\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}

% Packages
\usepackage{fancyhdr}           % For header and footer
\usepackage{multicol}           % Allows multicols in tables
\usepackage{tabularx}           % Intelligent column widths
\usepackage{tabulary}           % Used in header and footer
\usepackage{hhline}             % Border under tables
\usepackage{graphicx}           % For images
\usepackage{xcolor}             % For hex colours
%\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}    % For unicode character support
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}        % Without this we get weird character replacements
\usepackage{colortbl}           % For coloured tables
\usepackage{setspace}           % For line height
\usepackage{lastpage}           % Needed for total page number
\usepackage{seqsplit}           % Splits long words.
%\usepackage{opensans}          % Can't make this work so far. Shame. Would be lovely.
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}     % For underlining links
% Most of the following are not required for the majority
% of cheat sheets but are needed for some symbol support.
\usepackage{amsmath}            % Symbols
\usepackage{MnSymbol}           % Symbols
\usepackage{wasysym}            % Symbols
%\usepackage[english,german,french,spanish,italian]{babel}              % Languages

% Document Info
\author{{[}deleted{]}}
\pdfinfo{
  /Title (the-organization-and-its-structure-mobu1m2.pdf)
  /Creator (Cheatography)
  /Author ({[}deleted{]})
  /Subject (The Organization and its Structure -MOBU1M2 Cheat Sheet)
}

% Lengths and widths
\addtolength{\textwidth}{6cm}
\addtolength{\textheight}{-1cm}
\addtolength{\hoffset}{-3cm}
\addtolength{\voffset}{-2cm}
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.2cm} % Space between columns
\setlength{\headsep}{-12pt} % Reduce space between header and content
\setlength{\headheight}{85pt} % If less, LaTeX automatically increases it
\renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0pt} % Remove footer line
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt} % Remove header line
\renewcommand{\seqinsert}{\ifmmode\allowbreak\else\-\fi} % Hyphens in seqsplit
% This two commands together give roughly
% the right line height in the tables
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
\onehalfspacing

% Commands
\newcommand{\SetRowColor}[1]{\noalign{\gdef\RowColorName{#1}}\rowcolor{\RowColorName}} % Shortcut for row colour
\newcommand{\mymulticolumn}[3]{\multicolumn{#1}{>{\columncolor{\RowColorName}}#2}{#3}} % For coloured multi-cols
\newcolumntype{x}[1]{>{\raggedright}p{#1}} % New column types for ragged-right paragraph columns
\newcommand{\tn}{\tabularnewline} % Required as custom column type in use

% Font and Colours
\definecolor{HeadBackground}{HTML}{333333}
\definecolor{FootBackground}{HTML}{666666}
\definecolor{TextColor}{HTML}{333333}
\definecolor{DarkBackground}{HTML}{A33188}
\definecolor{LightBackground}{HTML}{F9F2F7}
\renewcommand{\familydefault}{\sfdefault}
\color{TextColor}

% Header and Footer
\pagestyle{fancy}
\fancyhead{} % Set header to blank
\fancyfoot{} % Set footer to blank
\fancyhead[L]{
\noindent
\begin{multicols}{3}
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{C}
    \SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
    \vspace{-7pt}
    {\parbox{\dimexpr\textwidth-2\fboxsep\relax}{\noindent
        \hspace*{-6pt}\includegraphics[width=5.8cm]{/web/www.cheatography.com/public/images/cheatography_logo.pdf}}
    }
\end{tabulary}
\columnbreak
\begin{tabulary}{11cm}{L}
    \vspace{-2pt}\large{\bf{\textcolor{DarkBackground}{\textrm{The Organization and its Structure -MOBU1M2 Cheat Sheet}}}} \\
    \normalsize{by \textcolor{DarkBackground}{{[}deleted{]}} via \textcolor{DarkBackground}{\uline{cheatography.com/71017/cs/18007/}}}
\end{tabulary}
\end{multicols}}

\fancyfoot[L]{ \footnotesize
\noindent
\begin{multicols}{3}
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{LL}
  \SetRowColor{FootBackground}
  \mymulticolumn{2}{p{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cheatographer}}  \\
  \vspace{-2pt}{[}deleted{]} \\
  \uline{cheatography.com/deleted-71017} \\
  \end{tabulary}
\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{L}
  \SetRowColor{FootBackground}
  \mymulticolumn{1}{p{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Cheat Sheet}}  \\
   \vspace{-2pt}Published 5th December, 2018.\\
   Updated 24th November, 2018.\\
   Page {\thepage} of \pageref{LastPage}.
\end{tabulary}
\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabulary}{5.8cm}{L}
  \SetRowColor{FootBackground}
  \mymulticolumn{1}{p{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{Sponsor}}  \\
  \SetRowColor{white}
  \vspace{-5pt}
  %\includegraphics[width=48px,height=48px]{dave.jpeg}
  Measure your website readability!\\
  www.readability-score.com
\end{tabulary}
\end{multicols}}




\begin{document}
\raggedright
\raggedcolumns

% Set font size to small. Switch to any value
% from this page to resize cheat sheet text:
% www.emerson.emory.edu/services/latex/latex_169.html
\footnotesize % Small font.

\begin{multicols*}{3}

\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{INTRODUCTION}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{An organization is}} a well-coordinated social unit of two or more people with a desire to achieve a common goal or collective goals} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{5.377cm}}{\{\{bt\}\}{\bf{An organizational structure is}} a framework that outlines the lines of authority and communication in the organization} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 3)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{5.377cm}}{\{\{bt\}\}{\bf{Importance of organizational structures}}:\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-bolt\}\}Facilitates coordination of the activities conducted by the firm\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-bolt\}\}A formal outline of a company's structure makes it easier to add new positions in the company\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-bolt\}\}Improves operational efficiency by providing clarity and guidance to employees as it relates to their actions and lines of communication} \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 8)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{2.18988 cm} x{2.78712 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIZATIONS}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Functional Organizational Structure}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\emph{Definition:}} a common type of organizational structure in which the organization is divided into smaller groups based on specialized functional areas, such as accounting, purchasing or marketing.} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 4)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\{\{bt\}\}Features: & \{\{bt\}\}i. Well-defined communication channels which are usually downward. \{\{nl\}\} ii. Clearly outlined chain of command and supervisory roles \{\{nl\}\}  iii. Utilises job specialization and departments have well-defined roles \{\{nl\}\}  iv. Structure is less flexible and so it relies heavily on formal procedures \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 14)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\{\{bt\}\}Who is Fredrick W. Taylor? & \{\{bt\}\}He is the father of the Scientific Management Approach, which resulted in the functional organization structure \tn 
% Row Count 25 (+ 6)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\{\{bt\}\}{\emph{Advantages:}} {\bf{i.}} Slow decision-making process ensures that all of the variables are carefully considered before they are acted upon, thus saving the organization money, time and effort which could be invested elsewhere \{\{nl\}\} {\bf{ii.}} Segregating the workforce according to function clarifies organizational responsibility and allocation of tasks. This tends to eliminate duplication of assignments that waste time and effort.\{\{nl\}\}{\bf{iii.}} Easier for upper-level management to delegate operational functions to lower-level management \{\{nl\}\}{\bf{ iv.}} Increase in accountability as there are clear lines of management. \{\{nl\}\} {\bf{v.}} Grouping employees by specialization ensures a dependable level of departmental competence, thus improving the efficiency of the department and the quality of work produced by the department} \tn 
% Row Count 42 (+ 17)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{2.18988 cm} x{2.78712 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIZATIONS (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\{\{bt\}\}{\emph{Disadvantages:}} {\bf{i.}} Specialization can result in the individual or group becoming complacent and losing interest due to the work becoming monotonous, thus, it will be harder to motivate them. \{\{nl\}\} {\bf{ii.}} Co-ordination and control may become too stringent and lead to low morale. Having a common organizational purpose improves employee morale and performance and is an important predictor of organizational success. When each group of specialists in a functional organization is relatively isolated, the common bond that emphasizes a single overarching organizational purpose is almost inevitably weaker than in an organization where different kinds of employees regularly interact. \{\{nl\}\} {\bf{iii.}} The structure may become too rigid, hence, it may be unable to adapt to the constantly changing environment. \{\{nl\}\} {\bf{iv.}} The decision making process may be very slow, especially for very centralized structures. \{\{nl\}\} {\bf{v.}} The different functional groups may not communicate with each other which could potentially result in decreased flexibility and innovation} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 22)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 0)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 0)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Matrix Organizational Structure}}} \tn 
% Row Count 23 (+ 1)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\emph{Definition:}} they are unambiguous and relatively permanent (or stable) organizational models, in which each element in the organization reports to a higher element and concludes with the CEO or Board of Directors at the top.} \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 5)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{white}
\{\{bt\}\}Features: & \{\{bt\}\}i. Combines elements of the functional, product and possibly geographical organizational structures. \{\{nl\}\} ii. It is usually used where the environment is rapidly changing and there is a need for effective coordination to combat the situation. \{\{nl\}\} iii. This structure depicts two lines of authority: \{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-bolt\}\}vertical authority which concentrates on the major functional areas of the firm \{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-bolt\}\}horizontal lines which show the lines of authority across the different divisions, regions or departments \{\{nl\}\}iv. Employees are generally accountable to more than one boss\{\{nl\}\}v. There are usually two separate chains of command \{\{nl\}\} vi. there are two kinds of managers: functional managers and project managers\{\{nl\}\} vii. the balance of power between functional and project managers isn't organizationally defined \tn 
% Row Count 67 (+ 39)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{2.18988 cm} x{2.78712 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIZATIONS (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\{\{bt\}\}Pros: & \{\{bt\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\} Flexible and adaptable to the changing environment\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Employees are more involved in the operation of the firm\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Project management trains managers to become leaders in the functional organization\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Facilitates efficient use of limited human resources \tn 
% Row Count 15 (+ 15)
% Row 12
\SetRowColor{white}
\{\{bt\}\}Cons: & \{\{bt\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\}Teams may substitute the firm's objectives for theirs as decentralization occurs\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\}Requirement for high degree of cooperation between functional and project management\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\}This structure may lead to conflicts among departments as they compete for scarce resources\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\}There is always a possibility of the problem of dual loyalties \tn 
% Row Count 33 (+ 18)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{2.18988 cm} x{2.78712 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIZATIONS (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 13
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 0 (+ 0)
% Row 14
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Network Organizational Structure}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 15
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\emph{Definition:}} a decentralized organizational structure in which managers coordinate and control relations that are both internal and external to the firm} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 4)
% Row 16
\SetRowColor{white}
\{\{bt\}\}Pros: & \{\{bt\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Minimizes administrative costs \{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Faster decision-making process since there is a reduction in hierarchical structure \{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}This network structure is more agile than other structures. Because it is decentralized, a network organization has fewer tiers, a wider span of control, and a bottom-up flow of decision making and ideas.\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Communication is less siloed and flows freely, possibly opening up more opportunities for innovation. \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 23)
% Row 17
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\{\{bt\}\}Cons: & \{\{bt\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\} This more fluid structure can lead to a more complex set of relationships in the organization. For example, lines of accountability may be less clear, and reliance on external vendors can be quite high. These potentially unpredictable variables essentially reduce the core company's control over its operational success\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\} Can be time-consuming especially when there are regular meetings \tn 
% Row Count 48 (+ 20)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{2.18988 cm} x{2.78712 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIZATIONS (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 18
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\{\{bt\}\}Features & \{\{bt\}\}i. This organizational structure links a number of separated organizations with a desire to achieve a common goal through their interactions\{\{nl\}\}ii.The network can be in the form of a joint venture agreement or where some of the major functions of the firm are subcontracted to other firms. These firms are linked by and to a compay which serves as the headquarters or hub \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 18)
% Row 19
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 0)
% Row 20
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 0)
% Row 21
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 18 (+ 0)
% Row 22
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Team Organizational Structure}}} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 1)
% Row 23
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\emph{Definition:}} an organizational chart that groups employees on the same employment level into teams that perform specific job functions.} \tn 
% Row Count 22 (+ 3)
% Row 24
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\{\{bt\}\}Features: & \{\{bt\}\}{\bf{i.}}These teams are usually cross-functional and are composed of employees from different functional departments.\{\{nl\}\}{\bf{ii.}}Team members are answerable to both their functional managers and the team leader \tn 
% Row Count 32 (+ 10)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{2.18988 cm} x{2.78712 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIZATIONS (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 25
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\{\{bt\}\}{\bf{Pros}}\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}With no need to climb a lengthy chain of command to receive approval for ideas or changes to the business model, a team-based structure can make the necessary changes to quickly react to consumers' ever-changing tastes and preferences, as well as, allow for a more rapid response to different market conditions. \{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}A team-based lateral organizational structure can eliminate traditional scalar chains of command, which can cause delays and worker frustration with cumbersome communication lines. A team can more effectively raise concerns to management without appearing to be disgruntled or unnecessarily upset, and without opening themselves as individuals to repercussions by management for the issues raised by their team. This can make individuals more willing to speak out about problems or inefficiency in the workplace.\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Removes departmental barrier while facilitating intradepartmental relationship\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}By spreading the responsibility among team members rather than having a single individual in charge of decision-making or management of a business area, decisions can be reached by a quorum and can take place rapidly as team members can be assigned to research areas of need, implement changes, or work on other problems while other team members continue to focus on the current situation or business practice. Decisions made by a team are sometimes better thought out and more effectively implemented than decisions made by a single individual.} \tn 
% Row Count 31 (+ 31)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{2.18988 cm} x{2.78712 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIZATIONS (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 26
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\{\{bt\}\}{\bf{Cons:}} & \{\{bt\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\}This structure may lead to conflicts among departments as they compete for scarce resources.\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\}There is always a possibility of the problem of dual loyalties\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\}Teams may substitute the firm's general objective(s) fr theirs as decentralization occurs\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\}A lot of time is spent in meetings \tn 
% Row Count 16 (+ 16)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{0.89586 cm} x{4.08114 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIZATIONS (cont'd)}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Product Organizational Structure}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\emph{Definition:}} a framework in which a business is organised into separate divisions, each focusing on a different product or service and functioning as an individual unit within the company} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 4)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\seqsplit{Features:} & i. Each product is assigned the main functional departments of the organization \{\{nl\}\} ii. Each product unit is accountable for profit in that division \{\{nl\}\}  iii. Allows for delegation of responsibility by top management \tn 
% Row Count 12 (+ 7)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
Pros: & \{\{fa-check\}\} Can respond to market changes more flexibly and quickly \{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Focus is placed on the product's performance and level of profitability \{\{nl\}\} \{\{fa-check\}\} Diversification in the product offerings of the firm is encouraged \{\{nl\}\} \{\{fa-check\}\}Each product division is given more autonomy to achieve divisional and organizational objectives \tn 
% Row Count 24 (+ 12)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
Cons: & \{\{fa-star\}\} Can nurture negative rivalries among divisions  \{\{nl\}\} \{\{fa-star\}\} Risk of over-emphasizing divisional, rather than organisational goals \{\{nl\}\} \{\{fa-star\}\} Duplication of functional areas and resources, example a different sales team for each division  \{\{nl\}\} \{\{fa-star\}\} The success of the product is highly dependent on the people with direct contact with the product \tn 
% Row Count 36 (+ 12)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{0.89586 cm} x{4.08114 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIZATIONS (cont'd) (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 0 (+ 0)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Geographical Organizational Structure}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\emph{Definition:}} this framework which is typically used by multinational corporations, is an organisation structure where company hierarchy is divided on the basis of geographic location in which company operates which is headed by a centralized head office.} \tn 
% Row Count 7 (+ 6)
% Row 8
\SetRowColor{white}
\seqsplit{Features:} & i. Each region is a profit centre\{\{nl\}\} ii. The different regions are arranged on a functional or product basis. \{\{nl\}\} iii. Regions are allowed some amount of autonomy in the management of their operations. \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 7)
% Row 9
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
Pros: & \{\{fa-check\}\} It will be easier for organisations to track profits within regions and can focus on them as each region has different profit margins, revenues and sales practices.\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Each region has responsibility for profit generation\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}The organization is presented with local opportunities which may not otherwise be available \{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\} The firm can respond quickly to local environmental change \{\{nl\}\} \tn 
% Row Count 28 (+ 14)
% Row 10
\SetRowColor{white}
Cons: & \{\{fa-star\}\} There is duplication of functional groups and resources across regions \{\{nl\}\} \{\{fa-star\}\} Poor co-ordination across regions can hurt the entire organization \{\{nl\}\} \{\{fa-star\}\}Competition for corporate resources may lead to conflict \tn 
% Row Count 36 (+ 8)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{0.89586 cm} x{4.08114 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIZATIONS (cont'd) (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 11
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 0 (+ 0)
% Row 12
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 0 (+ 0)
% Row 13
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 0 (+ 0)
% Row 14
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Virtual Organizational Structure}}} \tn 
% Row Count 1 (+ 1)
% Row 15
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\emph{Definition:}} An organization consisting of networks of geographically dispersed employers and employees that combine their human resources, assets and ideas to produce a service or product.} \tn 
% Row Count 5 (+ 4)
% Row 16
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{Features: {\bf{i.}} Heavy reliance on a centralized database that uses communication technologies. \{\{nl\}\} {\bf{ii.}}Minimal physical structure\{\{nl\}\}{\bf{iii.}} The stakeholders within a virtual organization may not meet face to face for a while, if ever at all. Instead they communicate via the Internet to receive their assigned tasks and send their reports once their tasks are completed.\{\{nl\}\}{\bf{iv.}} Very few physical assets\{\{nl\}\}{\bf{v.}}Heavy reliance on a network of part-time self-employed workers who are connected electronically \{\{nl\}\} {\bf{vi.}} require firms to be much more dependent on one another than they have been in the past, demanding unprecedented levels of trust.} \tn 
% Row Count 19 (+ 14)
% Row 17
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
Pros: & \{\{fa-star\}\}Minimal overhead costs, as products are often outsourced\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\}Access to worldwide expertise in order to produce high-quality goods and services,  without having to meet physically.\{\{nl\}\} \{\{fa-star\}\}Enables a company to manufacture and distribute products without the hindrances of organizational boundaries or location. \tn 
% Row Count 30 (+ 11)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{0.89586 cm} x{4.08114 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIZATIONS (cont'd) (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 18
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{Cons: \{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\} Virtual organizations can be very complex and problematic.\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\} Communication in the virtual office may be difficult as people are working within different time zones. \{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}It can be difficult to build a corporate culture, as employees and employers may be from different cultures across the world. \{\{nl\}\} \{\{fa-check\}\}Close monitoring of external suppliers is required. \{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\} Heavy reliance on external organizations to provide high-quality goods in large quantities\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Lack of job security as the services of the employees might be sub-contracted} \tn 
% Row Count 13 (+ 13)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{2.38896 cm} x{2.58804 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CENTRALIZATION AND DECENTRALIZATION}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Centralization:}} A process where the concentration of decision making is lies in the senior management's hands. All subjects and actions at the lower level are subject to the approval of top management. There is minimal delegation of responsibility} \tn 
% Row Count 6 (+ 6)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Advantages of centralization:}} \{\{fa-check\}\}In a centralized organization, decisions are made by a small group of people and then communicated to the lower-level managers. The involvement of only a few people makes the decision-making process more efficient since they can discuss the details of each decision in one meeting.\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}The standardized procedures and better supervision in a centralized organization result in improved quality of work. There are supervisors in each department who ensure that the outputs are uniform and of high quality. \{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}There are less extensive planning and reporting procedures\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Facilitates easy control and coordination of policies} \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 15)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Disadvantages of centralization:}}\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\}The senior management may become over-burdened with their workload and may have to work long hours \{\{nl\}\} \{\{fa-star\}\}Employees become loyal to an organization when they are allowed personal initiatives in the work they do. They can introduce their creativity and suggest ways of performing certain tasks. However, in centralization, there is no initiative in work because employees perform tasks conceptualized by top executives. It limits their creativity and loyalty to the organization due to the rigidity of the work.\{\{nl\}\}\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-star\}\} Dictatorship: An employee is always expected to work according to what has been dictated to him. No employee at the subordinate level is given the authority to take a decision on a particular issue, in the absence of the lead. This causes psychological reluctance and the employee sees no growth or motivation within the corporation and hence results in him being disloyal towards the Company.} \tn 
% Row Count 41 (+ 20)
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\vfill
\columnbreak
\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{x{2.38896 cm} x{2.58804 cm} }
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{CENTRALIZATION AND DECENTRALIZATION (cont)}}  \tn
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{} \tn 
% Row Count 0 (+ 0)
% Row 4
\SetRowColor{white}
\{\{bt\}\}{\bf{Decentralization:}} & \{\{bt\}\}Decentralisation refers to tire systematic effort to delegate to the lowest levels all authority except those which can only be exercised at central points. \tn 
% Row Count 9 (+ 9)
% Row 5
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Features of a decentralized organization:}} A decentralized organization is often separated into divisions, with some amount of autonomy,however, working towards the fulfillment of the organization's goals} \tn 
% Row Count 14 (+ 5)
% Row 6
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{2}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Advantages of a decentralized organization:}}\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-bolt\}\}Workload of senior management is decreased as the workload of the firm is dispersed among departments and to different individuals\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-bolt\}\}May improve the level of motivation among employees\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-bolt\}\}Firms can respond to changes quicker} \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 7)
% Row 7
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
{\bf{Disadvantages of decentralization}} & \{\{fa-check\}\}Decentralisation becomes useless when there are no qualified and competent personnel.\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Under decentralization, it is not possible* to follow uniform policies and standardized procedures. Each manager will work and frame policies according to his talent.\{\{nl\}\}\{\{fa-check\}\}Decentralization of authority creates problems of co-ordination as authority lies dispersed widely throughout the organization. \tn 
% Row Count 43 (+ 22)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}--}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}

\begin{tabularx}{5.377cm}{X}
\SetRowColor{DarkBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{5.377cm}}{\bf\textcolor{white}{{\bf{FACTORS AFFECTING THE CLASSIFICATION }}}}  \tn
% Row 0
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Size of the firm:}} As firms increase in size it may be necessary to upgrade or downgrade their organizational structure} \tn 
% Row Count 3 (+ 3)
% Row 1
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{The business cycle:}} Organizational structural choices are also dictated by the life-cycle stage of your business. In many instances, companies that are in the beginning stage of their development tend to concentrate power and authority in the hands of the founder, and on a small group of trusted advisors. Many companies at this stage don't have a formal design, because business owners haven't mastered which factors influence organizational structure. However, as companies move into a growth phase, control often shifts from the upper tier of management to a more pyramid-like structure, in which authority is granted throughout the various levels.} \tn 
% Row Count 17 (+ 14)
% Row 2
\SetRowColor{LightBackground}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{Business strategy and objectives:}} By aligning your strategy with the organization's most important objective(s), they will maximize their chances for sustained success.} \tn 
% Row Count 21 (+ 4)
% Row 3
\SetRowColor{white}
\mymulticolumn{1}{x{5.377cm}}{{\bf{The business environment:}} The environment is the world in which the organization operates, and includes conditions that influence the organization such as economic, social-cultural, legal-political, technological, and natural environment conditions.} \tn 
% Row Count 27 (+ 6)
\hhline{>{\arrayrulecolor{DarkBackground}}-}
\end{tabularx}
\par\addvspace{1.3em}


% That's all folks
\end{multicols*}

\end{document}