC meeting records for this question, HSC meetings and practices are measured in Element 4. \tn 
% Row Count 55 (+ 55)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{17.67cm}{x{1.647 cm} x{4.6116 cm} x{5.1057 cm} x{5.1057 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{4}{x{17.67cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Documentation (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
2.1 & Number of jobs included in formal hazard \seqsplit{assessments} compared to the number of jobs listed in \seqsplit{organizational} chart and/or staff listing. & Question 2.1 - In this element auditors need to have a detailed look at the entire formal hazard assessment process, sampling is not acceptable.  Question 2.1 to determine if there is an inventory of job assignments, look for formal hazard assessment documents that would match up with the \seqsplit{organizational} chart or staff listing.   The auditor needs to be aware there may be like positions that will share a formal hazard assessment. Example would be \seqsplit{administrative} positions may all be captured on one \seqsplit{administrative} hazard assessment. The key is to ensure all positions included on the \seqsplit{organizational} chart have been included. This should also include equipment as ""equipment operators"" may be identified as a position with tasks. A \seqsplit{quantitative} measure must be included in your notes (i.e. formal hazard assessments reviewed included for 34 of the 40 positions on the \seqsplit{organizational} chart and state specific on what is missing. & Look at your \seqsplit{organization} chart.  Is there a Hazard Assessment created for every position.  Remember when building hazard assessments it is possible to have one hazard assessment which covers several alike positions (i.e. \seqsplit{Administrative)}. The Hazard Assessment should clearly however state all the positions it applies to. \tn 
% Row Count 78 (+ 78)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{17.67cm}{x{1.647 cm} x{4.6116 cm} x{5.1057 cm} x{5.1057 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{4}{x{17.67cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Documentation (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
2.2 & Number of jobs that have tasks assigned compared to the number of completed formal hazard \seqsplit{assessment.} & "Question 2.2 is a dependency question – read guidelines carefully to ensure a greater percentage is not awarded in 2.2 than awarded overall in 2.1.  Review of all formal hazard assessments is required, sampling is not acceptable in this question.  For each of the job assignments included in the inventory there needs to be a list of all common daily tasks. This does not mean the list needs to include every task a person may be asked to do in a lifetime; common daily tasks are what we are looking for. Involves the \seqsplit{identification} of all equipment, machinery, work areas and work processes where employees may be performing a task.   The intent is not to have a list of 100+ tasks rather to have a listing of common daily tasks performed by employees on a regular basis. Tasks that employees may be asked to do on an occasional/ rare basis should be dealt with through \seqsplit{site-specific} hazard \seqsplit{assessments."} & Examine job \seqsplit{descriptions} for each job identified.  Look for common daily tasks and ensure they are carried through to the task portion of the hazard \seqsplit{assessments.} \tn 
% Row Count 76 (+ 76)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{17.67cm}{x{1.647 cm} x{4.6116 cm} x{5.1057 cm} x{5.1057 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{4}{x{17.67cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Documentation (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
2.3 A \& B & Number of tasks that have hazards \seqsplit{identified/compared} to the sample size of tasks chosen for \seqsplit{verification}. & Question 2.3 is also a dependency question – ensure a higher percentage is not awarded for \seqsplit{identification} of either health or safety hazards than was awarded in 2.2.  Auditors must provide good notes explaining what types of health hazards and what types of safety hazards have been identified.  This question will be scored as a percentage for health hazards and a separate percentage for safety hazards. Neither of which can exceed the percentage awarded in 2.2.  The auditor needs to outline their sample size (which \seqsplit{jobs/positions} they chose to review). & "This is a two part question and you need to first determine if health hazards are identified and then score question 2.3a based on your sample size and positive findings, and then determine if safety hazards are identified and then score question 2.3b in the same manner. You are examining the HA's to determine of there are examples from all categories (Physical, Chemical, Biological, \seqsplit{Psychological} and Ergonomic).  Check to ensure that ""Workplace Violence and \seqsplit{Harassment""} and ""Working Alone"" are included as per \seqsplit{legislation.}   Note: ergonomic type hazards must also be considered in addition to the four listed in the guideline column, as per the AASP. \tn 
% Row Count 55 (+ 55)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{17.67cm}{x{1.647 cm} x{4.6116 cm} x{5.1057 cm} x{5.1057 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{4}{x{17.67cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Documentation (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
2.4 & Number of H\&S hazards that have been evaluated compared to the total number of H\&S hazards chosen to be sampled. & Question 2.4 - This is a dependency question – ensure a higher percentage is not awarded then the average percentage of 2.3.   Auditors need to keep an open mind when looking at hazard evaluation. There are many ways to evaluate the level of risk for each hazard, it is not the auditor's \seqsplit{responsibility} to tell the client they are wrong; if in fact they have evaluated each hazard, at minimum, using a two measure such as severity and likelihood. However, keep in mind the \seqsplit{instructions} state ""each"" hazard identified, meaning each hazard must be \seqsplit{independently} evaluated.  Do not evaluate hazards in groups.  State the \seqsplit{quantitative} measure based on sample size in your notes. & In this question you need to not only identify how hazards are being evaluated (Frequency, Severity, Likelihood), but you need to describe how this is being done. If at least two measurement factors are used, state what the values for those factors are, and how the final risk rating is determined (added together, multiplied, averaged, etc.). Check to see that each hazard is evaluated separately (not group rated, unless they alike or the same hazards such as mould and spores).                                                          EXAMPLE: The company evaluates hazards using a matrix of Probability X Severity. Probability measures the likelihood of an occurrence of hazard pre-control and is measured on a scale of one to five with 1 being unlikely and 5 being certain to occur. Severity measures the type of injury likely sustained is measured on a scale of one to five with one being minor injury and five being a fatality. The probability total is then multiplied by the severity total to determine an overall risk (Tolerable, Moderate or High). \tn 
% Row Count 89 (+ 89)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{17.67cm}{x{1.647 cm} x{4.6116 cm} x{5.1057 cm} x{5.1057 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{4}{x{17.67cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Documentation (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
2.8 & Number of employees trained in HA compared to the number of employees leading the HA process. & Question 2.8 - The guidelines for this question are clear, not all employees require formal hazard assessment training, the key employees involved in the development process must be trained. Auditors should reference the formal hazard assessment documents to determine which employees were involved in  the development, then check training records to verify training. Leaders of the hazard assessment process need to be formally trained. As a general  practice  employers  will train the HSC/HSR to take the leading roles. & Although formal training is preferred (i.e. in-house or third-party hazard assessment training), it is acceptable to award scoring if completion of the AASP's Module 1 – Guide to Develop a Health and Safety Management System (or an approved equivalent) can be verified for the individuals who led the employer's formal HAs. In-house training may also include content related to the company's \seqsplit{site-specific} hazard assessment process; however, this question is referring to training for formal hazard assessments only.  If training is delivered in-house, auditor to verify the training content meets the intent of formal hazard assessment training. Consider verifying it contains hazard \seqsplit{types/categories}, the hierarchy of control, as well as training on the company's \seqsplit{document/process} and evaluation system, at a minimum. \tn 
% Row Count 69 (+ 69)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{17.67cm}{x{1.647 cm} x{4.6116 cm} x{5.1057 cm} x{5.1057 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{4}{x{17.67cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Documentation (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
2.9 & Number of bullets verified, compared to the 6 bullets listed in \seqsplit{guidelines.}  OR  This can be confirmed within the note (either restating each bullet point or \seqsplit{specifically} stating ALL, then providing examples.  NONE also accepted in lieue of 0/6 criteria & Question 2.9- the auditor will be looking for a \seqsplit{directive/policy} that states the six criteria for a successful formal hazard assessment process. The \seqsplit{predetermined} frequency mentioned in the first bullet of the guidelines is meaning at least once every three years' minimum.  The other five bullets are \seqsplit{self-explanatory}.  The auditor will review documents outlining \seqsplit{process/procedural} changes and updated hazard assessment forms. There must be a \seqsplit{policy/process} written that includes all criteria to award points.  Auditor must state the \seqsplit{quantitative} value in their notes (e.g. 4/6 bullets were identified therefore points cannot be awarded, it requires 100\%)". & Read the guideline carefully, review the company's hazard assessment policy and/or process to ensure formal hazard assessments are required to be reviewed. Ensure each bullet point is addressed in your \seqsplit{justification} notes. \tn 
% Row Count 55 (+ 55)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{17.67cm}{x{1.647 cm} x{4.6116 cm} x{5.1057 cm} x{5.1057 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{4}{x{17.67cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Documentation (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
2.11 A \& B & Do not require a \seqsplit{quantitative} note for this question.  Either the company has a process or not. & Question 2.11 - For this question the auditor will be looking for a written \seqsplit{directive/policy} and/or process and procedure, in regards to \seqsplit{site-specific} (field level) hazard \seqsplit{assessments.}  A \seqsplit{policy/directive} states the company's expectation and \seqsplit{requirement;} a process is the expected flow of events; a procedure is a written \seqsplit{step-by-step} method required to accomplish the task.                                                                a)  example could be a warehouse upgrade - same place new activities - renovations in one area introduce new hazards requiring a site specific hazard assessment.  Example - a) could be scored 1/1 but not n/a. &  \tn 
% Row Count 54 (+ 54)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}----}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{17.67cm}{x{4.0488 cm} x{5.9045 cm} x{6.9167 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{17.67cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Interviews}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
Question & Quantitative & Reviewer Notes \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}---}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{17.67cm}{x{4.0488 cm} x{5.9045 cm} x{6.9167 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{3}{x{17.67cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Observations}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
Question & Quantitative & Reviewer Notes \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}---}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}



\end{document}